A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Felisberto, Andrezza Feitosa
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Le Guerroué, Jean-Louis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2588
Resumo: Geographical indications (GIs) can become powerful development strategies for rural territories. The strengthening of rural tourism has become one of the priority development axes of the Ministry of Tourism. Several common factors exist between them such as scale of action, location in rural areas, agricultural activities among others, quality of landscapes, cultural and traditional aspects. Considering this confluence of elements, the present study tries to define which relations can be woven between rural tourism and geographical indications, trying to confirm or not the theory elaborated by Le Guerroué and Barjolle (2018), which advance the hypothesis that there are four possible types of interactions. By doing so, the work consists in associating the territories, identified by the municipalities, according to their classifications in terms of tourism development to the geographical areas defined in the codes of pratice ( CoP) of the geographical indications seeking from different sources to evaluate which activities are present in these common areas and in particular. which are directly associated with GIs. The data grouping made it possible to see the heterogeneity of tourism in the territories of geographical indications. The observed data confirmed the hypothesis identifying four types of interaction between the development of geographical indications and rural tourism. Complementary studies are needed to more accurately represent other variables not contemplated in this paper. Key-words: Geographical Indications. Rural Tourism. Interaction. Territorial Development.
id UNC - 1_0258f6f22543b544d6a0663dc7a70103
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2588
network_acronym_str UNC - 1
network_name_str DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
spelling A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indicationsA convergência entre o turismo rural e as indicações geográficas brasileirasGeographical indications (GIs) can become powerful development strategies for rural territories. The strengthening of rural tourism has become one of the priority development axes of the Ministry of Tourism. Several common factors exist between them such as scale of action, location in rural areas, agricultural activities among others, quality of landscapes, cultural and traditional aspects. Considering this confluence of elements, the present study tries to define which relations can be woven between rural tourism and geographical indications, trying to confirm or not the theory elaborated by Le Guerroué and Barjolle (2018), which advance the hypothesis that there are four possible types of interactions. By doing so, the work consists in associating the territories, identified by the municipalities, according to their classifications in terms of tourism development to the geographical areas defined in the codes of pratice ( CoP) of the geographical indications seeking from different sources to evaluate which activities are present in these common areas and in particular. which are directly associated with GIs. The data grouping made it possible to see the heterogeneity of tourism in the territories of geographical indications. The observed data confirmed the hypothesis identifying four types of interaction between the development of geographical indications and rural tourism. Complementary studies are needed to more accurately represent other variables not contemplated in this paper. Key-words: Geographical Indications. Rural Tourism. Interaction. Territorial Development.As indicações geográficas (IG) podem se tornar poderosas estratégias de desenvolvimento dos territórios rurais. O fortalecimento do turismo rural tornou-se um dos eixos prioritários de desenvolvimento do Ministério do Turismo. Diversos fatores comuns existem entre ambos como a escala de ação, a localização em meios rurais, as atividades agrícolas, entre outras, como a qualidade das paisagens, os aspectos culturais e tradicionais. Considerando essa confluência de elementos, o presente estudo tenta definir quais relações podem se tecer entre turismo rural e indicações geográficas buscando confirmar ou não a teoria elaborada por Le Guerroué e Barjolle (2018), que propõem a hipóteses de que existe quatro tipos de interações possíveis. Assim, o trabalho consiste em associar os territórios, identificados pelos munícipios, segundo suas classificações em termo de desenvolvimento turístico, às áreas geográficas definidas nos cadernos de especificações das indicações geográficas, buscando em fontes diversas avaliar quais atividades estão presentes nessas áreas comuns e em particular quais estão diretamente associadas às IGs. O agrupamento de dados possibilitou ver a heterogeneidade do turismo nos territórios das indicações geográficas. Os dados observados confirmaram a hipótese emitida, identificando quatro tipos de interação entre o desenvolvimento das indicações geográficas e do Turismo rural. Estudos complementares são necessários para representar de modo mais preciso outras variáveis não contempladas no presente trabalho. Palavras-chave: Indicações Geográficas. Turismo Rural. Interação. Desenvolvimento Territorial.Universidade do Contestado (UnC)2019-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/258810.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2588DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate; v. 9 n. Ed. esp. 2 (2019): Dossiê temático: Indicação Geográfica no Brasil e denominações afins em outros países; 248-2612237-902910.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2reponame:DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debateinstname:Universidade do Contestadoinstacron:UNCporhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2588/1250Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debateinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFelisberto, Andrezza FeitosaLe Guerroué, Jean-Louis2020-05-09T16:12:17Zhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/oai2237-90292237-9029opendoar:null2020-05-09 16:12:19.598DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate - Universidade do Contestadofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications
A convergência entre o turismo rural e as indicações geográficas brasileiras
title A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications
spellingShingle A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications
Felisberto, Andrezza Feitosa
