Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Soares, Ana Prates, Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima, Martins, Lidia Parsekian, Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881
Resumo: Aim: To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao®). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was no significant differences among SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao® mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN® presented also N and O in their composition. Conclusions: In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli®, SIN® and Conexao® presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN® mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implants
id UNICAMP-8_d46508b1587912dc2b624dd6e45273a1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8642881
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implantsOrthodontics. Orthodontic anchorage procedures. TitaniumOdontologiaAim: To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao®). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was no significant differences among SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao® mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN® presented also N and O in their composition. Conclusions: In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli®, SIN® and Conexao® presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN® mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implantsUniversidade Estadual de Campinas2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 14 n. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 251-255Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 251-2551677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881/10450Copyright (c) 2015 Luegya Amorim Henriques Knop, Ana Prates Soares, Ricardo Lima Shintcovsk, Lidia Parsekian Martins, Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKnop, Luegya Amorim HenriquesSoares, Ana PratesShintcovsk, Ricardo LimaMartins, Lidia ParsekianGandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga2023-10-02T15:20:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8642881Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2023-10-02T15:20:34Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
title Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
spellingShingle Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques
Orthodontics. Orthodontic anchorage procedures. Titanium
Odontologia
title_short Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
title_full Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
title_fullStr Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
title_sort Characterization of surface topography and chemical composition of mini-implants
author Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques
author_facet Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques
Soares, Ana Prates
Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima
Martins, Lidia Parsekian
Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga
author_role author
author2 Soares, Ana Prates
Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima
Martins, Lidia Parsekian
Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Knop, Luegya Amorim Henriques
Soares, Ana Prates
Shintcovsk, Ricardo Lima
Martins, Lidia Parsekian
Gandini Júnior, Luiz Gonzaga
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orthodontics. Orthodontic anchorage procedures. Titanium
Odontologia
topic Orthodontics. Orthodontic anchorage procedures. Titanium
Odontologia
description Aim: To assess the surface topography and chemical composition of three brands of as-received mini-implants (SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao®). Methods: Twelve mini-implants of each brand were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX). Results: There was no significant differences among SIN®, Morelli®, and Conexao® mini-implants comparing their surface topography by visualization of SEM micrographs and analysis of scores. The EDX analysis showed statistically significant difference among them for the amount of Ti, Al and V. Miniimplants SIN® presented also N and O in their composition. Conclusions: In conclusion, the miniimplants Morelli®, SIN® and Conexao® presented Ti as main component of the alloy. Remaining components, such as Al and V, were also observed in all the analyzed brands, with differences among them. Only SIN® mini-implants presented N and O. As far as surface topography is concerned, there are no differences among the three brands of mini-implants
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8642881/10450
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 14 n. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 251-255
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2015): Jul./Sep.; 251-255
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216401115348992