Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039 |
Resumo: | Introduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_267fcb7feb4b875b573fd21d2eac217d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8650039 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancersMulti detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancersMulti-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers.OrtodontiaMulti-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers.OrtodontiaIntroduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings.Introduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionMétodo experimentalMétodo experimentalapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865003910.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 15 n. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-279Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-2791677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039/16438Kolude, BamideleOpeyemi, SigbekuBamidele, Adeniji-SofoluweAderemi, Adeosuninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-03-09T16:13:53Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8650039Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2018-03-09T16:13:53Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
title |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
spellingShingle |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers Kolude, Bamidele Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers. Ortodontia Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers. Ortodontia |
title_short |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
title_full |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
title_fullStr |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
title_sort |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
author |
Kolude, Bamidele |
author_facet |
Kolude, Bamidele Opeyemi, Sigbeku Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe Aderemi, Adeosun |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Opeyemi, Sigbeku Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe Aderemi, Adeosun |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kolude, Bamidele Opeyemi, Sigbeku Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe Aderemi, Adeosun |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers. Ortodontia Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers. Ortodontia |
topic |
Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers. Ortodontia Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers. Ortodontia |
description |
Introduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Método experimental Método experimental |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039 10.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039/16438 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 15 n. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-279 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-279 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216401771757568 |