Corruption in the perception of Brazilian society: persistence and resilience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Emmanuel Nunes de
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Moisés, José Álvaro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Opinião Pública (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8674542
Resumo: Political corruption is one of the most severe and complex problems facing new and old democracies. Fundamentally, it involves the abuse of public power for any kind of private benefit, including advantages to governing parties over their opposition. It thus defeats the principle of political equality inherent in democracy, as its protagonists can obtain or maintain power and political benefits disproportionate to what they would achieve through legitimate and forms of political competition. At the same time, it distorts the republican dimension of democracy because it makes public policies result, not from debate and public dispute between different projects, but from behind-the-scenes agreements that favor spurious interests. Despite the efficiency of classical methodological instruments such as opinion polls with structured questionnaires and qualitative research with focus groups, it is still possible to identify biases in the quality of the information collected on corruption. This article aims to address this issue by introducing two survey experiments, one conducted in 2014 and one in 2018. The 2014 survey indicated that there is a substantive difference between the direct question and the experimental question. The level of tolerance for corruption is much higher than the other methodological instruments point out. Comparison with the 2018 experiment allowed the validation and extrapolation of the results found by Moisés and Nunes de Oliveira (2018).
id UNICAMP-10_9fcbc5e5ff87058d50bd46fc3f76d06e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8674542
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-10
network_name_str Opinião Pública (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Corruption in the perception of Brazilian society: persistence and resilienceLa corrupción según la percepción de la sociedad brasileña: persistencia y resilienciaA corrupção na percepção da sociedade brasileira: persistência e resiliênciacorruption persistenceresiliencepublic opinionbiasexperimental designdemocraciacorrupção políticaopinião públicademocracíacorrupción políticaopinión públicaPolitical corruption is one of the most severe and complex problems facing new and old democracies. Fundamentally, it involves the abuse of public power for any kind of private benefit, including advantages to governing parties over their opposition. It thus defeats the principle of political equality inherent in democracy, as its protagonists can obtain or maintain power and political benefits disproportionate to what they would achieve through legitimate and forms of political competition. At the same time, it distorts the republican dimension of democracy because it makes public policies result, not from debate and public dispute between different projects, but from behind-the-scenes agreements that favor spurious interests. Despite the efficiency of classical methodological instruments such as opinion polls with structured questionnaires and qualitative research with focus groups, it is still possible to identify biases in the quality of the information collected on corruption. This article aims to address this issue by introducing two survey experiments, one conducted in 2014 and one in 2018. The 2014 survey indicated that there is a substantive difference between the direct question and the experimental question. The level of tolerance for corruption is much higher than the other methodological instruments point out. Comparison with the 2018 experiment allowed the validation and extrapolation of the results found by Moisés and Nunes de Oliveira (2018).La corrupción política es uno de los problemas más graves y complejos que enfrentan las nuevas y viejas democracias. Fundamentalmente, implica en el abuso del poder público para cualquier tipo de beneficio privado, incluidas las ventajas de los partidos de gobierno sobre su oposición. Derrota así el principio de igualdad política inherente a la democracia, ya que sus protagonistas pueden obtener o mantener poder y beneficios políticos desproporcionados a los que lograrían a través de formas legítimas y legales de competir políticamente. Al mismo tiempo, distorsiona la dimensión republicana de la democracia porque hace que las políticas públicas resulten no del debate y la disputa pública entre diferentes proyectos, sino de acuerdos entre bastidores que favorecen intereses espurios. A pesar de la eficiencia de los instrumentos metodológicos clásicos, como las encuestas de opinión con cuestionario estructurado y la investigación cualitativa con grupos focales, aún es posible identificar sesgos en la calidad de la información recolectada sobre corrupción. Este artículo tiene como objetivo abordar este problema mediante la introducción de dos experimentos de encuesta, uno realizado en 2014 y otro en 2018. La encuesta de 2014 indicó que existe una diferencia sustancial entre la pregunta directa y la pregunta experimental. El nivel de tolerancia a la corrupción es muy superior al que señalan los demás instrumentos metodológicos. La comparación con el experimento de 2018 permitió la validación y extrapolación de los resultados encontrados por Moisés y Nunes de Oliveira (2018).A corrupção política é um dos problemas mais graves e complexos enfrentados pelas novas e velhas democracias. Fundamentalmente, ela envolve o abuso de poder público para qualquer tipo de benefício privado, incluindo vantagens para partidos de governo. Desqualifica, assim, o princípio de igualdade política inerente à democracia, pois seus protagonistas podem obter ou manter