Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zunino, Gabriela Mariel
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Stetie, Noelia Ayelén
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
eng
Título da fonte: Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546
Resumo: There is empirical evidence in different languages on how the computation of gender morphology during psycholinguistic processing affects the conformation of sex-generic representations. However, there is no empirical evidence on the processing of non-binary morphological variants in Spanish (-x or -e) in contrast to the generic masculine variant (-o). To analyze this phenomenon, we conducted two experiments: an acceptability judgment task and a sentence comprehension task. The results show differences depending on the task. This means that the underlying processes put into play in each one generate different effects. In acceptability judgments, which involve strategic processes mediated by beliefs and the linguistic norm, the generic masculine is more acceptable to refer to mixed groups. In the sentence comprehension task, which inquires about automatic processes and implicit representations, the non-binary forms consistently elicited a reference to mixed groups. Furthermore, the response times indicated that these morphological variants do not entail a higher processing cost than the generic masculine.
id UNESP-4_85b968f21c2dc205ab69a7545d5feb6c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14546
network_acronym_str UNESP-4
network_name_str Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task¿Binario o no binario? Morfología de género en español: diferencias dependientes de la tareapsicolingüísticagéneromorfologíaestereotipos de géneropsycholinguisticsgendermorphologygender stereotypesThere is empirical evidence in different languages on how the computation of gender morphology during psycholinguistic processing affects the conformation of sex-generic representations. However, there is no empirical evidence on the processing of non-binary morphological variants in Spanish (-x or -e) in contrast to the generic masculine variant (-o). To analyze this phenomenon, we conducted two experiments: an acceptability judgment task and a sentence comprehension task. The results show differences depending on the task. This means that the underlying processes put into play in each one generate different effects. In acceptability judgments, which involve strategic processes mediated by beliefs and the linguistic norm, the generic masculine is more acceptable to refer to mixed groups. In the sentence comprehension task, which inquires about automatic processes and implicit representations, the non-binary forms consistently elicited a reference to mixed groups. Furthermore, the response times indicated that these morphological variants do not entail a higher processing cost than the generic masculine.Existe evidencia empírica en distintas lenguas sobre cómo la computación de la morfología de género durante el procesamiento psicolingüístico incide en la conformación de representaciones sexo-genéricas. Sin embargo, no existe evidencia empírica sobre el procesamiento de variantes morfológicas no binarias en español (-x o -e) en contraste con la variante de masculino genérico (-o). Para analizar este fenómeno, realizamos dos experimentos: una tarea de juicios de aceptabilidad y una de comprensión de oraciones para evaluar procesamiento online. Los resultados muestran diferencias dependientes de la tarea, es decir, de los procesos subyacentes que se ponen en juego en cada una. En los juicios de aceptabilidad, que involucran procesos estratégicos mediados por las creencias y la norma lingüística, el masculino genérico resulta más aceptable para referir a grupos mixtos. En la tarea de comprensión de oraciones, que indaga sobre procesos automáticos y representaciones implícitas, las formas no binarias provocaron consistentemente una referencia hacia grupos mixtos y los tiempos de respuesta indicaron que estas variantes morfológicas no conllevan un costo de procesamiento mayor que el masculino genérico.UNESP2022-10-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1454610.1590/1981-5794-e14546ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 66 (2022)1981-5794reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPspaenghttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546/14324https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546/14325Copyright (c) 2022 ALFA: Revista de Linguísticahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZunino, Gabriela MarielStetie, Noelia Ayelén2023-02-17T18:05:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14546Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-5794&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpalfa@unesp.br1981-57940002-5216opendoar:2023-02-17T18:05:59Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task
¿Binario o no binario? Morfología de género en español: diferencias dependientes de la tarea
title Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task
spellingShingle Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task
Zunino, Gabriela Mariel
psicolingüística
género
morfología
estereotipos de género
psycholinguistics
gender
morphology
gender stereotypes
title_short Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task
title_full Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task
title_fullStr Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task
title_full_unstemmed Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task
title_sort Binary or non-binary? Gender morphology in Spanish: differences dependent on the task
author Zunino, Gabriela Mariel
author_facet Zunino, Gabriela Mariel
Stetie, Noelia Ayelén
author_role author
author2 Stetie, Noelia Ayelén
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zunino, Gabriela Mariel
Stetie, Noelia Ayelén
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv psicolingüística
género
morfología
estereotipos de género
psycholinguistics
gender
morphology
gender stereotypes
topic psicolingüística
género
morfología
estereotipos de género
psycholinguistics
gender
morphology
gender stereotypes
description There is empirical evidence in different languages on how the computation of gender morphology during psycholinguistic processing affects the conformation of sex-generic representations. However, there is no empirical evidence on the processing of non-binary morphological variants in Spanish (-x or -e) in contrast to the generic masculine variant (-o). To analyze this phenomenon, we conducted two experiments: an acceptability judgment task and a sentence comprehension task. The results show differences depending on the task. This means that the underlying processes put into play in each one generate different effects. In acceptability judgments, which involve strategic processes mediated by beliefs and the linguistic norm, the generic masculine is more acceptable to refer to mixed groups. In the sentence comprehension task, which inquires about automatic processes and implicit representations, the non-binary forms consistently elicited a reference to mixed groups. Furthermore, the response times indicated that these morphological variants do not entail a higher processing cost than the generic masculine.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546
10.1590/1981-5794-e14546
url https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1981-5794-e14546
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546/14324
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/14546/14325
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 ALFA: Revista de Linguística
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 ALFA: Revista de Linguística
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNESP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNESP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 66 (2022)
1981-5794
reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)
collection Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alfa@unesp.br
_version_ 1800214378003300352