An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652 |
Resumo: | This paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_a546595992ee0fbb90a04f2627382342 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665652 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s KrvAn intensional view of judgment in Kant’s KrvAn intensional view of judgment in Kant’s KrvTranscendentalIdealismLogicSynthetic and analyticKantTrascendentalIdealismoLógicaSintético y analíticoKantTranscendentalIdealismoLógicaSintético e analíticoKantThis paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy.This paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy.This paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 44 n. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-148Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-148Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-1482317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652/26733Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2021 Evandro C. Godoyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGodoy, Evandro C. 2022-04-27T17:16:07Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665652Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-04-27T17:16:07Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv |
title |
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv |
spellingShingle |
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv Godoy, Evandro C. Transcendental Idealism Logic Synthetic and analytic Kant Trascendental Idealismo Lógica Sintético y analítico Kant Transcendental Idealismo Lógica Sintético e analítico Kant |
title_short |
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv |
title_full |
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv |
title_fullStr |
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv |
title_full_unstemmed |
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv |
title_sort |
An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv |
author |
Godoy, Evandro C. |
author_facet |
Godoy, Evandro C. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Godoy, Evandro C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Transcendental Idealism Logic Synthetic and analytic Kant Trascendental Idealismo Lógica Sintético y analítico Kant Transcendental Idealismo Lógica Sintético e analítico Kant |
topic |
Transcendental Idealism Logic Synthetic and analytic Kant Trascendental Idealismo Lógica Sintético y analítico Kant Transcendental Idealismo Lógica Sintético e analítico Kant |
description |
This paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652/26733 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Evandro C. Godoy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Evandro C. Godoy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary Brasil; Contemporáneo Brasil; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 44 n. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-148 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-148 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2021): jan./mar.; 131-148 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216567650189312 |