poder e benefícios políticos desproporcionais ao que conseguiriam por meio de formas legítimas e legais de competir politicamente. Ao mesmo tempo, a corrupção distorce a dimensão republicana da democracia porque faz com que as políticas públicas resultem, não do debate e da disputa pública entre diferentes projetos, mas de acordos de bastidores que favorecem interesses espúrios. Apesar da eficiência de instrumentos metodológicos clássicos como pesquisas de opinião com questionário estruturado e pesquisas qualitativas com grupos focais, ainda é possível identificar vieses na qualidade das informações coletadas sobre corrupção. Este artigo visa abordar essa questão apresentando dois experimentos de pesquisa, um realizado em 2014 e outro em 2018. A pesquisa de 2014 indicou que há uma diferença substantiva entre a pergunta direta e a pergunta experimental. O nível de tolerância à corrupção é muito superior ao apontado por outros instrumentos metodológicos. A comparação com o experimento de 2018 permitiu a validação e extrapolação dos resultados encontrados por Moisés e Nunes de Oliveira (2018).Universidade Estadual de Campinas2023-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8674542Opinião Pública; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2023): May/Aug.; p. 270-303Opinião Pública; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2023): mayo/ago.; p. 270-303Opinião Pública; v. 29 n. 2 (2023): maio/ago.; p. 270-3031807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8674542/32475Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2023 Opinião Públicahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Emmanuel Nunes deMoisés, José Álvaro2023-09-14T16:20:36Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8674542Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2023-09-14T16:20:36Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Corruption in the perception of Brazilian society: persistence and resilience
La corrupción según la percepción de la sociedad brasileña: persistencia y resiliencia
A corrupção na percepção da sociedade brasileira: persistência e resiliência
title Corruption in the perception of Brazilian society: persistence and resilience
spellingShingle Corruption in the perception of Brazilian society: persistence and resilience
Oliveira, Emmanuel Nunes de
corruption persistence
resilience
public opinion
bias
experimental design
democracia
corrupção política
opinião pública
democracía
corrupción política
opinión pública
title_short Corruption in the perception of Brazilian society: persistence and resilience
title_full Corruption in the perception of Brazilian society: persistence and resilience
title_fullStr Corruption in the perception of Brazilian society: persistence and resilience
title_full_unstemmed Corruption in the perception of Brazilian society: persistence and resilience
title_sort Corruption in the perception of Brazilian society: persistence and resilience
author Oliveira, Emmanuel Nunes de
author_facet Oliveira, Emmanuel Nunes de
Moisés, José Álvaro
author_role author
author2 Moisés, José Álvaro
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Emmanuel Nunes de
Moisés, José Álvaro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv corruption persistence
resilience
public opinion
bias
experimental design
democracia
corrupção política
opinião pública
democracía
corrupción política
opinión pública
topic corruption persistence
resilience
public opinion
bias
experimental design
democracia
corrupção política
opinião pública
democracía
corrupción política
opinión pública
description Political corruption is one of the most severe and complex problems facing new and old democracies. Fundamentally, it involves the abuse of public power for any kind of private benefit, including advantages to governing parties over their opposition. It thus defeats the principle of political equality inherent in democracy, as its protagonists can obtain or maintain power and political benefits disproportionate to what they would achieve through legitimate and forms of political competition. At the same time, it distorts the republican dimension of democracy because it makes public policies result, not from debate and public dispute between different projects, but from behind-the-scenes agreements that favor spurious interests. Despite the efficiency of classical methodological instruments such as opinion polls with structured questionnaires and qualitative research with focus groups, it is still possible to identify biases in the quality of the information collected on corruption. This article aims to address this issue by introducing two survey experiments, one conducted in 2014 and one in 2018. The 2014 survey indicated that there is a substantive difference between the direct question and the experimental question. The level of tolerance for corruption is much higher than the other methodological instruments point out. Comparison with the 2018 experiment allowed the validation and extrapolation of the results found by Moisés and Nunes de Oliveira (2018).
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8674542
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8674542
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8674542/32475
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Opinião Pública
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Opinião Pública
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
Brasil; Contemporáneo
Brasil; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2023): May/Aug.; p. 270-303
Opinião Pública; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2023): mayo/ago.; p. 270-303
Opinião Pública; v. 29 n. 2 (2023): maio/ago.; p. 270-303
1807-0191
reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Opinião Pública (Online)
collection Opinião Pública (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br
_version_ 1800217018530529280