Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gouveia, Valdiney V
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059
Resumo: This study aimed to gain knowledge regarding the way Brazilian Social Psychology researchers conceivetheir field, considering the science-practice dichotomy. Participants were 100 representatives of research groups of thisdiscipline. They answered an online questionnaire with five parts: conceptions of social psychology, area representatives,reference journals, attitudes toward the discipline as basic and applied sciences and demographic questions. Social psychologywas conceived as socio-historical-critical, polarizing between Silvia Lane and Aroldo Rodrigues. The journal Psicologia &Sociedade was considered the most appropriate for publications in this area, while internationally the Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology was highlighted. Participants’ attitudes characterized this discipline as applied rather than basic science.In conclusion, the abrapsian perspective is predominant in Brazil, diverging some researchers of the classic social psychology.
id UNB-4_d996a832bf203e6f493fd01d00c3ef40
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18059
network_acronym_str UNB-4
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL COMO CIÊNCIA E PRÁTICA:: O QUE PENSAM PESQUISADORES BRASILEIROS?Psicologia SocialCriseRelevânciaCiência básicaCiência aplicadaSocial psychologyCrisisRelevanceBasic scienceApplied scienceThis study aimed to gain knowledge regarding the way Brazilian Social Psychology researchers conceivetheir field, considering the science-practice dichotomy. Participants were 100 representatives of research groups of thisdiscipline. They answered an online questionnaire with five parts: conceptions of social psychology, area representatives,reference journals, attitudes toward the discipline as basic and applied sciences and demographic questions. Social psychologywas conceived as socio-historical-critical, polarizing between Silvia Lane and Aroldo Rodrigues. The journal Psicologia &Sociedade was considered the most appropriate for publications in this area, while internationally the Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology was highlighted. Participants’ attitudes characterized this discipline as applied rather than basic science.In conclusion, the abrapsian perspective is predominant in Brazil, diverging some researchers of the classic social psychology.O objetivo deste estudo foi conhecer como pesquisadores da Psicologia Social brasileira a concebem, considerando a dicotomia ciência-prática. Participaram 100 representantes de grupos de pesquisa desta disciplina. Estes responderam questionário online com cinco partes: concepções da psicologia social, representantes da área, periódicos de referência, atitudes frente à disciplina como ciência aplicada e básica e informações demográficas. A psicologia social foi concebida como sócio-histórico-crítica, polarizando entre Silvia Lane e Aroldo Rodrigues. Considerou-se Psicologia & Sociedade como mais apropriada para publicações desta área, destacando-se internacionalmente o Journal Personality and Social Psychology. As atitudes dos participantes a caracterizaram como mais aplicada. Concluindo, predomina a perspectiva abrapsiana no Brasil, divergindo alguns pesquisadores da psicologia social clássica.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2016-02-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 Núm. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 31 n. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-5001806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059/16555https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059/17347Gouveia, Valdiney Vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-11-01T14:54:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18059Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2018-11-01T14:54:16Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?
PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL COMO CIÊNCIA E PRÁTICA:: O QUE PENSAM PESQUISADORES BRASILEIROS?
title Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?
spellingShingle Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?
Gouveia, Valdiney V
Psicologia Social
Crise
Relevância
Ciência básica
Ciência aplicada
Social psychology
Crisis
Relevance
Basic science
Applied science
title_short Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?
title_full Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?
title_fullStr Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?
title_full_unstemmed Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?
title_sort Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?
author Gouveia, Valdiney V
author_facet Gouveia, Valdiney V
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gouveia, Valdiney V
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Psicologia Social
Crise
Relevância
Ciência básica
Ciência aplicada
Social psychology
Crisis
Relevance
Basic science
Applied science
topic Psicologia Social
Crise
Relevância
Ciência básica
Ciência aplicada
Social psychology
Crisis
Relevance
Basic science
Applied science
description This study aimed to gain knowledge regarding the way Brazilian Social Psychology researchers conceivetheir field, considering the science-practice dichotomy. Participants were 100 representatives of research groups of thisdiscipline. They answered an online questionnaire with five parts: conceptions of social psychology, area representatives,reference journals, attitudes toward the discipline as basic and applied sciences and demographic questions. Social psychologywas conceived as socio-historical-critical, polarizing between Silvia Lane and Aroldo Rodrigues. The journal Psicologia &Sociedade was considered the most appropriate for publications in this area, while internationally the Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology was highlighted. Participants’ attitudes characterized this discipline as applied rather than basic science.In conclusion, the abrapsian perspective is predominant in Brazil, diverging some researchers of the classic social psychology.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059/16555
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059/17347
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 Núm. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 31 n. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500
1806-3446
0102-3772
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaptp@gmail.com
_version_ 1800211713274937344

Registros relacionados