Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alessio,Cláudio Andrés
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000200005
Resumo: Resumen DeLP (Defeasible Logic Programming) is a defeasible argumentation system that captures common sense reasoning features. Examples proposed in the literature show that DeLP gets counterintuitive results. We suggest a possible cause of this problem and we propose an approach to neutralize it. The approach is based on the pre-selection criterion of arguments, called maximal specificity. The criterion establishes that an argument will be considered like maximally specific only if, for every argument based on more specific evidence which does not explain the same conclusion, it explains neither the contrary nor something more general.
id UNICAMP-17_d4dd2b63e920649394df5ea475a2f73a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-60452016000200005
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación RebatibleRazonamiento DefaultEspecificidadRestablecimientoDerrotaResumen DeLP (Defeasible Logic Programming) is a defeasible argumentation system that captures common sense reasoning features. Examples proposed in the literature show that DeLP gets counterintuitive results. We suggest a possible cause of this problem and we propose an approach to neutralize it. The approach is based on the pre-selection criterion of arguments, called maximal specificity. The criterion establishes that an argument will be considered like maximally specific only if, for every argument based on more specific evidence which does not explain the same conclusion, it explains neither the contrary nor something more general.UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000200005Manuscrito v.39 n.2 2016reponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMP10.1590/0100-6045.2016.V39N2.CAAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlessio,Cláudio Andrésspa2016-10-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-60452016000200005Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-6045&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpmwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2016-10-24T00:00Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible
title Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible
spellingShingle Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible
Alessio,Cláudio Andrés
Razonamiento Default
Especificidad
Restablecimiento
Derrota
title_short Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible
title_full Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible
title_fullStr Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible
title_full_unstemmed Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible
title_sort Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible
author Alessio,Cláudio Andrés
author_facet Alessio,Cláudio Andrés
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alessio,Cláudio Andrés
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Razonamiento Default
Especificidad
Restablecimiento
Derrota
topic Razonamiento Default
Especificidad
Restablecimiento
Derrota
description Resumen DeLP (Defeasible Logic Programming) is a defeasible argumentation system that captures common sense reasoning features. Examples proposed in the literature show that DeLP gets counterintuitive results. We suggest a possible cause of this problem and we propose an approach to neutralize it. The approach is based on the pre-selection criterion of arguments, called maximal specificity. The criterion establishes that an argument will be considered like maximally specific only if, for every argument based on more specific evidence which does not explain the same conclusion, it explains neither the contrary nor something more general.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000200005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452016000200005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0100-6045.2016.V39N2.CAA
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito v.39 n.2 2016
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1748950065352802304

Registros relacionados