BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: ARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKER
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: ARROYO,RAONI WOHNRATH
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452021000200001
Resumo: Abstract We articulate a distinction between ontology, understood as involving existence questions, and metaphysics, understood as either providing for metaphysical profiles of entities or else as dealing with fundamentality and/or grounding and dependence questions. The distinction, we argue, allows a better understanding of the roles of metaontology and metametaphysics when it comes to discussing the relations between ontology and science on the one hand, and metaphysics and science on the other. We argue that while ontology, as understood in this paper, may have reasonable perspectives for naturalization, given its relation to science, the same cannot be said for metaphysics, given that it is typically understood as an additional theoretical layer over science, not participating in the scientific investigation. That may result either in skepticism over metaphysics, or else on accepting that metaphysics is an autonomous branch of investigation, depending on one’s concern for metaphysics.
id UNICAMP-17_9f35b91af9ec17084cfdc45b64db2a8e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-60452021000200001
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)OntologyMetaphysicsMetaontologyMetametaphysicsNaturalismAbstract We articulate a distinction between ontology, understood as involving existence questions, and metaphysics, understood as either providing for metaphysical profiles of entities or else as dealing with fundamentality and/or grounding and dependence questions. The distinction, we argue, allows a better understanding of the roles of metaontology and metametaphysics when it comes to discussing the relations between ontology and science on the one hand, and metaphysics and science on the other. We argue that while ontology, as understood in this paper, may have reasonable perspectives for naturalization, given its relation to science, the same cannot be said for metaphysics, given that it is typically understood as an additional theoretical layer over science, not participating in the scientific investigation. That may result either in skepticism over metaphysics, or else on accepting that metaphysics is an autonomous branch of investigation, depending on one’s concern for metaphysics.UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452021000200001Manuscrito v.44 n.2 2021reponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMP10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n2.jrinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKERARROYO,RAONI WOHNRATHeng2021-06-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-60452021000200001Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-6045&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpmwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2021-06-24T00:00Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)
title BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)
spellingShingle BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)
ARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKER
Ontology
Metaphysics
Metaontology
Metametaphysics
Naturalism
title_short BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)
title_full BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)
title_fullStr BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)
title_full_unstemmed BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)
title_sort BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)
author ARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKER
author_facet ARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKER
ARROYO,RAONI WOHNRATH
author_role author
author2 ARROYO,RAONI WOHNRATH
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv ARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKER
ARROYO,RAONI WOHNRATH
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ontology
Metaphysics
Metaontology
Metametaphysics
Naturalism
topic Ontology
Metaphysics
Metaontology
Metametaphysics
Naturalism
description Abstract We articulate a distinction between ontology, understood as involving existence questions, and metaphysics, understood as either providing for metaphysical profiles of entities or else as dealing with fundamentality and/or grounding and dependence questions. The distinction, we argue, allows a better understanding of the roles of metaontology and metametaphysics when it comes to discussing the relations between ontology and science on the one hand, and metaphysics and science on the other. We argue that while ontology, as understood in this paper, may have reasonable perspectives for naturalization, given its relation to science, the same cannot be said for metaphysics, given that it is typically understood as an additional theoretical layer over science, not participating in the scientific investigation. That may result either in skepticism over metaphysics, or else on accepting that metaphysics is an autonomous branch of investigation, depending on one’s concern for metaphysics.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452021000200001
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452021000200001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n2.jr
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito v.44 n.2 2021
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1748950066221023232