A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2588 |
Resumo: | Geographical indications (GIs) can become powerful development strategies for rural territories. The strengthening of rural tourism has become one of the priority development axes of the Ministry of Tourism. Several common factors exist between them such as scale of action, location in rural areas, agricultural activities among others, quality of landscapes, cultural and traditional aspects. Considering this confluence of elements, the present study tries to define which relations can be woven between rural tourism and geographical indications, trying to confirm or not the theory elaborated by Le Guerroué and Barjolle (2018), which advance the hypothesis that there are four possible types of interactions. By doing so, the work consists in associating the territories, identified by the municipalities, according to their classifications in terms of tourism development to the geographical areas defined in the codes of pratice ( CoP) of the geographical indications seeking from different sources to evaluate which activities are present in these common areas and in particular. which are directly associated with GIs. The data grouping made it possible to see the heterogeneity of tourism in the territories of geographical indications. The observed data confirmed the hypothesis identifying four types of interaction between the development of geographical indications and rural tourism. Complementary studies are needed to more accurately represent other variables not contemplated in this paper. Key-words: Geographical Indications. Rural Tourism. Interaction. Territorial Development. |
id |
UNC - 1_0258f6f22543b544d6a0663dc7a70103 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2588 |
network_acronym_str |
UNC - 1 |
network_name_str |
DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate |
spelling |
A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indicationsA convergência entre o turismo rural e as indicações geográficas brasileirasGeographical indications (GIs) can become powerful development strategies for rural territories. The strengthening of rural tourism has become one of the priority development axes of the Ministry of Tourism. Several common factors exist between them such as scale of action, location in rural areas, agricultural activities among others, quality of landscapes, cultural and traditional aspects. Considering this confluence of elements, the present study tries to define which relations can be woven between rural tourism and geographical indications, trying to confirm or not the theory elaborated by Le Guerroué and Barjolle (2018), which advance the hypothesis that there are four possible types of interactions. By doing so, the work consists in associating the territories, identified by the municipalities, according to their classifications in terms of tourism development to the geographical areas defined in the codes of pratice ( CoP) of the geographical indications seeking from different sources to evaluate which activities are present in these common areas and in particular. which are directly associated with GIs. The data grouping made it possible to see the heterogeneity of tourism in the territories of geographical indications. The observed data confirmed the hypothesis identifying four types of interaction between the development of geographical indications and rural tourism. Complementary studies are needed to more accurately represent other variables not contemplated in this paper. Key-words: Geographical Indications. Rural Tourism. Interaction. Territorial Development.As indicações geográficas (IG) podem se tornar poderosas estratégias de desenvolvimento dos territórios rurais. O fortalecimento do turismo rural tornou-se um dos eixos prioritários de desenvolvimento do Ministério do Turismo. Diversos fatores comuns existem entre ambos como a escala de ação, a localização em meios rurais, as atividades agrícolas, entre outras, como a qualidade das paisagens, os aspectos culturais e tradicionais. Considerando essa confluência de elementos, o presente estudo tenta definir quais relações podem se tecer entre turismo rural e indicações geográficas buscando confirmar ou não a teoria elaborada por Le Guerroué e Barjolle (2018), que propõem a hipóteses de que existe quatro tipos de interações possíveis. Assim, o trabalho consiste em associar os territórios, identificados pelos munícipios, segundo suas classificações em termo de desenvolvimento turístico, às áreas geográficas definidas nos cadernos de especificações das indicações geográficas, buscando em fontes diversas avaliar quais atividades estão presentes nessas áreas comuns e em particular quais estão diretamente associadas às IGs. O agrupamento de dados possibilitou ver a heterogeneidade do turismo nos territórios das indicações geográficas. Os dados observados confirmaram a hipótese emitida, identificando quatro tipos de interação entre o desenvolvimento das indicações geográficas e do Turismo rural. Estudos complementares são necessários para representar de modo mais preciso outras variáveis não contempladas no presente trabalho. Palavras-chave: Indicações Geográficas. Turismo Rural. Interação. Desenvolvimento Territorial.Universidade do Contestado (UnC)2019-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/258810.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2588DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate; v. 9 n. Ed. esp. 2 (2019): Dossiê temático: Indicação Geográfica no Brasil e denominações afins em outros países; 248-2612237-902910.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2reponame:DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debateinstname:Universidade do Contestadoinstacron:UNCporhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2588/1250Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debateinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFelisberto, Andrezza FeitosaLe Guerroué, Jean-Louis2020-05-09T16:12:17Zhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/oai2237-90292237-9029opendoar:null2020-05-09 16:12:19.598DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate - Universidade do Contestadofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications A convergência entre o turismo rural e as indicações geográficas brasileiras |
title |
A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications |
spellingShingle |
A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications Felisberto, Andrezza Feitosa |
title_short |
A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications |
title_full |
