What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Daniel Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sociedade e Estado
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/23920
Resumo: The concept of neoliberalism has been retaken by the social sciences since 2000s, with the reopening of the international debate that seeks to give more precise definitions in its critical aspect. The main arguments against the use of the concept are analyzed and its use is defended due to its strategic importance. Definitions are grouped according to the main sociological theories, separating between those that present an "essence" of Neoliberalism (Foucaultian, Marxian, Bourdieusian and Weberian theories) and those that prefer to deal with the multiplicity of singular historical and geographical manifestations, emphasizing the hybrid character of neoliberalism (post-colonialist, governmental hybridism and neoregulationist theories). It concludes by pointing to the complementarity of the targets, but also to the strategic implications of different theoretical options, especially regarding the diagnosis of the "death" of neoliberalism after the financial crisis of 2008.
id UNB-9_5446c3f98c89cd0cfe6bc3b15cffb72b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23920
network_acronym_str UNB-9
network_name_str Sociedade e Estado
repository_id_str
spelling What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciencesO que é o neoliberalismo? A renovação do debate nas ciências sociaisNeoliberalismoCiências sociaisCríticaDefiniçãoHistória do conceitoNeoliberalismSocial sciencesCriticismDefinitionHistory of the conceptThe concept of neoliberalism has been retaken by the social sciences since 2000s, with the reopening of the international debate that seeks to give more precise definitions in its critical aspect. The main arguments against the use of the concept are analyzed and its use is defended due to its strategic importance. Definitions are grouped according to the main sociological theories, separating between those that present an "essence" of Neoliberalism (Foucaultian, Marxian, Bourdieusian and Weberian theories) and those that prefer to deal with the multiplicity of singular historical and geographical manifestations, emphasizing the hybrid character of neoliberalism (post-colonialist, governmental hybridism and neoregulationist theories). It concludes by pointing to the complementarity of the targets, but also to the strategic implications of different theoretical options, especially regarding the diagnosis of the "death" of neoliberalism after the financial crisis of 2008.O conceito de neoliberalismo foi retomado pelas ciências sociais desde os anos de 2000, com a reabertura do debate internacional que busca dar definições mais precisas em sua vertente crítica. São analisados os principais argumentos contrários à utilização do conceito e defende-se seu uso devido à sua importância estratégica. As definições são agrupadas segundo as principais teorias sociológicas, separando entre aquelas que apresentam uma “essência” do neoliberalismo (teorias foucaultiana, marxista, bourdieusiana e weberiana) e aquelas que preferem tratar da multiplicidade de manifestações históricas e geográficas singulares, enfatizando o caráter híbrido dos neoliberalismos (pós-colonialista, hibridismo governamental e neorregulacionista). Conclui-se apontando para a complementaridade dos alvos, mas também para as implicações estratégicas das diferentes opções teóricas.Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL2019-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/2392010.1590/s0102-6992-201934010009Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 34 No. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-239Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 34 Núm. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-239Sociedade e Estado; v. 34 n. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-2391980-54620102-6992reponame:Sociedade e Estadoinstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/23920/21747Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociedade e Estadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Daniel Pereira2019-05-07T19:33:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23920Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/oaiportaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br1980-54620102-6992opendoar:2019-05-07T19:33:08Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences
O que é o neoliberalismo? A renovação do debate nas ciências sociais
title What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences
spellingShingle What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences
Andrade, Daniel Pereira
Neoliberalismo
Ciências sociais
Crítica
Definição
História do conceito
Neoliberalism
Social sciences
Criticism
Definition
History of the concept
title_short What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences
title_full What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences
title_fullStr What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences
title_full_unstemmed What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences
title_sort What is neoliberalism? The renewal of the debate in social sciences
author Andrade, Daniel Pereira
author_facet Andrade, Daniel Pereira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Daniel Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neoliberalismo
Ciências sociais
Crítica
Definição
História do conceito
Neoliberalism
Social sciences
Criticism
Definition
History of the concept
topic Neoliberalismo
Ciências sociais
Crítica
Definição
História do conceito
Neoliberalism
Social sciences
Criticism
Definition
History of the concept
description The concept of neoliberalism has been retaken by the social sciences since 2000s, with the reopening of the international debate that seeks to give more precise definitions in its critical aspect. The main arguments against the use of the concept are analyzed and its use is defended due to its strategic importance. Definitions are grouped according to the main sociological theories, separating between those that present an "essence" of Neoliberalism (Foucaultian, Marxian, Bourdieusian and Weberian theories) and those that prefer to deal with the multiplicity of singular historical and geographical manifestations, emphasizing the hybrid character of neoliberalism (post-colonialist, governmental hybridism and neoregulationist theories). It concludes by pointing to the complementarity of the targets, but also to the strategic implications of different theoretical options, especially regarding the diagnosis of the "death" of neoliberalism after the financial crisis of 2008.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/23920
10.1590/s0102-6992-201934010009
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/23920
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s0102-6992-201934010009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/23920/21747
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociedade e Estado
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Sociedade e Estado
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Sociologia - UnB/SOL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 34 No. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-239
Sociedade e Estado; Vol. 34 Núm. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-239
Sociedade e Estado; v. 34 n. 01 (2019): Dossiê: Tecnologia e mercados culturais; 211-239
1980-5462
0102-6992
reponame:Sociedade e Estado
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Sociedade e Estado
collection Sociedade e Estado
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade e Estado - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv portaldeperiodicos@bce.unb.br||revistasol@unb.br
_version_ 1800211064696078336