CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: DE BRASI,LEANDRO
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300072
Resumo: ABSTRACT It is argued that, in certain particular conditions related to the intellectual character of the deliberators and their cognitive diversity, small research teams that engage in deliberation in the analysis of data and involve citizens can better promote good epistemic results than those teams which do not involve citizens. In particular, it is argued that certain communities within the social sciences that lack the relevant cognitive diversity among their professionals can take advantage of the diversity found in the citizenry to increase the epistemic quality of their research, as long as the citizens possess the relevant virtues.
id UNICAMP-17_fa92b698551a6f40052cdb6acf87dc41
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-60452020000300072
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCECitizen ScienceDivision of LaborCollective DeliberationIntellectual VirtueCognitive DiversityIdeologyABSTRACT It is argued that, in certain particular conditions related to the intellectual character of the deliberators and their cognitive diversity, small research teams that engage in deliberation in the analysis of data and involve citizens can better promote good epistemic results than those teams which do not involve citizens. In particular, it is argued that certain communities within the social sciences that lack the relevant cognitive diversity among their professionals can take advantage of the diversity found in the citizenry to increase the epistemic quality of their research, as long as the citizens possess the relevant virtues.UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300072Manuscrito v.43 n.3 2020reponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMP10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n3.lbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDE BRASI,LEANDROeng2020-10-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-60452020000300072Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-6045&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpmwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2020-10-19T00:00Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
title CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
spellingShingle CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
DE BRASI,LEANDRO
Citizen Science
Division of Labor
Collective Deliberation
Intellectual Virtue
Cognitive Diversity
Ideology
title_short CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
title_full CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
title_fullStr CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
title_full_unstemmed CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
title_sort CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
author DE BRASI,LEANDRO
author_facet DE BRASI,LEANDRO
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv DE BRASI,LEANDRO
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Citizen Science
Division of Labor
Collective Deliberation
Intellectual Virtue
Cognitive Diversity
Ideology
topic Citizen Science
Division of Labor
Collective Deliberation
Intellectual Virtue
Cognitive Diversity
Ideology
description ABSTRACT It is argued that, in certain particular conditions related to the intellectual character of the deliberators and their cognitive diversity, small research teams that engage in deliberation in the analysis of data and involve citizens can better promote good epistemic results than those teams which do not involve citizens. In particular, it is argued that certain communities within the social sciences that lack the relevant cognitive diversity among their professionals can take advantage of the diversity found in the citizenry to increase the epistemic quality of their research, as long as the citizens possess the relevant virtues.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300072
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300072
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n3.lb
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito v.43 n.3 2020
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1748950065916936192

Registros relacionados