Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641269 |
Resumo: | Aim: To compare the masticatory performance associated with different rehabilitation strategies for patients with edentulous mandibles. Methods: one portion of the test food “Optocal” was provided to groups: Natural Dentition (n = 15), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis (n = 8), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 14), Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 16), and Complete Dentures (n = 16). The portion was collected after 40 chewing strokes, and then passed through a stack of eight sieves with decreasing apertures. Masticatory performance was determined by weighing the portion of food on each sieve. Results: the masticatory performance was: 71.00% for Natural Dentition, 41.57% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis, 31.44% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis, 27.70% for Mandibular Implant-retained Overdenture, and 14.33% for Complete Dentures. The data were statistically compared using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups were statistically different from all other groups, with the Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups exhibiting the highest and lowest masticatory performance values, respectively. Conclusions: Osseointegrated implants improved the masticatory performance of all implant-supported groups compared to the Complete Dentures group. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_8aa4396c81d862ef48bd8bb85cd8b224 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641269 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandibleMasticationProstheses and implantsDental implantsDental prosthesis retentionOdontologiaAim: To compare the masticatory performance associated with different rehabilitation strategies for patients with edentulous mandibles. Methods: one portion of the test food “Optocal” was provided to groups: Natural Dentition (n = 15), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis (n = 8), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 14), Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 16), and Complete Dentures (n = 16). The portion was collected after 40 chewing strokes, and then passed through a stack of eight sieves with decreasing apertures. Masticatory performance was determined by weighing the portion of food on each sieve. Results: the masticatory performance was: 71.00% for Natural Dentition, 41.57% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis, 31.44% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis, 27.70% for Mandibular Implant-retained Overdenture, and 14.33% for Complete Dentures. The data were statistically compared using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups were statistically different from all other groups, with the Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups exhibiting the highest and lowest masticatory performance values, respectively. Conclusions: Osseointegrated implants improved the masticatory performance of all implant-supported groups compared to the Complete Dentures group.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-10-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641269Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 14 n. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 186-189Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 186-1891677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641269/8782Copyright (c) 2015 Flávio Domingues Neves, Tânia de Freitas Borges, Tânia de Freitas Borges, Daniela Baccelli Silveira Mendonça, Marisa Martins da Silva Prado, Karla Zancopéhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeves, Flávio DominguesBorges, Tânia de FreitasBorges, Tânia de FreitasMendonça, Daniela Baccelli SilveiraPrado, Marisa Martins da SilvaZancopé, Karla2023-10-02T14:44:48Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641269Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2023-10-02T14:44:48Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
title |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
spellingShingle |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible Neves, Flávio Domingues Mastication Prostheses and implants Dental implants Dental prosthesis retention Odontologia |
title_short |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
title_full |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
title_fullStr |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
title_full_unstemmed |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
title_sort |
Masticatory performance with different types of rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible |
author |
Neves, Flávio Domingues |
author_facet |
Neves, Flávio Domingues Borges, Tânia de Freitas Mendonça, Daniela Baccelli Silveira Prado, Marisa Martins da Silva Zancopé, Karla |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Borges, Tânia de Freitas Mendonça, Daniela Baccelli Silveira Prado, Marisa Martins da Silva Zancopé, Karla |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Neves, Flávio Domingues Borges, Tânia de Freitas Borges, Tânia de Freitas Mendonça, Daniela Baccelli Silveira Prado, Marisa Martins da Silva Zancopé, Karla |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mastication Prostheses and implants Dental implants Dental prosthesis retention Odontologia |
topic |
Mastication Prostheses and implants Dental implants Dental prosthesis retention Odontologia |
description |
Aim: To compare the masticatory performance associated with different rehabilitation strategies for patients with edentulous mandibles. Methods: one portion of the test food “Optocal” was provided to groups: Natural Dentition (n = 15), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis (n = 8), Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 14), Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdenture with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis (n = 16), and Complete Dentures (n = 16). The portion was collected after 40 chewing strokes, and then passed through a stack of eight sieves with decreasing apertures. Masticatory performance was determined by weighing the portion of food on each sieve. Results: the masticatory performance was: 71.00% for Natural Dentition, 41.57% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Fixed Prosthesis, 31.44% for Mandibular Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with Maxillary Removable Prosthesis, 27.70% for Mandibular Implant-retained Overdenture, and 14.33% for Complete Dentures. The data were statistically compared using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups were statistically different from all other groups, with the Natural Dentition and Complete Denture groups exhibiting the highest and lowest masticatory performance values, respectively. Conclusions: Osseointegrated implants improved the masticatory performance of all implant-supported groups compared to the Complete Dentures group. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641269 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641269 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641269/8782 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 14 n. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 186-189 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 186-189 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216398832599040 |