Is there anything to be afraid of in Brandi’s “Teoria del restauro”? The paralyzing myth of fear
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | P@ranoá |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/29287 |
Resumo: | In the last few years we have witnessed the upsurge of publications in the area of conservation and restoration defending the idea that Cesare Brandi´s “Teoria del restauro” has become antiquated and is even impossible to comprehend, due to the identification of inherent contradictions and the difficult reading of its complex form of Italian language. This article aims to discuss some of the points presented by the Spanish author Salvador Muñoz Viñas as contradictions found in Brandi´s theory. Are they really contradictions? Reductionist interpretations end up leading to an polarized debate, that tends to fall into criticism for the sake of criticism. Here we would like to emphasize the need to get over this unproductive dichotomy between “brandians par excellence” and “postmodernists” of conservation. To the development of our argument, we will discuss the concept of restoration, the themes of integrity, authenticity and the brandian concept of potential unity. |
id |
UNB-28_71bdbc73d0daefee794e53446c955839 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29287 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-28 |
network_name_str |
P@ranoá |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Is there anything to be afraid of in Brandi’s “Teoria del restauro”? The paralyzing myth of fearHá algo a temer na “Teoria da Restauração” de Brandi? O mito paralisante do medorestauraçãoCesare BrandiMuñoz Viñasunidade potencialintegridadeautenticidaderestauraciónCesare BrandiMuñoz Viñasunidad potencialintegridadautenticidadrestoration; Cesare Brandi; Muñoz Viñas; potential unit; integrity; authenticityIn the last few years we have witnessed the upsurge of publications in the area of conservation and restoration defending the idea that Cesare Brandi´s “Teoria del restauro” has become antiquated and is even impossible to comprehend, due to the identification of inherent contradictions and the difficult reading of its complex form of Italian language. This article aims to discuss some of the points presented by the Spanish author Salvador Muñoz Viñas as contradictions found in Brandi´s theory. Are they really contradictions? Reductionist interpretations end up leading to an polarized debate, that tends to fall into criticism for the sake of criticism. Here we would like to emphasize the need to get over this unproductive dichotomy between “brandians par excellence” and “postmodernists” of conservation. To the development of our argument, we will discuss the concept of restoration, the themes of integrity, authenticity and the brandian concept of potential unity. Nos últimos anos, testemunha-se o surgimento de publicações na área de conservação e restauração, defendendo a ideia de que a “Teoria da Restauração” de Cesare Brandi se tornou antiquada e até mesmo impossível de compreender, devido à identificação de contradições e à leitura difícil decorrente de uma pretensa erudição de sua escrita na língua italiana. Este artigo tem como objetivo discutir alguns dos pontos apresentados pelo autor espanhol Salvador Muñoz Viñas como contradições encontradas na teoria de Brandi. Eles são realmente contradições? Interpretações reducionistas acabam levando a um debate polarizado, que tende a cair na crítica pela crítica. Este artigo defende a necessidade de superar essa dicotomia improdutiva entre "brandianos por excelência" e "pós-modernistas" na conservação do patrimônio cultural. Para o desenvolvimento desse argumento, será discutido o conceito de restauração, os temas de integridade, autenticidade e o conceito brandiano de unidade potencial da obra de arte.Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo2020-03-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/2928710.18830/issn.1679-0944.n25.2020.06Paranoá; Vol. 13 No. 25 (2020): Special Issue: Theory, History and Critique; 83-93Paranoá; v. 13 n. 25 (2020): Dossiê Especial: Teoria, História e Crítica; 83-931679-09441677-7395reponame:P@ranoáinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/29287/25484Copyright (c) 2020 Paranoá: cadernos de arquitetura e urbanismoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiranda Vieira-de-Araújo, Natália Lira, Flaviana2024-02-08T14:14:25Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29287Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoaPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/oaiparanoa@unb.br1679-09441677-7395opendoar:2024-02-08T14:14:25P@ranoá - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is there anything to be afraid of in Brandi’s “Teoria del restauro”? The paralyzing myth of fear Há algo a temer na “Teoria da Restauração” de Brandi? O mito paralisante do medo |
title |
Is there anything to be afraid of in Brandi’s “Teoria del restauro”? The paralyzing myth of fear |
spellingShingle |
Is there anything to be afraid of in Brandi’s “Teoria del restauro”? The paralyzing myth of fear Miranda Vieira-de-Araújo, Natália restauração Cesare Brandi Muñoz Viñas unidade potencial integridade autenticidade restauración Cesare Brandi Muñoz Viñas unidad potencial integridad autenticidad restoration; Cesare Brandi; Muñoz Viñas; potential unit; integrity; authenticity |
title_short |
Is there anything to be afraid of in Brandi’s “Teoria del restauro”? The paralyzing myth of fear |
title_full |
Is there anything to be afraid of in Brandi’s “Teoria del restauro”? The paralyzing myth of fear |
title_fullStr |
Is there anything to be afraid of in Brandi’s “Teoria del restauro”? The paralyzing myth of fear |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is there anything to be afraid of in Brandi’s “Teoria del restauro”? The paralyzing myth of fear |
title_sort |
Is there anything to be afraid of in Brandi’s “Teoria del restauro”? The paralyzing myth of fear |
author |
Miranda Vieira-de-Araújo, Natália |
author_facet |
Miranda Vieira-de-Araújo, Natália Lira, Flaviana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lira, Flaviana |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Miranda Vieira-de-Araújo, Natália Lira, Flaviana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
restauração Cesare Brandi Muñoz Viñas unidade potencial integridade autenticidade restauración Cesare Brandi Muñoz Viñas unidad potencial integridad autenticidad restoration; Cesare Brandi; Muñoz Viñas; potential unit; integrity; authenticity |
topic |
restauração Cesare Brandi Muñoz Viñas unidade potencial integridade autenticidade restauración Cesare Brandi Muñoz Viñas unidad potencial integridad autenticidad restoration; Cesare Brandi; Muñoz Viñas; potential unit; integrity; authenticity |
description |
In the last few years we have witnessed the upsurge of publications in the area of conservation and restoration defending the idea that Cesare Brandi´s “Teoria del restauro” has become antiquated and is even impossible to comprehend, due to the identification of inherent contradictions and the difficult reading of its complex form of Italian language. This article aims to discuss some of the points presented by the Spanish author Salvador Muñoz Viñas as contradictions found in Brandi´s theory. Are they really contradictions? Reductionist interpretations end up leading to an polarized debate, that tends to fall into criticism for the sake of criticism. Here we would like to emphasize the need to get over this unproductive dichotomy between “brandians par excellence” and “postmodernists” of conservation. To the development of our argument, we will discuss the concept of restoration, the themes of integrity, authenticity and the brandian concept of potential unity. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/29287 10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n25.2020.06 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/29287 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18830/issn.1679-0944.n25.2020.06 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/paranoa/article/view/29287/25484 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Paranoá: cadernos de arquitetura e urbanismo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Paranoá: cadernos de arquitetura e urbanismo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Paranoá; Vol. 13 No. 25 (2020): Special Issue: Theory, History and Critique; 83-93 Paranoá; v. 13 n. 25 (2020): Dossiê Especial: Teoria, História e Crítica; 83-93 1679-0944 1677-7395 reponame:P@ranoá instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
P@ranoá |
collection |
P@ranoá |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
P@ranoá - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
paranoa@unb.br |
_version_ |
1797066979616489472 |