CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300072 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT It is argued that, in certain particular conditions related to the intellectual character of the deliberators and their cognitive diversity, small research teams that engage in deliberation in the analysis of data and involve citizens can better promote good epistemic results than those teams which do not involve citizens. In particular, it is argued that certain communities within the social sciences that lack the relevant cognitive diversity among their professionals can take advantage of the diversity found in the citizenry to increase the epistemic quality of their research, as long as the citizens possess the relevant virtues. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_fa92b698551a6f40052cdb6acf87dc41 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-60452020000300072 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCECitizen ScienceDivision of LaborCollective DeliberationIntellectual VirtueCognitive DiversityIdeologyABSTRACT It is argued that, in certain particular conditions related to the intellectual character of the deliberators and their cognitive diversity, small research teams that engage in deliberation in the analysis of data and involve citizens can better promote good epistemic results than those teams which do not involve citizens. In particular, it is argued that certain communities within the social sciences that lack the relevant cognitive diversity among their professionals can take advantage of the diversity found in the citizenry to increase the epistemic quality of their research, as long as the citizens possess the relevant virtues.UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300072Manuscrito v.43 n.3 2020reponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMP10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n3.lbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDE BRASI,LEANDROeng2020-10-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-60452020000300072Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0100-6045&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpmwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2020-10-19T00:00Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE |
title |
CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE |
spellingShingle |
CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE DE BRASI,LEANDRO Citizen Science Division of Labor Collective Deliberation Intellectual Virtue Cognitive Diversity Ideology |
title_short |
CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE |
title_full |
CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE |
title_fullStr |
CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE |
title_full_unstemmed |
CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE |
title_sort |
CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE |
author |
DE BRASI,LEANDRO |
author_facet |
DE BRASI,LEANDRO |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
DE BRASI,LEANDRO |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Citizen Science Division of Labor Collective Deliberation Intellectual Virtue Cognitive Diversity Ideology |
topic |
Citizen Science Division of Labor Collective Deliberation Intellectual Virtue Cognitive Diversity Ideology |
description |
ABSTRACT It is argued that, in certain particular conditions related to the intellectual character of the deliberators and their cognitive diversity, small research teams that engage in deliberation in the analysis of data and involve citizens can better promote good epistemic results than those teams which do not involve citizens. In particular, it is argued that certain communities within the social sciences that lack the relevant cognitive diversity among their professionals can take advantage of the diversity found in the citizenry to increase the epistemic quality of their research, as long as the citizens possess the relevant virtues. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300072 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452020000300072 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n3.lb |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNICAMP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito v.43 n.3 2020 reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1748950065916936192 |