Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa eng |
Título da fonte: | Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546 |
Resumo: | There is empirical evidence in different languages on how the computation of gender morphology during psycholinguistic processing affects the conformation of sex-generic representations. However, there is no empirical evidence on the processing of non-binary morphological variants in Spanish (-x or -e) in contrast to the generic masculine variant (-o). To analyze this phenomenon, we conducted two experiments: an acceptability judgment task and a sentence comprehension task. The results show differences depending on the task. This means that the underlying processes put into play in each one generate different effects. In acceptability judgments, which involve strategic processes mediated by beliefs and the linguistic norm, the generic masculine is more acceptable to refer to mixed groups. In the sentence comprehension task, which inquires about automatic processes and implicit representations, the non-binary forms consistently elicited a reference to mixed groups. Furthermore, the response times indicated that these morphological variants do not entail a higher processing cost than the generic masculine. |
id |
UNESP-4_85b968f21c2dc205ab69a7545d5feb6c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14546 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-4 |
network_name_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task¿Binario o no binario? Morfología de género en español: diferencias dependientes de la tareapsicolingüísticagéneromorfologíaestereotipos de géneropsycholinguisticsgendermorphologygender stereotypesThere is empirical evidence in different languages on how the computation of gender morphology during psycholinguistic processing affects the conformation of sex-generic representations. However, there is no empirical evidence on the processing of non-binary morphological variants in Spanish (-x or -e) in contrast to the generic masculine variant (-o). To analyze this phenomenon, we conducted two experiments: an acceptability judgment task and a sentence comprehension task. The results show differences depending on the task. This means that the underlying processes put into play in each one generate different effects. In acceptability judgments, which involve strategic processes mediated by beliefs and the linguistic norm, the generic masculine is more acceptable to refer to mixed groups. In the sentence comprehension task, which inquires about automatic processes and implicit representations, the non-binary forms consistently elicited a reference to mixed groups. Furthermore, the response times indicated that these morphological variants do not entail a higher processing cost than the generic masculine.Existe evidencia empírica en distintas lenguas sobre cómo la computación de la morfología de género durante el procesamiento psicolingüístico incide en la conformación de representaciones sexo-genéricas. Sin embargo, no existe evidencia empírica sobre el procesamiento de variantes morfológicas no binarias en español (-x o -e) en contraste con la variante de masculino genérico (-o). Para analizar este fenómeno, realizamos dos experimentos: una tarea de juicios de aceptabilidad y una de comprensión de oraciones para evaluar procesamiento online. Los resultados muestran diferencias dependientes de la tarea, es decir, de los procesos subyacentes que se ponen en juego en cada una. En los juicios de aceptabilidad, que involucran procesos estratégicos mediados por las creencias y la norma lingüística, el masculino genérico resulta más aceptable para referir a grupos mixtos. En la tarea de comprensión de oraciones, que indaga sobre procesos automáticos y representaciones implícitas, las formas no binarias provocaron consistentemente una referencia hacia grupos mixtos y los tiempos de respuesta indicaron que estas variantes morfológicas no conllevan un costo de procesamiento mayor que el masculino genérico.UNESP2022-10-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1454610.1590/1981-5794-e14546ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 66 (2022)1981-5794reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPspaenghttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546/14324https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546/14325Copyright (c) 2022 ALFA: Revista de Linguísticahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZunino, Gabriela MarielStetie, Noelia Ayelén2023-02-17T18:05:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14546Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-5794&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpalfa@unesp.br1981-57940002-5216opendoar:2023-02-17T18:05:59Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task ¿Binario o no binario? Morfología de género en español: diferencias dependientes de la tarea |
title |
Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task |
spellingShingle |
Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task Zunino, Gabriela Mariel psicolingüística género morfología estereotipos de género psycholinguistics gender morphology gender stereotypes |
title_short |
Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task |
title_full |
Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task |
title_fullStr |
Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task |
title_full_unstemmed |
Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task |
title_sort |
Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task |
author |
Zunino, Gabriela Mariel |
author_facet |
Zunino, Gabriela Mariel Stetie, Noelia Ayelén |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Stetie, Noelia Ayelén |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zunino, Gabriela Mariel Stetie, Noelia Ayelén |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
psicolingüística género morfología estereotipos de género psycholinguistics gender morphology gender stereotypes |
topic |
psicolingüística género morfología estereotipos de género psycholinguistics gender morphology gender stereotypes |
description |
There is empirical evidence in different languages on how the computation of gender morphology during psycholinguistic processing affects the conformation of sex-generic representations. However, there is no empirical evidence on the processing of non-binary morphological variants in Spanish (-x or -e) in contrast to the generic masculine variant (-o). To analyze this phenomenon, we conducted two experiments: an acceptability judgment task and a sentence comprehension task. The results show differences depending on the task. This means that the underlying processes put into play in each one generate different effects. In acceptability judgments, which involve strategic processes mediated by beliefs and the linguistic norm, the generic masculine is more acceptable to refer to mixed groups. In the sentence comprehension task, which inquires about automatic processes and implicit representations, the non-binary forms consistently elicited a reference to mixed groups. Furthermore, the response times indicated that these morphological variants do not entail a higher processing cost than the generic masculine. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546 10.1590/1981-5794-e14546 |
url |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-5794-e14546 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa eng |
language |
spa eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546/14324 https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546/14325 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 ALFA: Revista de Linguística https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 ALFA: Revista de Linguística https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 66 (2022) 1981-5794 reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
collection |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alfa@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800214378003300352 |