Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1999 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695 |
Resumo: | Plural sentences are commonly assumed to be semantically ambiguous, and to have a collective, a distributive or an intermediate reading. I criticize this view and argue that the distributive/collective/intermediate distinction is better seen not as a case of semantic ambiguity, characteristic of sentences or words as types. I suggest a minimalista view taking the colective/distributive/intermediate distinction to be truth-conditionally irrelevant, and merely qualifying utterances of true simpliciter plural sentences. The intuitions underlying the idea that plural sentences have diferente readings find an acho in our understanding of singular sentences like “Peter played a duet”. I explore this topic. My view of the readings of plural sentences can account for these intuitions. If I am right, number, connected to lexical items and sequences of lexical items in natural languages reveals how underinformative setences are, and underlines the role of interpretation in linguistic communication. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_3ce541d23b41788acf44b5e87756c350 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8666695 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Plural sentences and semantic ambiguitySemânticaSentenças pluraisPlural sentences are commonly assumed to be semantically ambiguous, and to have a collective, a distributive or an intermediate reading. I criticize this view and argue that the distributive/collective/intermediate distinction is better seen not as a case of semantic ambiguity, characteristic of sentences or words as types. I suggest a minimalista view taking the colective/distributive/intermediate distinction to be truth-conditionally irrelevant, and merely qualifying utterances of true simpliciter plural sentences. The intuitions underlying the idea that plural sentences have diferente readings find an acho in our understanding of singular sentences like “Peter played a duet”. I explore this topic. My view of the readings of plural sentences can account for these intuitions. If I am right, number, connected to lexical items and sequences of lexical items in natural languages reveals how underinformative setences are, and underlines the role of interpretation in linguistic communication.Universidade Estadual de Campinas1999-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 2 (1999): out.; 413-444Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 22 No. 2 (1999): Oct.; 413-444Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (1999): out.; 413-4442317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695/28513Canadá; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 1999 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVallée, Richard 2022-05-23T13:34:55Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8666695Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-05-23T13:34:55Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity |
title |
Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity |
spellingShingle |
Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity Vallée, Richard Semântica Sentenças plurais |
title_short |
Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity |
title_full |
Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity |
title_fullStr |
Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity |
title_sort |
Plural sentences and semantic ambiguity |
author |
Vallée, Richard |
author_facet |
Vallée, Richard |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vallée, Richard |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Semântica Sentenças plurais |
topic |
Semântica Sentenças plurais |
description |
Plural sentences are commonly assumed to be semantically ambiguous, and to have a collective, a distributive or an intermediate reading. I criticize this view and argue that the distributive/collective/intermediate distinction is better seen not as a case of semantic ambiguity, characteristic of sentences or words as types. I suggest a minimalista view taking the colective/distributive/intermediate distinction to be truth-conditionally irrelevant, and merely qualifying utterances of true simpliciter plural sentences. The intuitions underlying the idea that plural sentences have diferente readings find an acho in our understanding of singular sentences like “Peter played a duet”. I explore this topic. My view of the readings of plural sentences can account for these intuitions. If I am right, number, connected to lexical items and sequences of lexical items in natural languages reveals how underinformative setences are, and underlines the role of interpretation in linguistic communication. |
publishDate |
1999 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1999-10-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8666695/28513 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1999 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1999 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Canadá; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 2 (1999): out.; 413-444 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 22 No. 2 (1999): Oct.; 413-444 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 22 Núm. 2 (1999): out.; 413-444 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216568008802304 |