Kant´s concept of the transcendental object
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644786 |
Resumo: | It is argued that there is a plausible way to read Kant as consistently repudiating a two-worlds picture and upholding a de-reistic view whereby the transcendental object or thing in itself indicates only a pure concept of the understanding whose role is to govern the synthesis of any unified manifold. This reading of Kant liberates him from the well-known textual and philosophical difficulties of the two-worlds view. Furthermore, I argue that this interpretation leads to a strong idealist position as opposed to the double-aspect view of Allison and Prauss. This idealist position was basically adopted by Fichte in his Introductions to the Science of Knowledge of 1797, wherein the debunking of the thing in itself was a crucial step in his ultimate argument for the unity of theoretical and practical reason. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_bf5c4e79c2acb491e3c01d4b69a07045 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644786 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Kant´s concept of the transcendental objectKanttranscendental idealismtranscendental objectthing in itselfAllisonnoumenatwo-worlds viewdouble-aspect viewFichtedogmatismIt is argued that there is a plausible way to read Kant as consistently repudiating a two-worlds picture and upholding a de-reistic view whereby the transcendental object or thing in itself indicates only a pure concept of the understanding whose role is to govern the synthesis of any unified manifold. This reading of Kant liberates him from the well-known textual and philosophical difficulties of the two-worlds view. Furthermore, I argue that this interpretation leads to a strong idealist position as opposed to the double-aspect view of Allison and Prauss. This idealist position was basically adopted by Fichte in his Introductions to the Science of Knowledge of 1797, wherein the debunking of the thing in itself was a crucial step in his ultimate argument for the unity of theoretical and practical reason.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-04-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644786Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 24 n. 1 (2001): abr.; 103-139Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2001): Apr.; 103-139Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2001): abr.; 103-1392317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644786/12050Copyright (c) 2001 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHickey, Lance2022-05-11T16:35:18Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644786Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-05-11T16:35:18Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Kant´s concept of the transcendental object |
title |
Kant´s concept of the transcendental object |
spellingShingle |
Kant´s concept of the transcendental object Hickey, Lance Kant transcendental idealism transcendental object thing in itself Allison noumena two-worlds view double-aspect view Fichte dogmatism |
title_short |
Kant´s concept of the transcendental object |
title_full |
Kant´s concept of the transcendental object |
title_fullStr |
Kant´s concept of the transcendental object |
title_full_unstemmed |
Kant´s concept of the transcendental object |
title_sort |
Kant´s concept of the transcendental object |
author |
Hickey, Lance |
author_facet |
Hickey, Lance |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hickey, Lance |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Kant transcendental idealism transcendental object thing in itself Allison noumena two-worlds view double-aspect view Fichte dogmatism |
topic |
Kant transcendental idealism transcendental object thing in itself Allison noumena two-worlds view double-aspect view Fichte dogmatism |
description |
It is argued that there is a plausible way to read Kant as consistently repudiating a two-worlds picture and upholding a de-reistic view whereby the transcendental object or thing in itself indicates only a pure concept of the understanding whose role is to govern the synthesis of any unified manifold. This reading of Kant liberates him from the well-known textual and philosophical difficulties of the two-worlds view. Furthermore, I argue that this interpretation leads to a strong idealist position as opposed to the double-aspect view of Allison and Prauss. This idealist position was basically adopted by Fichte in his Introductions to the Science of Knowledge of 1797, wherein the debunking of the thing in itself was a crucial step in his ultimate argument for the unity of theoretical and practical reason. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644786 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644786 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644786/12050 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2001 Manuscrito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2001 Manuscrito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 24 n. 1 (2001): abr.; 103-139 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2001): Apr.; 103-139 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2001): abr.; 103-139 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216566594273280 |