A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications |
title_fullStr |
A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications |
title_sort |
A Convergence between rural tourism and brazilian geographical indications |
author |
Felisberto, Andrezza Feitosa |
author_facet |
Felisberto, Andrezza Feitosa Le Guerroué, Jean-Louis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Le Guerroué, Jean-Louis |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Felisberto, Andrezza Feitosa Le Guerroué, Jean-Louis |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Geographical indications (GIs) can become powerful development strategies for rural territories. The strengthening of rural tourism has become one of the priority development axes of the Ministry of Tourism. Several common factors exist between them such as scale of action, location in rural areas, agricultural activities among others, quality of landscapes, cultural and traditional aspects. Considering this confluence of elements, the present study tries to define which relations can be woven between rural tourism and geographical indications, trying to confirm or not the theory elaborated by Le Guerroué and Barjolle (2018), which advance the hypothesis that there are four possible types of interactions. By doing so, the work consists in associating the territories, identified by the municipalities, according to their classifications in terms of tourism development to the geographical areas defined in the codes of pratice ( CoP) of the geographical indications seeking from different sources to evaluate which activities are present in these common areas and in particular. which are directly associated with GIs. The data grouping made it possible to see the heterogeneity of tourism in the territories of geographical indications. The observed data confirmed the hypothesis identifying four types of interaction between the development of geographical indications and rural tourism. Complementary studies are needed to more accurately represent other variables not contemplated in this paper. Key-words: Geographical Indications. Rural Tourism. Interaction. Territorial Development. As indicações geográficas (IG) podem se tornar poderosas estratégias de desenvolvimento dos territórios rurais. O fortalecimento do turismo rural tornou-se um dos eixos prioritários de desenvolvimento do Ministério do Turismo. Diversos fatores comuns existem entre ambos como a escala de ação, a localização em meios rurais, as atividades agrícolas, entre outras, como a qualidade das paisagens, os aspectos culturais e tradicionais. Considerando essa confluência de elementos, o presente estudo tenta definir quais relações podem se tecer entre turismo rural e indicações geográficas buscando confirmar ou não a teoria elaborada por Le Guerroué e Barjolle (2018), que propõem a hipóteses de que existe quatro tipos de interações possíveis. Assim, o trabalho consiste em associar os territórios, identificados pelos munícipios, segundo suas classificações em termo de desenvolvimento turístico, às áreas geográficas definidas nos cadernos de especificações das indicações geográficas, buscando em fontes diversas avaliar quais atividades estão presentes nessas áreas comuns e em particular quais estão diretamente associadas às IGs. O agrupamento de dados possibilitou ver a heterogeneidade do turismo nos territórios das indicações geográficas. Os dados observados confirmaram a hipótese emitida, identificando quatro tipos de interação entre o desenvolvimento das indicações geográficas e do Turismo rural. Estudos complementares são necessários para representar de modo mais preciso outras variáveis não contempladas no presente trabalho. Palavras-chave: Indicações Geográficas. Turismo Rural. Interação. Desenvolvimento Territorial. |
description |
Geographical indications (GIs) can become powerful development strategies for rural territories. The strengthening of rural tourism has become one of the priority development axes of the Ministry of Tourism. Several common factors exist between them such as scale of action, location in rural areas, agricultural activities among others, quality of landscapes, cultural and traditional aspects. Considering this confluence of elements, the present study tries to define which relations can be woven between rural tourism and geographical indications, trying to confirm or not the theory elaborated by Le Guerroué and Barjolle (2018), which advance the hypothesis that there are four possible types of interactions. By doing so, the work consists in associating the territories, identified by the municipalities, according to their classifications in terms of tourism development to the geographical areas defined in the codes of pratice ( CoP) of the geographical indications seeking from different sources to evaluate which activities are present in these common areas and in particular. which are directly associated with GIs. The data grouping made it possible to see the heterogeneity of tourism in the territories of geographical indications. The observed data confirmed the hypothesis identifying four types of interaction between the development of geographical indications and rural tourism. Complementary studies are needed to more accurately represent other variables not contemplated in this paper. Key-words: Geographical Indications. Rural Tourism. Interaction. Territorial Development. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2588 10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2588 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2588 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2.2588 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/drd/article/view/2588/1250 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Contestado (UnC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Contestado (UnC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate; v. 9 n. Ed. esp. 2 (2019): Dossiê temático: Indicação Geográfica no Brasil e denominações afins em outros países; 248-261 2237-9029 10.24302/drd.v9iEd. esp. 2 reponame:DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate instname:Universidade do Contestado instacron:UNC |
reponame_str |
DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate |
collection |
DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate |
instname_str |
Universidade do Contestado |
instacron_str |
UNC |
institution |
UNC |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
DRd - Desenvolvimento Regional em debate - Universidade do Contestado |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1666590362793148416 |