BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452021000200001 |
Resumo: | Abstract We articulate a distinction between ontology, understood as involving existence questions, and metaphysics, understood as either providing for metaphysical profiles of entities or else as dealing with fundamentality and/or grounding and dependence questions. The distinction, we argue, allows a better understanding of the roles of metaontology and metametaphysics when it comes to discussing the relations between ontology and science on the one hand, and metaphysics and science on the other. We argue that while ontology, as understood in this paper, may have reasonable perspectives for naturalization, given its relation to science, the same cannot be said for metaphysics, given that it is typically understood as an additional theoretical layer over science, not participating in the scientific investigation. That may result either in skepticism over metaphysics, or else on accepting that metaphysics is an autonomous branch of investigation, depending on one’s concern for metaphysics. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_9f35b91af9ec17084cfdc45b64db2a8e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-60452021000200001 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS)OntologyMetaphysicsMetaontologyMetametaphysicsNaturalismAbstract We articulate a distinction between ontology, understood as involving existence questions, and metaphysics, understood as either providing for metaphysical profiles of entities or else as dealing with fundamentality and/or grounding and dependence questions. The distinction, we argue, allows a better understanding of the roles of metaontology and metametaphysics when it comes to discussing the relations between ontology and science on the one hand, and metaphysics and science on the other. We argue that while ontology, as understood in this paper, may have reasonable perspectives for naturalization, given its relation to science, the same cannot be said for metaphysics, given that it is typically understood as an additional theoretical layer over science, not participating in the scientific investigation. That may result either in skepticism over metaphysics, or else on accepting that metaphysics is an autonomous branch of investigation, depending on one’s concern for metaphysics.UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452021000200001Manuscrito v.44 n.2 2021reponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMP10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n2.jrinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKERARROYO,RAONI WOHNRATHeng2021-06-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-60452021000200001Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-6045&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpmwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2021-06-24T00:00Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS) |
title |
BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS) |
spellingShingle |
BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS) ARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKER Ontology Metaphysics Metaontology Metametaphysics Naturalism |
title_short |
BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS) |
title_full |
BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS) |
title_fullStr |
BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS) |
title_full_unstemmed |
BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS) |
title_sort |
BACK TO THE QUESTION OF ONTOLOGY (AND METAPHYSICS) |
author |
ARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKER |
author_facet |
ARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKER ARROYO,RAONI WOHNRATH |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
ARROYO,RAONI WOHNRATH |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
ARENHART,JONAS RAFAEL BECKER ARROYO,RAONI WOHNRATH |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ontology Metaphysics Metaontology Metametaphysics Naturalism |
topic |
Ontology Metaphysics Metaontology Metametaphysics Naturalism |
description |
Abstract We articulate a distinction between ontology, understood as involving existence questions, and metaphysics, understood as either providing for metaphysical profiles of entities or else as dealing with fundamentality and/or grounding and dependence questions. The distinction, we argue, allows a better understanding of the roles of metaontology and metametaphysics when it comes to discussing the relations between ontology and science on the one hand, and metaphysics and science on the other. We argue that while ontology, as understood in this paper, may have reasonable perspectives for naturalization, given its relation to science, the same cannot be said for metaphysics, given that it is typically understood as an additional theoretical layer over science, not participating in the scientific investigation. That may result either in skepticism over metaphysics, or else on accepting that metaphysics is an autonomous branch of investigation, depending on one’s concern for metaphysics. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452021000200001 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452021000200001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-6045.2021.v44n2.jr |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito v.44 n.2 2021 reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1748950066221023232 |