CONSENSUS AND DISSENT IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/2303 |
Resumo: | The article discusses the theoretical ambiguities and conceptual vagueness present in the restorative justice movement. Based on the review of classical contributions and the ongoing international controversy, we systematize the elements that constitute the core of the restorative international consensus and the central elements of the dissent that has been growing, especially the contrasting positions between the "purist" and "maximalist" visions. We then examine, based on a search through Google Scholar, the ten articles published in Portuguese and authored by Brazilian researchers best placed in the bibliometric ranking of the Publish or Perish software. We find that the previously discussed theoretical ambiguities and indefinitions make restorative strands possible in Brazil with contrasting positions, which suggests the need for a more consistent theoretical basis for the restorative movement. We conclude by suggesting a path for overcoming some of the existing polarizations. |
id |
UNIBRASIL-1_5bf84884d351770faf17e0427472d2b3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2303 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIBRASIL-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CONSENSUS AND DISSENT IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICECONSENSO E DISSENSO NA JUSTIÇA RESTAURATIVAThe article discusses the theoretical ambiguities and conceptual vagueness present in the restorative justice movement. Based on the review of classical contributions and the ongoing international controversy, we systematize the elements that constitute the core of the restorative international consensus and the central elements of the dissent that has been growing, especially the contrasting positions between the "purist" and "maximalist" visions. We then examine, based on a search through Google Scholar, the ten articles published in Portuguese and authored by Brazilian researchers best placed in the bibliometric ranking of the Publish or Perish software. We find that the previously discussed theoretical ambiguities and indefinitions make restorative strands possible in Brazil with contrasting positions, which suggests the need for a more consistent theoretical basis for the restorative movement. We conclude by suggesting a path for overcoming some of the existing polarizations.O artigo discute as ambiguidades teóricas e indefinições conceituais presentes no movimento da justiça restaurativa. A partir da revisão das contribuições clássicas e da polêmica internacional em curso, sistematizamos os elementos que constituem o núcleo de consenso internacional restaurativo e os elementos centrais do dissenso que tem se ampliado, especialmente a partir das visões “purista” e “maximalista”. Examinamos, então, em pesquisa no Google Scholar, os dez artigos publicados em português de autoria de autores brasileiros mais bem situados no ranking bibliométrico do software Publish or Perish. Encontramos que as referidas ambiguidades e indefinições tornam possível vertentes restaurativas no Brasil com posições contrastantes, o que sugere a necessidade de uma base teórica mais consistente para o movimento restaurativo. Concluímos sugerindo um caminho para a superação de algumas das polarizações existentes.Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil2023-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/230310.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v28i12303Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; v. 28 n. 1 (2023): v. 28 n. 1 (2023): Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; 149-174Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2023): v. 28 n. 1 (2023): Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; 149-1741982-0496reponame:Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democraciainstname:Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil)instacron:UNIBRASILporhttps://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/2303/769Copyright (c) 2023 Marcos Rolimhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRolim, Marcos2023-04-30T15:32:40Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2303Revistahttp://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfdONGhttps://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/oairevistadfd@unibrasil.com.br||ebgomes@me.com1982-04961982-0496opendoar:2023-04-30T15:32:40Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia - Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CONSENSUS AND DISSENT IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE CONSENSO E DISSENSO NA JUSTIÇA RESTAURATIVA |
title |
CONSENSUS AND DISSENT IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE |
spellingShingle |
CONSENSUS AND DISSENT IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE Rolim, Marcos |
title_short |
CONSENSUS AND DISSENT IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE |
title_full |
CONSENSUS AND DISSENT IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE |
title_fullStr |
CONSENSUS AND DISSENT IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE |
title_full_unstemmed |
CONSENSUS AND DISSENT IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE |
title_sort |
CONSENSUS AND DISSENT IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE |
author |
Rolim, Marcos |
author_facet |
Rolim, Marcos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rolim, Marcos |
description |
The article discusses the theoretical ambiguities and conceptual vagueness present in the restorative justice movement. Based on the review of classical contributions and the ongoing international controversy, we systematize the elements that constitute the core of the restorative international consensus and the central elements of the dissent that has been growing, especially the contrasting positions between the "purist" and "maximalist" visions. We then examine, based on a search through Google Scholar, the ten articles published in Portuguese and authored by Brazilian researchers best placed in the bibliometric ranking of the Publish or Perish software. We find that the previously discussed theoretical ambiguities and indefinitions make restorative strands possible in Brazil with contrasting positions, which suggests the need for a more consistent theoretical basis for the restorative movement. We conclude by suggesting a path for overcoming some of the existing polarizations. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/2303 10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v28i12303 |
url |
https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/2303 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v28i12303 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/2303/769 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Marcos Rolim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Marcos Rolim https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; v. 28 n. 1 (2023): v. 28 n. 1 (2023): Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; 149-174 Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2023): v. 28 n. 1 (2023): Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; 149-174 1982-0496 reponame:Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia instname:Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil) instacron:UNIBRASIL |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil) |
instacron_str |
UNIBRASIL |
institution |
UNIBRASIL |
reponame_str |
Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia |
collection |
Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia - Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadfd@unibrasil.com.br||ebgomes@me.com |
_version_ |
1800216470924296192 |