Citizens and collective deliberation in social science

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brasi, Leandro de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8664309
Resumo: It is argued that, in certain particular conditions related to the intellectual character of the deliberators and their cognitive diversity, small research teams that engage in deliberation in the analysis of data and involve citizens can better promote good epistemic results than those teams which do not involve citizens. In particular, it is argued that certain communities within the social sciences that lack the relevant cognitive diversity among their professionals can take advantage of the diversity found in the citizenry to increase the epistemic quality of their research, as long as the citizens possess the relevant virtues.
id UNICAMP-17_474e2e7d784c299bf203aca901362eb2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8664309
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Citizens and collective deliberation in social scienceCiudadanos y deliberación colectiva en las ciencias socialesCidadãos e deliberação coletiva nas ciências sociaisCiência cidadãoDivisão de trabalhoDeliberação coletivaVirtude intelectualDiversidade cognitivaIdeologiaCiencia ciudadanaDivisión del trabajoDeliberación colectivaVirtud intelectualDiversidad cognitivaIdeologíaCitizen scienceDivision of laborCollective deliberationIntellectual virtueCognitive diversityIdeologyIt is argued that, in certain particular conditions related to the intellectual character of the deliberators and their cognitive diversity, small research teams that engage in deliberation in the analysis of data and involve citizens can better promote good epistemic results than those teams which do not involve citizens. In particular, it is argued that certain communities within the social sciences that lack the relevant cognitive diversity among their professionals can take advantage of the diversity found in the citizenry to increase the epistemic quality of their research, as long as the citizens possess the relevant virtues.Se argumenta que, en determinadas condiciones particulares relacionadas con el carácter intelectual de los deliberantes y su diversidad cognitiva, pequeños equipos de investigación que deliberan en el análisis de datos e involucran a la ciudadanía pueden promover mejor buenos resultados epistémicos que aquellos equipos que no involucran los ciudadanos. En particular, se argumenta que determinadas comunidades dentro de las ciencias sociales que carecen de la diversidad cognitiva relevante entre sus profesionales pueden aprovechar la diversidad encontrada en la ciudadanía para incrementar la calidad epistémica de su investigación, siempre que los ciudadanos posean las virtudes relevantes .Argumenta-se que, em certas condições particulares relacionadas ao caráter intelectual dos deliberadores e sua diversidade cognitiva, pequenas equipes de pesquisa que se engajam na deliberação na análise de dados e envolvem cidadãos podem promover melhores resultados epistêmicos do que aquelas equipes que não envolvem cidadãos. Em particular, argumenta-se que certas comunidades dentro das ciências sociais que carecem da diversidade cognitiva relevante entre seus profissionais podem aproveitar a diversidade encontrada na cidadania para aumentar a qualidade epistêmica de suas pesquisas, desde que os cidadãos possuam as virtudes relevantes. .Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8664309Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 43 n. 3 (2020): jul./set.; 72-113Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 43 No. 3 (2020): jul./set.; 72-113Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 43 Núm. 3 (2020): jul./set.; 72-1132317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8664309/25954Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2020 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrasi, Leandro de2021-02-15T12:51:01Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8664309Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2021-02-15T12:51:01Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Citizens and collective deliberation in social science
Ciudadanos y deliberación colectiva en las ciencias sociales
Cidadãos e deliberação coletiva nas ciências sociais
title Citizens and collective deliberation in social science
spellingShingle Citizens and collective deliberation in social science
Brasi, Leandro de
Ciência cidadão
Divisão de trabalho
Deliberação coletiva
Virtude intelectual
Diversidade cognitiva
Ideologia
Ciencia ciudadana
División del trabajo
Deliberación colectiva
Virtud intelectual
Diversidad cognitiva
Ideología
Citizen science
Division of labor
Collective deliberation
Intellectual virtue
Cognitive diversity
Ideology
title_short Citizens and collective deliberation in social science
title_full Citizens and collective deliberation in social science
title_fullStr Citizens and collective deliberation in social science
title_full_unstemmed Citizens and collective deliberation in social science
title_sort Citizens and collective deliberation in social science
author Brasi, Leandro de
author_facet Brasi, Leandro de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brasi, Leandro de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ciência cidadão
Divisão de trabalho
Deliberação coletiva
Virtude intelectual
Diversidade cognitiva
Ideologia
Ciencia ciudadana
División del trabajo
Deliberación colectiva
Virtud intelectual
Diversidad cognitiva
Ideología
Citizen science
Division of labor
Collective deliberation
Intellectual virtue
Cognitive diversity
Ideology
topic Ciência cidadão
Divisão de trabalho
Deliberação coletiva
Virtude intelectual
Diversidade cognitiva
Ideologia
Ciencia ciudadana
División del trabajo
Deliberación colectiva
Virtud intelectual
Diversidad cognitiva
Ideología
Citizen science
Division of labor
Collective deliberation
Intellectual virtue
Cognitive diversity
Ideology
description It is argued that, in certain particular conditions related to the intellectual character of the deliberators and their cognitive diversity, small research teams that engage in deliberation in the analysis of data and involve citizens can better promote good epistemic results than those teams which do not involve citizens. In particular, it is argued that certain communities within the social sciences that lack the relevant cognitive diversity among their professionals can take advantage of the diversity found in the citizenry to increase the epistemic quality of their research, as long as the citizens possess the relevant virtues.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8664309
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8664309
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8664309/25954
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
Brasil; Contemporáneo
Brasil; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 43 n. 3 (2020): jul./set.; 72-113
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 43 No. 3 (2020): jul./set.; 72-113
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 43 Núm. 3 (2020): jul./set.; 72-113
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216567586226176

Registros relacionados