Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to gain knowledge regarding the way Brazilian Social Psychology researchers conceivetheir field, considering the science-practice dichotomy. Participants were 100 representatives of research groups of thisdiscipline. They answered an online questionnaire with five parts: conceptions of social psychology, area representatives,reference journals, attitudes toward the discipline as basic and applied sciences and demographic questions. Social psychologywas conceived as socio-historical-critical, polarizing between Silvia Lane and Aroldo Rodrigues. The journal Psicologia &Sociedade was considered the most appropriate for publications in this area, while internationally the Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology was highlighted. Participants’ attitudes characterized this discipline as applied rather than basic science.In conclusion, the abrapsian perspective is predominant in Brazil, diverging some researchers of the classic social psychology. |
id |
UNB-4_d996a832bf203e6f493fd01d00c3ef40 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18059 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-4 |
network_name_str |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think?PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL COMO CIÊNCIA E PRÁTICA:: O QUE PENSAM PESQUISADORES BRASILEIROS?Psicologia SocialCriseRelevânciaCiência básicaCiência aplicadaSocial psychologyCrisisRelevanceBasic scienceApplied scienceThis study aimed to gain knowledge regarding the way Brazilian Social Psychology researchers conceivetheir field, considering the science-practice dichotomy. Participants were 100 representatives of research groups of thisdiscipline. They answered an online questionnaire with five parts: conceptions of social psychology, area representatives,reference journals, attitudes toward the discipline as basic and applied sciences and demographic questions. Social psychologywas conceived as socio-historical-critical, polarizing between Silvia Lane and Aroldo Rodrigues. The journal Psicologia &Sociedade was considered the most appropriate for publications in this area, while internationally the Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology was highlighted. Participants’ attitudes characterized this discipline as applied rather than basic science.In conclusion, the abrapsian perspective is predominant in Brazil, diverging some researchers of the classic social psychology.O objetivo deste estudo foi conhecer como pesquisadores da Psicologia Social brasileira a concebem, considerando a dicotomia ciência-prática. Participaram 100 representantes de grupos de pesquisa desta disciplina. Estes responderam questionário online com cinco partes: concepções da psicologia social, representantes da área, periódicos de referência, atitudes frente à disciplina como ciência aplicada e básica e informações demográficas. A psicologia social foi concebida como sócio-histórico-crítica, polarizando entre Silvia Lane e Aroldo Rodrigues. Considerou-se Psicologia & Sociedade como mais apropriada para publicações desta área, destacando-se internacionalmente o Journal Personality and Social Psychology. As atitudes dos participantes a caracterizaram como mais aplicada. Concluindo, predomina a perspectiva abrapsiana no Brasil, divergindo alguns pesquisadores da psicologia social clássica.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2016-02-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 Núm. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 31 n. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-5001806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059/16555https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059/17347Gouveia, Valdiney Vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-11-01T14:54:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18059Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2018-11-01T14:54:16Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think? PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL COMO CIÊNCIA E PRÁTICA:: O QUE PENSAM PESQUISADORES BRASILEIROS? |
title |
Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think? |
spellingShingle |
Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think? Gouveia, Valdiney V Psicologia Social Crise Relevância Ciência básica Ciência aplicada Social psychology Crisis Relevance Basic science Applied science |
title_short |
Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think? |
title_full |
Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think? |
title_fullStr |
Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think? |
title_sort |
Social Psychology as Science and Practice:: What do Brazilian Researchers Think? |
author |
Gouveia, Valdiney V |
author_facet |
Gouveia, Valdiney V |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gouveia, Valdiney V |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia Social Crise Relevância Ciência básica Ciência aplicada Social psychology Crisis Relevance Basic science Applied science |
topic |
Psicologia Social Crise Relevância Ciência básica Ciência aplicada Social psychology Crisis Relevance Basic science Applied science |
description |
This study aimed to gain knowledge regarding the way Brazilian Social Psychology researchers conceivetheir field, considering the science-practice dichotomy. Participants were 100 representatives of research groups of thisdiscipline. They answered an online questionnaire with five parts: conceptions of social psychology, area representatives,reference journals, attitudes toward the discipline as basic and applied sciences and demographic questions. Social psychologywas conceived as socio-historical-critical, polarizing between Silvia Lane and Aroldo Rodrigues. The journal Psicologia &Sociedade was considered the most appropriate for publications in this area, while internationally the Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology was highlighted. Participants’ attitudes characterized this discipline as applied rather than basic science.In conclusion, the abrapsian perspective is predominant in Brazil, diverging some researchers of the classic social psychology. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059/16555 https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18059/17347 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500 Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 Núm. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500 Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500 Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 31 n. 4 (2015): Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 491-500 1806-3446 0102-3772 reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
collection |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaptp@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1800211713274937344 |