Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
DOI: | 10.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039 |
Resumo: | Introduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_267fcb7feb4b875b573fd21d2eac217d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8650039 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
spelling |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancersMulti detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancersMulti-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers.OrtodontiaMulti-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers.OrtodontiaIntroduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings.Introduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-09-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionMétodo experimentalMétodo experimentalapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865003910.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 15 n. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-279Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-2791677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039/16438Kolude, BamideleOpeyemi, SigbekuBamidele, Adeniji-SofoluweAderemi, Adeosuninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-03-09T16:13:53Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8650039Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2018-03-09T16:13:53Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
title |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
spellingShingle |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers Kolude, Bamidele Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers. Ortodontia Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers. Ortodontia Kolude, Bamidele Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers. Ortodontia Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers. Ortodontia |
title_short |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
title_full |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
title_fullStr |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
title_sort |
Multi detector computerized tomography scans aid in the staging of Head and Neck cancers |
author |
Kolude, Bamidele |
author_facet |
Kolude, Bamidele Kolude, Bamidele Opeyemi, Sigbeku Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe Aderemi, Adeosun Opeyemi, Sigbeku Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe Aderemi, Adeosun |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Opeyemi, Sigbeku Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe Aderemi, Adeosun |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kolude, Bamidele Opeyemi, Sigbeku Bamidele, Adeniji-Sofoluwe Aderemi, Adeosun |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers. Ortodontia Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers. Ortodontia |
topic |
Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and Neck Cancers. Ortodontia Multi-detector CT. Staging. Head and neck Cancers. Ortodontia |
description |
Introduction/Objectives: To assess the efficacy and correlation of MDCT scans in the clinical staging of patients with HNCs prior to therapeutic intervention. Methodology: Thirty-four HNCs were studied according to the 2005 WHO. Clinical AJCC 6th edition & radiological staging. Results: 14 Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC 41.2%) mean age 49.4 + 14.7 years, 13 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC 38.2%) mean age 37.1 + 20.5 years, 3 Odontogenic Carcinoma (ODC 8.8% made up of 2 cases ameloblastic carcinoma 5.9% and 1 case of ameloblastic carcinosarcoma 2.9%). Others cases were 3 Adenocarcinoma (8.8%) and 1 Sinonasal Carcinoma NC (2.9%). Mean age insignificant according to gender (p = 0.342). Sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and accuracy of clinical and radiological nodal involvements were: (47.4%; 80%; 61.8%; 75%; 54.5%) & (78.9%; 93.3%; 85.3%; 93.8%; 77.8%) respectively. Difference between clinical and radiological stages was statistically significant (X2= 260.8; p=0.01). There was a low but positive correlation between the clinical and radiologic stages (Pearson’s correlation r = 0.6). Conclusion: MDCT was significantly more accurate than clinical examination in the TNM of HNCs using AJCC/UICC TNM guidelines. Authors recommend MDCT as first line imaging technique in resource limited settings. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Método experimental Método experimental |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039 10.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8650039/16438 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 15 n. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-279 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2016): Oct./Dec.; 273-279 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1822179083164844032 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v15i4.8650039 |