What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sociedade e Estado |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/23920 |
Resumo: | The concept of neoliberalism has been retaken by the social sciences since 2000s, with the reopening of the international debate that seeks to give more precise definitions in its critical aspect. The main arguments against the use of the concept are analyzed and its use is defended due to its strategic importance. Definitions are grouped according to the main sociological theories, separating between those that present an "essence" of Neoliberalism (Foucaultian, Marxian, Bourdieusian and Weberian theories) and those that prefer to deal with the multiplicity of singular historical and geographical manifestations, emphasizing the hybrid character of neoliberalism (post-colonialist, governmental hybridism and neoregulationist theories). It concludes by pointing to the complementarity of the targets, but also to the strategic implications of different theoretical options, especially regarding the diagnosis of the "death" of neoliberalism after the financial crisis of 2008. |
id |
UNB-9_5446c3f98c89cd0cfe6bc3b15cffb72b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23920 |
network_acronym_str |
UNB-9 |
network_name_str |
Sociedade e Estado |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciencesO que é o neoliberalismo? A renovação do debate nas ciências sociaisNeoliberalismoCiências sociaisCríticaDefiniçãoHistória do conceitoNeoliberalismSocial sciencesCriticismDefinitionHistory of the conceptThe concept of neoliberalism has been retaken by the social sciences since 2000s, with the reopening of the international debate that seeks to give more precise definitions in its critical aspect. The main arguments against the use of the concept are analyzed and its use is defended due to its strategic importance. Definitions are grouped according to the main sociological theories, separating between those that present an "essence" of Neoliberalism (Foucaultian, Marxian, Bourdieusian and Weberian theories) and those that prefer to deal with the multiplicity of singular historical and geographical manifestations, emphasizing the hybrid character of neoliberalism (post-colonialist, governmental hybridism and neoregulationist theories). It concludes by pointing to the complementarity of the targets, but also to the strategic implications of different theoretical options, especially regarding the diagnosis of the "death" of neoliberalism after the financial crisis of 2008.O conceito de neoliberalismo foi retomado pelas ciências sociais desde os anos de 2000, com a reabertura do debate internacional que busca dar definições mais precisas em sua vertente crítica. São analisados os principais argumentos contrários à utilização do conceito e defende-se seu uso devido à sua importância estratégica. As definições são agrupadas segundo as principais teorias sociológicas, separando entre aquelas que apresentam uma “essência” do neoliberalismo (teorias foucaultiana, marxista, bourdieusiana e weberiana) e aquelas que preferem tratar da multiplicidade de manifestações históricas e geográficas singulares, enfatizando o caráter híbrido dos neoliberalismos (pós-colonialista, hibridismo governamental e neorregulacionista). Conclui-se apontando para a complementaridade dos alvos, mas também para as implicações estratégicas das diferentes opções teóricas.Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL2019-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/2392010.1590/s0102-6992-201934010009Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 34 No. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-239Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 34 Núm. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-239Sociedade e Estado; v. 34 n. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-2391980-54620102-6992reponame:Sociedade e Estadoinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/23920/21747Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociedade e Estadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Daniel Pereira2019-05-07T19:33:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23920Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/oaiportaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br1980-54620102-6992opendoar:2019-05-07T19:33:08Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences O que é o neoliberalismo? A renovação do debate nas ciências sociais |
title |
What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences |
spellingShingle |
What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences Andrade, Daniel Pereira Neoliberalismo Ciências sociais Crítica Definição História do conceito Neoliberalism Social sciences Criticism Definition History of the concept |
title_short |
What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences |
title_full |
What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences |
title_fullStr |
What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences |
title_full_unstemmed |
What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences |
title_sort |
What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences |
author |
Andrade, Daniel Pereira |
author_facet |
Andrade, Daniel Pereira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Daniel Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Neoliberalismo Ciências sociais Crítica Definição História do conceito Neoliberalism Social sciences Criticism Definition History of the concept |
topic |
Neoliberalismo Ciências sociais Crítica Definição História do conceito Neoliberalism Social sciences Criticism Definition History of the concept |
description |
The concept of neoliberalism has been retaken by the social sciences since 2000s, with the reopening of the international debate that seeks to give more precise definitions in its critical aspect. The main arguments against the use of the concept are analyzed and its use is defended due to its strategic importance. Definitions are grouped according to the main sociological theories, separating between those that present an "essence" of Neoliberalism (Foucaultian, Marxian, Bourdieusian and Weberian theories) and those that prefer to deal with the multiplicity of singular historical and geographical manifestations, emphasizing the hybrid character of neoliberalism (post-colonialist, governmental hybridism and neoregulationist theories). It concludes by pointing to the complementarity of the targets, but also to the strategic implications of different theoretical options, especially regarding the diagnosis of the "death" of neoliberalism after the financial crisis of 2008. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/23920 10.1590/s0102-6992-201934010009 |
url |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/23920 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/s0102-6992-201934010009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/23920/21747 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociedade e Estado info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociedade e Estado |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 34 No. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-239 Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 34 Núm. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-239 Sociedade e Estado; v. 34 n. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-239 1980-5462 0102-6992 reponame:Sociedade e Estado instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB) instacron:UNB |
instname_str |
Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
instacron_str |
UNB |
institution |
UNB |
reponame_str |
Sociedade e Estado |
collection |
Sociedade e Estado |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
portaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br |
_version_ |
1800211064696078336 |