Influence of Different Obturation Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Doumani, Mazen
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Abdulrab, Saleem, Samran, Abdulaziz, Doumani, Ahmed, Layous, Kinda, Özcan, Mutlu
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348
Resumo: Objective: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled by different obturation systems. Material and methods: Ninety-six upper central incisors were used and decoronated, retaining 12 mm of the roots. On the basis of obturation systems, the roots were divided into 4 groups (n=24): Group1 (COGR): control group (unprepared, unfilled), Group 2 (AVGR): ActiV GP points/ActiV GP sealer, Group3 (GPGR): Gutta percha points/AH plus sealer, and Group4 (GAGR): Gutta percha points/ActiV GP sealer. The last three groups were obturated with the single cone technique. The roots were then stored in 100% relative humidity at 37 °C for 2 weeks. A vertical compressive force was exerted with a universal testing machine until a fracture occurred. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA. Results: Mean (SD) failure loads for groups ranged from 920.51 ± 210.37 to 1113.44 ± 489.42 N. The fracture resistance between the different study groups indicated no statistical difference. Conclusions: ActiV GP system did not exert a significant effect on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
id UNESP-20_c713c4ac35790fa9b9088120e146f01d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1348
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of Different Obturation Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated RootsObjective: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled by different obturation systems. Material and methods: Ninety-six upper central incisors were used and decoronated, retaining 12 mm of the roots. On the basis of obturation systems, the roots were divided into 4 groups (n=24): Group1 (COGR): control group (unprepared, unfilled), Group 2 (AVGR): ActiV GP points/ActiV GP sealer, Group3 (GPGR): Gutta percha points/AH plus sealer, and Group4 (GAGR): Gutta percha points/ActiV GP sealer. The last three groups were obturated with the single cone technique. The roots were then stored in 100% relative humidity at 37 °C for 2 weeks. A vertical compressive force was exerted with a universal testing machine until a fracture occurred. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA. Results: Mean (SD) failure loads for groups ranged from 920.51 ± 210.37 to 1113.44 ± 489.42 N. The fracture resistance between the different study groups indicated no statistical difference. Conclusions: ActiV GP system did not exert a significant effect on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2017-03-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed short communicationapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/134810.14295/bds.2017.v20i1.1348Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2017): Jan. - Mar. / 2017 - Published February 2017; 6-11Brazilian Dental Science; v. 20 n. 1 (2017): Jan. - Mar. / 2017 - Published February 2017; 6-112178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348/1095https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348/2851https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348/2852https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348/2853Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDoumani, MazenAbdulrab, SaleemSamran, AbdulazizDoumani, AhmedLayous, KindaÖzcan, Mutlu2020-01-28T12:15:37Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1348Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:10.284108Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of Different Obturation Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots
title Influence of Different Obturation Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots
spellingShingle Influence of Different Obturation Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots
Doumani, Mazen
title_short Influence of Different Obturation Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots
title_full Influence of Different Obturation Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots
title_fullStr Influence of Different Obturation Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Different Obturation Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots
title_sort Influence of Different Obturation Systems on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Roots
author Doumani, Mazen
author_facet Doumani, Mazen
Abdulrab, Saleem
Samran, Abdulaziz
Doumani, Ahmed
Layous, Kinda
Özcan, Mutlu
author_role author
author2 Abdulrab, Saleem
Samran, Abdulaziz
Doumani, Ahmed
Layous, Kinda
Özcan, Mutlu
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Doumani, Mazen
Abdulrab, Saleem
Samran, Abdulaziz
Doumani, Ahmed
Layous, Kinda
Özcan, Mutlu
description Objective: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled by different obturation systems. Material and methods: Ninety-six upper central incisors were used and decoronated, retaining 12 mm of the roots. On the basis of obturation systems, the roots were divided into 4 groups (n=24): Group1 (COGR): control group (unprepared, unfilled), Group 2 (AVGR): ActiV GP points/ActiV GP sealer, Group3 (GPGR): Gutta percha points/AH plus sealer, and Group4 (GAGR): Gutta percha points/ActiV GP sealer. The last three groups were obturated with the single cone technique. The roots were then stored in 100% relative humidity at 37 °C for 2 weeks. A vertical compressive force was exerted with a universal testing machine until a fracture occurred. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA. Results: Mean (SD) failure loads for groups ranged from 920.51 ± 210.37 to 1113.44 ± 489.42 N. The fracture resistance between the different study groups indicated no statistical difference. Conclusions: ActiV GP system did not exert a significant effect on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed short communication
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348
10.14295/bds.2017.v20i1.1348
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348
identifier_str_mv 10.14295/bds.2017.v20i1.1348
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348/1095
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348/2851
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348/2852
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1348/2853
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2017): Jan. - Mar. / 2017 - Published February 2017; 6-11
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 20 n. 1 (2017): Jan. - Mar. / 2017 - Published February 2017; 6-11
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1788346899808387072