The paradox of sovereignty in the Supreme Federal Court: presumption of innocence, democracy and exception

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, João Paulo Soares e
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cunha, Karoline França Bastos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Profanações
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/1908
Resumo: This paper investigates the actions of the Federal Supreme Court in the judgment of the precautionary measures of Constitutional Declaratory Actions nº 43 and 44 in light of the paradox of sovereignty, introduced by Carl Schmitt and revisited by Giorgio Agamben in the series Homo Sacer. Based on a material approach to the judgments in question and using a bibliographical review and hypothetical deduction, it is sought to analyze the aforementioned judgment, which excluded the applicability of the presumption of innocence principle of the Brazilian legal system. The argumentative mesh assumes the hypothesis that the performance of the STF establishes an environment of constitutional indetermination through the arbitrary suspension of the validity of the normative text. Keywords: Democracy. Presumption of innocence. Constitutional interpretation. Paradox of sovereignty. State of exception.
id UNC-0_312aa445766e38b51f21f992a97a1572
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1908
network_acronym_str UNC-0
network_name_str Profanações
repository_id_str
spelling The paradox of sovereignty in the Supreme Federal Court: presumption of innocence, democracy and exceptionO paradoxo da soberania no Supremo Tribunal Federal: presunção de inocência, democracia e exceçãoThis paper investigates the actions of the Federal Supreme Court in the judgment of the precautionary measures of Constitutional Declaratory Actions nº 43 and 44 in light of the paradox of sovereignty, introduced by Carl Schmitt and revisited by Giorgio Agamben in the series Homo Sacer. Based on a material approach to the judgments in question and using a bibliographical review and hypothetical deduction, it is sought to analyze the aforementioned judgment, which excluded the applicability of the presumption of innocence principle of the Brazilian legal system. The argumentative mesh assumes the hypothesis that the performance of the STF establishes an environment of constitutional indetermination through the arbitrary suspension of the validity of the normative text. Keywords: Democracy. Presumption of innocence. Constitutional interpretation. Paradox of sovereignty. State of exception.O presente trabalho investiga a atuação do Supremo Tribunal Federal no julgamento das cautelares das Ações Declaratórias de Constitucionalidade nº 43 e 44 à luz do paradoxo da soberania, introduzido por Carl Schmitt e revisitado por Giorgio Agamben na série Homo Sacer. A partir de uma abordagem material dos julgamentos em questão e valendo-se de revisão bibliográfica e dedução hipotética, busca-se analisar o mencionado julgamento, que excluiu a aplicabilidade do princípio da presunção de inocência do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro. A malha argumentativa assume a hipótese de que a atuação do STF instaura um ambiente de indeterminação constitucional por meio da suspensão arbitrária da validade do texto normativo. Palavras-chave: Democracia. Presunção de inocência. Interpretação constitucional. Paradoxo da soberania. Estado de exceção.Universidade do Contestado (UnC)2019-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/190810.24302/prof.v6i0.1908Profanações; v. 6 (2019); 259-2752358-612510.24302/prof.v6i0reponame:Profanaçõesinstname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC)instacron:UNCporhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/1908/1186Copyright (c) 2019 Profanaçõesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, João Paulo Soares eCunha, Karoline França Bastos2020-04-25T03:43:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1908Revistahttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/PRIhttp://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/oai||sandro@unc.br2358-61252358-6125opendoar:2020-04-25T03:43:01Profanações - Universidade do Contestado (UNC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The paradox of sovereignty in the Supreme Federal Court: presumption of innocence, democracy and exception
O paradoxo da soberania no Supremo Tribunal Federal: presunção de inocência, democracia e exceção
title The paradox of sovereignty in the Supreme Federal Court: presumption of innocence, democracy and exception
spellingShingle The paradox of sovereignty in the Supreme Federal Court: presumption of innocence, democracy and exception
Silva, João Paulo Soares e
title_short The paradox of sovereignty in the Supreme Federal Court: presumption of innocence, democracy and exception
title_full The paradox of sovereignty in the Supreme Federal Court: presumption of innocence, democracy and exception
title_fullStr The paradox of sovereignty in the Supreme Federal Court: presumption of innocence, democracy and exception
title_full_unstemmed The paradox of sovereignty in the Supreme Federal Court: presumption of innocence, democracy and exception
title_sort The paradox of sovereignty in the Supreme Federal Court: presumption of innocence, democracy and exception
author Silva, João Paulo Soares e
author_facet Silva, João Paulo Soares e
Cunha, Karoline França Bastos
author_role author
author2 Cunha, Karoline França Bastos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, João Paulo Soares e
Cunha, Karoline França Bastos
description This paper investigates the actions of the Federal Supreme Court in the judgment of the precautionary measures of Constitutional Declaratory Actions nº 43 and 44 in light of the paradox of sovereignty, introduced by Carl Schmitt and revisited by Giorgio Agamben in the series Homo Sacer. Based on a material approach to the judgments in question and using a bibliographical review and hypothetical deduction, it is sought to analyze the aforementioned judgment, which excluded the applicability of the presumption of innocence principle of the Brazilian legal system. The argumentative mesh assumes the hypothesis that the performance of the STF establishes an environment of constitutional indetermination through the arbitrary suspension of the validity of the normative text. Keywords: Democracy. Presumption of innocence. Constitutional interpretation. Paradox of sovereignty. State of exception.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/1908
10.24302/prof.v6i0.1908
url http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/1908
identifier_str_mv 10.24302/prof.v6i0.1908
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.unc.br/index.php/prof/article/view/1908/1186
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Profanações
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Profanações
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Contestado (UnC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Contestado (UnC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Profanações; v. 6 (2019); 259-275
2358-6125
10.24302/prof.v6i0
reponame:Profanações
instname:Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
instacron:UNC
instname_str Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
instacron_str UNC
institution UNC
reponame_str Profanações
collection Profanações
repository.name.fl_str_mv Profanações - Universidade do Contestado (UNC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sandro@unc.br
_version_ 1797688249838206976

Registros relacionados