Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kolude, Bamidele
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Opeyemi, Sigbeku, Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe, Aderemi, Adeosun
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039
Resumo: Introduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings.
id UNICAMP-8_267fcb7feb4b875b573fd21d2eac217d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8650039
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancersMulti detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancersMulti-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers.OrtodontiaMulti-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers.OrtodontiaIntroduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings.Introduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionMétodo experimentalMétodo experimentalapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865003910.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 15 n. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-279Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-2791677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039/16438Kolude, BamideleOpeyemi, SigbekuBamidele, Adeniji-SofoluweAderemi, Adeosuninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-03-09T16:13:53Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8650039Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2018-03-09T16:13:53Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
title Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
spellingShingle Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
Kolude, Bamidele
Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers.
Ortodontia
Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers.
Ortodontia
title_short Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
title_full Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
title_fullStr Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
title_full_unstemmed Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
title_sort Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
author Kolude, Bamidele
author_facet Kolude, Bamidele
Opeyemi, Sigbeku
Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe
Aderemi, Adeosun
author_role author
author2 Opeyemi, Sigbeku
Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe
Aderemi, Adeosun
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kolude, Bamidele
Opeyemi, Sigbeku
Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe
Aderemi, Adeosun
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers.
Ortodontia
Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers.
Ortodontia
topic Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers.
Ortodontia
Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers.
Ortodontia
description Introduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Método experimental
Método experimental
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039
10.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039/16438
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 15 n. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-279
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-279
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216401771757568