Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coelho Junior, Francisco Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Mariana dos Santos, Duarte Mauch, Ana Gabriela, da Silva Lopes, Gislene Lima, Chambel, Maria José, V. Torres, Cláudio, Guilherme Lima Macedo, Francisco
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/44132
Resumo: The aim of this article is to present evidence of validity for the ‘work-family conflict scale’ with a sample of 10,383 professionals working in Brazilian public security. Cross-validation procedures were applied through the definition of two subsamples, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. All ethical procedures were followed. The results found in both the exploratory factor analysis (‘Work Interference with Family’ Factor, with factor loadings between .91 and .81 and alpha of .93, and ‘Family Interference with Work’ Factor, with factor loadings between .96 and .71 and alpha of .90) and the confirmatory analysis (χ2/df <5; CFI >.98; TLI >.98; RMSEA <.10) demonstrate robust evidence of validity, indicating the use of the scale in other organizational contexts.
id UNB-4_82913e219114b4a2d89c05427a8ae7f2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44132
network_acronym_str UNB-4
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security ProfessionalsEvidências de Validade da Escala Conflito Trabalho-Família para Profissionais da Segurança PúblicaWork-family conflict, Family-work conflict, Public securityConflito trabalho-família; Conflito família-trabalho, Segurança públicaThe aim of this article is to present evidence of validity for the ‘work-family conflict scale’ with a sample of 10,383 professionals working in Brazilian public security. Cross-validation procedures were applied through the definition of two subsamples, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. All ethical procedures were followed. The results found in both the exploratory factor analysis (‘Work Interference with Family’ Factor, with factor loadings between .91 and .81 and alpha of .93, and ‘Family Interference with Work’ Factor, with factor loadings between .96 and .71 and alpha of .90) and the confirmatory analysis (χ2/df <5; CFI >.98; TLI >.98; RMSEA <.10) demonstrate robust evidence of validity, indicating the use of the scale in other organizational contexts.O artigo tem como objetivo geral apresentar evidências de validade da escala ‘conflito trabalho-família’ junto a uma amostra de 10.383 profissionais que atuam na segurança pública brasileira. Optou-se pela condução dos procedimentos de validação cruzada, por meio da definição de duas subamostras, foram realizadas análises fatoriais exploratórias e confirmatórias. Todos os procedimentos éticos foram adotados. Os resultados encontrados tanto na análise fatorial exploratória (Fator ‘Interferência do Trabalho na Família’, com cargas fatoriais entre 0,91 e 0,81 e alpha de 0,93 e Fator ‘Interferência da Família no Trabalho, com cargas entre 0,96 a 0,71 e alpha de 0,90) quanto confirmatória (χ2/gl < 5; CFI > 0,98; TLI > 0,98; RMSEA < 0,1) demonstram robustas evidências de validade, indicando o uso da escala em outros contextos organizacionais.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2023-06-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/4413210.1590/0102.3772e39503.ptPsicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 39 (2023)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 39 (2023)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 39 (2023)Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 39 (2023)1806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporenghttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/44132/37154https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/44132/37001Copyright (c) 2023 Francisco Antonio Coelho Junior, Mariana dos Santos Rodrigues, Ana Gabriela Duarte Mauch, Gislene Lima da Silva Lopes, Maria José Chambel, Cláudio V. Torres, Francisco Guilherme Lima Macedohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoelho Junior, Francisco AntonioRodrigues, Mariana dos SantosDuarte Mauch, Ana Gabrielada Silva Lopes, Gislene LimaChambel, Maria JoséV. Torres, CláudioGuilherme Lima Macedo, Francisco2023-07-18T14:31:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/44132Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2023-07-18T14:31:18Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals
Evidências de Validade da Escala Conflito Trabalho-Família para Profissionais da Segurança Pública
title Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals
spellingShingle Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals
Coelho Junior, Francisco Antonio
Work-family conflict, Family-work conflict, Public security
Conflito trabalho-família; Conflito família-trabalho, Segurança pública
title_short Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals
title_full Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals
title_fullStr Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals
title_full_unstemmed Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals
title_sort Validity Evidence of the Work-Family Conflict Scale for Public Security Professionals
author Coelho Junior, Francisco Antonio
author_facet Coelho Junior, Francisco Antonio
Rodrigues, Mariana dos Santos
Duarte Mauch, Ana Gabriela
da Silva Lopes, Gislene Lima
Chambel, Maria José
V. Torres, Cláudio
Guilherme Lima Macedo, Francisco
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Mariana dos Santos
Duarte Mauch, Ana Gabriela
da Silva Lopes, Gislene Lima
Chambel, Maria José
V. Torres, Cláudio
Guilherme Lima Macedo, Francisco
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coelho Junior, Francisco Antonio
Rodrigues, Mariana dos Santos
Duarte Mauch, Ana Gabriela
da Silva Lopes, Gislene Lima
Chambel, Maria José
V. Torres, Cláudio
Guilherme Lima Macedo, Francisco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Work-family conflict, Family-work conflict, Public security
Conflito trabalho-família; Conflito família-trabalho, Segurança pública
topic Work-family conflict, Family-work conflict, Public security
Conflito trabalho-família; Conflito família-trabalho, Segurança pública
description The aim of this article is to present evidence of validity for the ‘work-family conflict scale’ with a sample of 10,383 professionals working in Brazilian public security. Cross-validation procedures were applied through the definition of two subsamples, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. All ethical procedures were followed. The results found in both the exploratory factor analysis (‘Work Interference with Family’ Factor, with factor loadings between .91 and .81 and alpha of .93, and ‘Family Interference with Work’ Factor, with factor loadings between .96 and .71 and alpha of .90) and the confirmatory analysis (χ2/df <5; CFI >.98; TLI >.98; RMSEA <.10) demonstrate robust evidence of validity, indicating the use of the scale in other organizational contexts.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/44132
10.1590/0102.3772e39503.pt
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/44132
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0102.3772e39503.pt
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/44132/37154
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/44132/37001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 39 (2023)
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 39 (2023)
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 39 (2023)
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 39 (2023)
1806-3446
0102-3772
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaptp@gmail.com
_version_ 1800211716326293504

Registros relacionados