Dialogue in campaign: an analysis of the communicative strategies of confrontation in the Brazilian presidential election of 2014

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Marcia
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Opinião Pública (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658122
Resumo: This article intends to identify the dialogue, as well as its nature and contribution to the clarification of the electoral proposals, of the three main candidates competing in the 2014 presidential elections: Dilma Rousseff (PT), Aécio Neves (PSDB), and Marina Silva (PSB). The primary source of information was the Free Time of Electoral Advertising (block and spots) aired during the two rounds of the elections. The first objective was to elaborate a quantitative analysis of the occurrence of direct dialogue between the candidacies, identifying the candidates who had the most dialogue. The second objective was to qualify the nature of the dialogue undertaken by each candidacy, classifying it based on three categories: deconstruction of personal image; deconstruction of political image; criticism of the opponent’s political project. Such classification will assess to what extent the dialogue between the candidates has allowed discerning with greater or lesser clarity the ideological-political contours between the governmental projects in dispute. It is concluded that the occurrence of dialogue between the candidates in 2014 was increased by the sudden rise in competitiveness of the campaign.
id UNICAMP-10_2c0e8ba35b9d0fac074f3dc0a8d14c8a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8658122
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-10
network_name_str Opinião Pública (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Dialogue in campaign: an analysis of the communicative strategies of confrontation in the Brazilian presidential election of 2014 Diálogo en campaña: un análisis de las estrategias comunicativas de confrontación en la elección presidencial brasileña de 2014 Diálogo em campanha: uma análise das estratégias comunicativas de confronto na eleição presidencial brasileira de 2014 Electoral campaignDialogueDemocracyElections.Campaña electoralDiálogoDemocraciaElecciones.Campanha eleitoralDiálogoDemocraciaEleições.This article intends to identify the dialogue, as well as its nature and contribution to the clarification of the electoral proposals, of the three main candidates competing in the 2014 presidential elections: Dilma Rousseff (PT), Aécio Neves (PSDB), and Marina Silva (PSB). The primary source of information was the Free Time of Electoral Advertising (block and spots) aired during the two rounds of the elections. The first objective was to elaborate a quantitative analysis of the occurrence of direct dialogue between the candidacies, identifying the candidates who had the most dialogue. The second objective was to qualify the nature of the dialogue undertaken by each candidacy, classifying it based on three categories: deconstruction of personal image; deconstruction of political image; criticism of the opponent’s political project. Such classification will assess to what extent the dialogue between the candidates has allowed discerning with greater or lesser clarity the ideological-political contours between the governmental projects in dispute. It is concluded that the occurrence of dialogue between the candidates in 2014 was increased by the sudden rise in competitiveness of the campaign.Este artículo pretende identificar la ocurrencia del diálogo, su naturaleza y contribución a la aclaración de las propuestas electorales de las tres principales candidaturas en disputa en las elecciones presidenciales de 2014: Dilma Rousseff (PT), Aécio Neves (PSDB) y Marina Silva (PSB). La principal fuente de información fue el programa Horário Gratuito de Propaganda Eleitoral (block and spots) conducido durante los dos turnos de las elecciones. El primer objetivo fue elaborar un análisis cuantitativo de la ocurrencia del diálogo directo entre las candidaturas. El segundo objetivo era calificar la naturaleza del diálogo que se emprendió por cada candidatura, clasificarla en tres categorías: deconstrucción de la imagen personal, deconstrucción de la imagen política, crítica al proyecto político defendido por el oponente. Esta clasificación nos permitió evaluar hasta qué punto el diálogo entre los candidatos permitía discernir sobre los contornos político-ideológicos de los proyectos gubernamentales en disputa con mayor o menor claridad. Se concluye que la aparición del diálogo entre los presidenciables en 2014 se vio potenciada por el repentino aumento de la competitividad de la campaña.Este artigo pretende identificar a ocorrência do diálogo, sua natureza e contribuição para o esclarecimento das propostas eleitorais das três principais candidaturas em disputa nas eleições presidenciais de 2014: Dilma Rousseff (PT), Aécio Neves (PSDB) e Marina Silva (PSB). A fonte primordial de informações foi o Horário Gratuito de Propaganda Eleitoral – HGPE (bloco e spots) veiculado durante os dois turnos das eleições. O primeiro objetivo foi elaborar uma análise quantitativa da ocorrência do diálogo direto entre as candidaturas. O segundo objetivo foi qualificar a natureza desse diálogo, classificando-o em três categorias: desconstrução da imagem pessoal, desconstrução da imagem política e crítica ao projeto político defendido pelo adversário. Tal classificação permitiu avaliar em que medida o diálogo entre os candidatos possibilitou discernir com maior ou menor clareza os contornos políticoideológicos entre os projetos governamentais em disputa. Conclui-se que a ocorrência do diálogo entre os presidenciáveis em 2014 foi potencializada pelo aumento súbito da competitividade da campanha.