An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Godoy, Evandro C.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652
Resumo: This paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy.
id UNICAMP-17_a546595992ee0fbb90a04f2627382342
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665652
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s KrvAn intensional view of judgment in Kant’s KrvAn intensional view of judgment in Kant’s KrvTranscendentalIdealismLogicSynthetic and analyticKantTrascendentalIdealismoLógicaSintético y analíticoKantTranscendentalIdealismoLógicaSintético e analíticoKantThis paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy.This paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy.This paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 44 n. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-148Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-148Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-1482317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652/26733Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2021 Evandro C. Godoyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGodoy, Evandro C. 2022-04-27T17:16:07Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665652Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-04-27T17:16:07Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
title An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
spellingShingle An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
Godoy, Evandro C.
Transcendental
Idealism
Logic
Synthetic and analytic
Kant
Trascendental
Idealismo
Lógica
Sintético y analítico
Kant
Transcendental
Idealismo
Lógica
Sintético e analítico
Kant
title_short An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
title_full An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
title_fullStr An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
title_full_unstemmed An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
title_sort An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
author Godoy, Evandro C.
author_facet Godoy, Evandro C.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Godoy, Evandro C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Transcendental
Idealism
Logic
Synthetic and analytic
Kant
Trascendental
Idealismo
Lógica
Sintético y analítico
Kant
Transcendental
Idealismo
Lógica
Sintético e analítico
Kant
topic Transcendental
Idealism
Logic
Synthetic and analytic
Kant
Trascendental
Idealismo
Lógica
Sintético y analítico
Kant
Transcendental
Idealismo
Lógica
Sintético e analítico
Kant
description This paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652/26733
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Evandro C. Godoy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Evandro C. Godoy
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
Brasil; Contemporáneo
Brasil; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 44 n. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-148
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-148
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-148
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216567650189312