What has transcendental deduction proven?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Kant e-prints (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/486 |
Resumo: | This short paper intends to point some evidences that Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the categories should be read as an argument whose goal is to demonstrate that a discursive intellect has to be able to know objects, since otherwise a representation would not be able to be ascribed to the “I”. |
id |
UNICAMP-27_6fef0dd8eb5ef26c97b3c9100682ca38 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/:article/486 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-27 |
network_name_str |
Kant e-prints (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
What has transcendental deduction proven?TranscendentalcriticKantThis short paper intends to point some evidences that Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the categories should be read as an argument whose goal is to demonstrate that a discursive intellect has to be able to know objects, since otherwise a representation would not be able to be ascribed to the “I”.Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/486Kant e-prints; v. 3 n. 2 (2008); 287-292Kant e-Prints; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2008); 287-2921677-163Xreponame:Kant e-prints (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:Unicampporhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/486/386Copyright (c) 2015 Kant e-Printsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLuisa Bucchile Faggion, Andréa2021-10-19T15:07:21Zoai:www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/:article/486Revistahttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/PUBhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/oaiclekant@unicamp.br||danielomarperez@hotmail.com||daniel.omar.perez@pq.cnpq.br1677-163X1677-163Xopendoar:2021-10-19T15:07:21Kant e-prints (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What has transcendental deduction proven? |
title |
What has transcendental deduction proven? |
spellingShingle |
What has transcendental deduction proven? Luisa Bucchile Faggion, Andréa Transcendental critic Kant |
title_short |
What has transcendental deduction proven? |
title_full |
What has transcendental deduction proven? |
title_fullStr |
What has transcendental deduction proven? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What has transcendental deduction proven? |
title_sort |
What has transcendental deduction proven? |
author |
Luisa Bucchile Faggion, Andréa |
author_facet |
Luisa Bucchile Faggion, Andréa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Luisa Bucchile Faggion, Andréa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Transcendental critic Kant |
topic |
Transcendental critic Kant |
description |
This short paper intends to point some evidences that Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the categories should be read as an argument whose goal is to demonstrate that a discursive intellect has to be able to know objects, since otherwise a representation would not be able to be ascribed to the “I”. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/486 |
url |
https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/486 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/486/386 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Kant e-Prints info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Kant e-Prints |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Kant e-prints; v. 3 n. 2 (2008); 287-292 Kant e-Prints; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2008); 287-292 1677-163X reponame:Kant e-prints (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:Unicamp |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
Unicamp |
institution |
Unicamp |
reponame_str |
Kant e-prints (Online) |
collection |
Kant e-prints (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Kant e-prints (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
clekant@unicamp.br||danielomarperez@hotmail.com||daniel.omar.perez@pq.cnpq.br |
_version_ |
1754842243315793920 |