The ‘New Kant’ on the fundamental value of rational nature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Adeniyi Fasoro, Sunday
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Kant e-prints (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/1302
Resumo: This article examines the ‘New Kant’ claims that the fundamental value of rational nature rather than morally worthy action is the source of human dignity. The ‘New Kant’ argues that all persons have a dignity that must be respected unconditionally in virtue of the capacity to set ends or act for a reason, regardless of whether they disrespect humanity in their own person. It is believed that the ends of human beings cannot be given but are adopted because they have the power to legislate and to set unconditioned ends for themselves through the principle of willing. This article evaluates three popular theses of the ‘New Kant’: first, that dignity and respect-worthiness are independent of morality; second, that the moral duty to respect people is, on the one hand, the reason why we must respect others because dignity is a normative concept, and on the other hand, incompatible with the demand to always act on moral principles because dignity is possessed prior to morality; and third, that there is a moral command to always respect others, but not oneself.
id UNICAMP-27_1278e82cfbf39a506673a5304e9efd1e
oai_identifier_str oai:www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/:article/1302
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-27
network_name_str Kant e-prints (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The ‘New Kant’ on the fundamental value of rational naturerational naturevaluehumanitydignityrespectmoral worthautonomynature rationnellevaleurl'humanitédignitérespectvaleur moraleautonomieThis article examines the ‘New Kant’ claims that the fundamental value of rational nature rather than morally worthy action is the source of human dignity. The ‘New Kant’ argues that all persons have a dignity that must be respected unconditionally in virtue of the capacity to set ends or act for a reason, regardless of whether they disrespect humanity in their own person. It is believed that the ends of human beings cannot be given but are adopted because they have the power to legislate and to set unconditioned ends for themselves through the principle of willing. This article evaluates three popular theses of the ‘New Kant’: first, that dignity and respect-worthiness are independent of morality; second, that the moral duty to respect people is, on the one hand, the reason why we must respect others because dignity is a normative concept, and on the other hand, incompatible with the demand to always act on moral principles because dignity is possessed prior to morality; and third, that there is a moral command to always respect others, but not oneself.Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)2019-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/1302Kant e-prints; v. 13 n. 3 (2018); 74-96Kant e-Prints; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2018); 74-961677-163Xreponame:Kant e-prints (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:Unicampporhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/1302/1058Copyright (c) 2018 Kant e-Prints - Revista Internacional de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAdeniyi Fasoro, Sunday2021-10-17T22:33:39Zoai:www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/:article/1302Revistahttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/PUBhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/oaiclekant@unicamp.br||danielomarperez@hotmail.com||daniel.omar.perez@pq.cnpq.br1677-163X1677-163Xopendoar:2021-10-17T22:33:39Kant e-prints (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The ‘New Kant’ on the fundamental value of rational nature
title The ‘New Kant’ on the fundamental value of rational nature
spellingShingle The ‘New Kant’ on the fundamental value of rational nature
Adeniyi Fasoro, Sunday
rational nature
value
humanity
dignity
respect
moral worth
autonomy
nature rationnelle
valeur
l'humanité
dignité
respect
valeur morale
autonomie
title_short The ‘New Kant’ on the fundamental value of rational nature
title_full The ‘New Kant’ on the fundamental value of rational nature
title_fullStr The ‘New Kant’ on the fundamental value of rational nature
title_full_unstemmed The ‘New Kant’ on the fundamental value of rational nature
title_sort The ‘New Kant’ on the fundamental value of rational nature
author Adeniyi Fasoro, Sunday
author_facet Adeniyi Fasoro, Sunday
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Adeniyi Fasoro, Sunday
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv rational nature
value
humanity
dignity
respect
moral worth
autonomy
nature rationnelle
valeur
l'humanité
dignité
respect
valeur morale
autonomie
topic rational nature
value
humanity
dignity
respect
moral worth
autonomy
nature rationnelle
valeur
l'humanité
dignité
respect
valeur morale
autonomie
description This article examines the ‘New Kant’ claims that the fundamental value of rational nature rather than morally worthy action is the source of human dignity. The ‘New Kant’ argues that all persons have a dignity that must be respected unconditionally in virtue of the capacity to set ends or act for a reason, regardless of whether they disrespect humanity in their own person. It is believed that the ends of human beings cannot be given but are adopted because they have the power to legislate and to set unconditioned ends for themselves through the principle of willing. This article evaluates three popular theses of the ‘New Kant’: first, that dignity and respect-worthiness are independent of morality; second, that the moral duty to respect people is, on the one hand, the reason why we must respect others because dignity is a normative concept, and on the other hand, incompatible with the demand to always act on moral principles because dignity is possessed prior to morality; and third, that there is a moral command to always respect others, but not oneself.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/1302
url https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/1302
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/1302/1058
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Kant e-Prints - Revista Internacional de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Kant e-Prints - Revista Internacional de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Kant e-prints; v. 13 n. 3 (2018); 74-96
Kant e-Prints; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2018); 74-96
1677-163X
reponame:Kant e-prints (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:Unicamp
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str Unicamp
institution Unicamp
reponame_str Kant e-prints (Online)
collection Kant e-prints (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kant e-prints (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv clekant@unicamp.br||danielomarperez@hotmail.com||daniel.omar.perez@pq.cnpq.br
_version_ 1754842243618832384