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2019-10-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658122Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 660-693Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 660-693Opinião Pública; v. 25 n. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 660-6931807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658122/22000Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoDias, Marciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-02-28T12:25:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8658122Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2020-02-28T12:25:14Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dialogue in campaign: an analysis of the communicative strategies of confrontation in the Brazilian presidential election of 2014
Diálogo en campaña: un análisis de las estrategias comunicativas de confrontación en la elección presidencial brasileña de 2014
Diálogo em campanha: uma análise das estratégias comunicativas de confronto na eleição presidencial brasileira de 2014
title Dialogue in campaign: an analysis of the communicative strategies of confrontation in the Brazilian presidential election of 2014
spellingShingle Dialogue in campaign: an analysis of the communicative strategies of confrontation in the Brazilian presidential election of 2014
Dias, Marcia
Electoral campaign
Dialogue
Democracy
Elections.
Campaña electoral
Diálogo
Democracia
Elecciones.
Campanha eleitoral
Diálogo
Democracia
Eleições.
title_short Dialogue in campaign: an analysis of the communicative strategies of confrontation in the Brazilian presidential election of 2014
title_full Dialogue in campaign: an analysis of the communicative strategies of confrontation in the Brazilian presidential election of 2014
title_fullStr Dialogue in campaign: an analysis of the communicative strategies of confrontation in the Brazilian presidential election of 2014
title_full_unstemmed Dialogue in campaign: an analysis of the communicative strategies of confrontation in the Brazilian presidential election of 2014
title_sort Dialogue in campaign: an analysis of the communicative strategies of confrontation in the Brazilian presidential election of 2014
author Dias, Marcia
author_facet Dias, Marcia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Marcia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Electoral campaign
Dialogue
Democracy
Elections.
Campaña electoral
Diálogo
Democracia
Elecciones.
Campanha eleitoral
Diálogo
Democracia
Eleições.
topic Electoral campaign
Dialogue
Democracy
Elections.
Campaña electoral
Diálogo
Democracia
Elecciones.
Campanha eleitoral
Diálogo
Democracia
Eleições.
description This article intends to identify the dialogue, as well as its nature and contribution to the clarification of the electoral proposals, of the three main candidates competing in the 2014 presidential elections: Dilma Rousseff (PT), Aécio Neves (PSDB), and Marina Silva (PSB). The primary source of information was the Free Time of Electoral Advertising (block and spots) aired during the two rounds of the elections. The first objective was to elaborate a quantitative analysis of the occurrence of direct dialogue between the candidacies, identifying the candidates who had the most dialogue. The second objective was to qualify the nature of the dialogue undertaken by each candidacy, classifying it based on three categories: deconstruction of personal image; deconstruction of political image; criticism of the opponent’s political project. Such classification will assess to what extent the dialogue between the candidates has allowed discerning with greater or lesser clarity the ideological-political contours between the governmental projects in dispute. It is concluded that the occurrence of dialogue between the candidates in 2014 was increased by the sudden rise in competitiveness of the campaign.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658122
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658122
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8658122/22000
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
Brasil; Contemporáneo
Brasil; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 660-693
Opinião Pública; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 660-693
Opinião Pública; v. 25 n. 3 (2019): set./dez.; 660-693
1807-0191
reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Opinião Pública (Online)
collection Opinião Pública (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br
_version_ 1800217018088030208