title_short A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications
title_full A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications
title_fullStr A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications
title_full_unstemmed A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications
title_sort A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications
author Felisberto, Andrezza Feitosa
author_facet Felisberto, Andrezza Feitosa
Le Guerroué, Jean-Louis
author_role author
author2 Le Guerroué, Jean-Louis
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Felisberto, Andrezza Feitosa
Le Guerroué, Jean-Louis
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Geographical indications (GIs) can become powerful development strategies for rural territories. The strengthening of rural tourism has become one of the priority development axes of the Ministry of Tourism. Several common factors exist between them such as scale of action, location in rural areas, agricultural activities among others, quality of landscapes, cultural and traditional aspects. Considering this confluence of elements, the present study tries to define which relations can be woven between rural tourism and geographical indications, trying to confirm or not the theory elaborated by Le Guerroué and Barjolle (2018), which advance the hypothesis that there are four possible types of interactions. By doing so, the work consists in associating the territories, identified by the municipalities, according to their classifications in terms of tourism development to the geographical areas defined in the codes of pratice ( CoP) of the geographical indications seeking from different sources to evaluate which activities are present in these common areas and in particular. which are directly associated with GIs. The data grouping made it possible to see the heterogeneity of tourism in the territories of geographical indications. The observed data confirmed the hypothesis identifying four types of interaction between the development of geographical indications and rural tourism. Complementary studies are needed to more accurately represent other variables not contemplated in this paper. Key-words: Geographical Indications. Rural Tourism. Interaction. Territorial Development.
As indicações geográficas (IG) podem se tornar poderosas estratégias de desenvolvimento dos territórios rurais. O fortalecimento do turismo rural tornou-se um dos eixos prioritários de desenvolvimento do Ministério do Turismo. Diversos fatores comuns existem entre ambos como a escala de ação, a localização em meios rurais, as atividades agrícolas, entre outras, como a qualidade das paisagens, os aspectos culturais e tradicionais. Considerando essa confluência de elementos, o presente estudo tenta definir quais relações podem se tecer entre turismo rural e indicações geográficas buscando confirmar ou não a teoria elaborada por Le Guerroué e Barjolle (2018), que propõem a hipóteses de que existe quatro tipos de interações possíveis. Assim, o trabalho consiste em associar os territórios, identificados pelos munícipios, segundo suas classificações em termo de desenvolvimento turístico, às áreas geográficas definidas nos cadernos de especificações das indicações geográficas, buscando em fontes diversas avaliar quais atividades estão presentes nessas áreas comuns e em particular quais estão diretamente associadas às IGs. O agrupamento de dados possibilitou ver a heterogeneidade do turismo nos territórios das indicações geográficas. Os dados observados confirmaram a hipótese emitida, identificando quatro tipos de interação entre o desenvolvimento das indicações geográficas e do Turismo rural. Estudos complementares são necessários para representar de modo mais preciso outras variáveis não contempladas no presente trabalho. Palavras-chave: Indicações Geográficas. Turismo Rural. Interação. Desenvolvimento Territorial.
description Geographical indications (GIs) can become powerful development strategies for rural territories. The strengthening of rural tourism has become one of the priority development axes of the Ministry of Tourism. Several common factors exist between them such as scale of action, location in rural areas, agricultural activities among others, quality of landscapes, cultural and traditional aspects. Considering this confluence of elements, the present study tries to define which relations can be woven between rural tourism and geographical indications, trying to confirm or not the theory elaborated by Le Guerroué and Barjolle (2018), which advance the hypothesis that there are four possible types of interactions. By doing so, the work consists in associating the territories, identified by the municipalities, according to their classifications in terms of tourism development to the geographical areas defined in the codes of pratice ( CoP) of the geographical indications seeking from different sources to evaluate which activities are present in these common areas and in particular. which are directly associated with GIs. The data grouping made it possible to see the heterogeneity of tourism in the territories of geographical indications. The observed data confirmed the hypothesis identifying four types of interaction between the development of geographical indications and rural tourism. Complementary studies are needed to more accurately represent other variables not contemplated in this paper. Key-words: Geographical Indications. Rural Tourism. Interaction. Territorial Development.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2588
10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2588
url http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2588
identifier_str_mv 10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2588
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2588/1250
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Contestado (UnC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Contestado (UnC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate; v. 9 n. Ed. esp. 2 (2019): Dossiê temático: Indicação Geográfica no Brasil e denominações afins em outros países; 248-261
2237-9029
10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2
reponame:DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
instname:Universidade do Contestado
instacron:UNC
reponame_str DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
collection DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate
instname_str Universidade do Contestado
instacron_str UNC
institution UNC
repository.name.fl_str_mv DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate - Universidade do Contestado
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1666590362793148416