Formation of judicial precedents in Brazil and deficit of popular participation before the dispensability of holding public hearings

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Fabricio Veiga
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Martins, Danilo de Matos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11425
Resumo: The Code of Civil Procedure introduced into Brazilian law the institute of judicial precedent, as an alleged decision-making parameter of mandatory observance, edited by bodies of the Judiciary in the exercise of the jurisdictional function. The Code of Civil Procedure was not concerned with establishing a democratic system for the formation of judicial precedents. The methodology used was the carrying out of theoretical and bibliographical research, with consultation of national and international doctrines, scientific articles from indexed journals, dissertations, theses and court judgments. It was possible to conclude that the hypothesis analyzed obtained an affirmative result, that is, the system of formation of precedents in Brazil does not guarantee the democratic nature of the provisions that will be binding, since the participation of the interested parties affected by the decision, especially through the holding of a public hearing, not obligatory, it consists of a mere faculty of the judge.
id UNICESU-0_13e84e0853e0de5a85c654420aaac5a0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11425
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Formation of judicial precedents in Brazil and deficit of popular participation before the dispensability of holding public hearingsFormação dos precedentes judiciais no Brasil e déficit de participação popular ante a dispensabilidade da realização de audiências públicasPrecedentsPopular ParticipationPublic HearingsPrecedentesParticipação PopularAudiências PúblicasThe Code of Civil Procedure introduced into Brazilian law the institute of judicial precedent, as an alleged decision-making parameter of mandatory observance, edited by bodies of the Judiciary in the exercise of the jurisdictional function. The Code of Civil Procedure was not concerned with establishing a democratic system for the formation of judicial precedents. The methodology used was the carrying out of theoretical and bibliographical research, with consultation of national and international doctrines, scientific articles from indexed journals, dissertations, theses and court judgments. It was possible to conclude that the hypothesis analyzed obtained an affirmative result, that is, the system of formation of precedents in Brazil does not guarantee the democratic nature of the provisions that will be binding, since the participation of the interested parties affected by the decision, especially through the holding of a public hearing, not obligatory, it consists of a mere faculty of the judge.O Código de Processo Civil introduziu no direito brasileiro o instituto do precedente judicial, como pretenso parâmetro decisório de observância obrigatória, editado por órgãos do poder Judiciário no exercício da função jurisdicional. O Código de Processo Civil não se ocupou em estabelecer um sistema democrático de formação dos precedentes judiciais. A metodologia utilizada foi a realização de pesquisa teórico-bibliográfica, com consulta a doutrinas nacionais e internacionais, artigos científicos de revistas indexadas, dissertações, teses e julgados de tribunais. Foi possível concluir que a hipótese analisada obteve resultado afirmativo, ou seja, o sistema de formação dos precedentes no Brasil não garante a democraticidade dos provimentos que serão vinculantes, uma vez que a participação dos interessados afetados pela decisão, sobretudo via realização de audiência pública, não obrigatória, consiste em mera faculdade do julgador.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2023-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesTEXTOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1142510.17765/2176-9184.2023v23n2.e11425Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 23 n. 2 (2023): maio/ago.; 331-3482176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11425/7432Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Fabricio Veiga Martins, Danilo de Matos 2023-11-27T17:03:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11425Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2023-11-27T17:03:26Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Formation of judicial precedents in Brazil and deficit of popular participation before the dispensability of holding public hearings
Formação dos precedentes judiciais no Brasil e déficit de participação popular ante a dispensabilidade da realização de audiências públicas
title Formation of judicial precedents in Brazil and deficit of popular participation before the dispensability of holding public hearings
spellingShingle Formation of judicial precedents in Brazil and deficit of popular participation before the dispensability of holding public hearings
Costa, Fabricio Veiga
Precedents
Popular Participation
Public Hearings
Precedentes
Participação Popular
Audiências Públicas
title_short Formation of judicial precedents in Brazil and deficit of popular participation before the dispensability of holding public hearings
title_full Formation of judicial precedents in Brazil and deficit of popular participation before the dispensability of holding public hearings
title_fullStr Formation of judicial precedents in Brazil and deficit of popular participation before the dispensability of holding public hearings
title_full_unstemmed Formation of judicial precedents in Brazil and deficit of popular participation before the dispensability of holding public hearings
title_sort Formation of judicial precedents in Brazil and deficit of popular participation before the dispensability of holding public hearings
author Costa, Fabricio Veiga
author_facet Costa, Fabricio Veiga
Martins, Danilo de Matos
author_role author
author2 Martins, Danilo de Matos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Fabricio Veiga
Martins, Danilo de Matos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Precedents
Popular Participation
Public Hearings
Precedentes
Participação Popular
Audiências Públicas
topic Precedents
Popular Participation
Public Hearings
Precedentes
Participação Popular
Audiências Públicas
description The Code of Civil Procedure introduced into Brazilian law the institute of judicial precedent, as an alleged decision-making parameter of mandatory observance, edited by bodies of the Judiciary in the exercise of the jurisdictional function. The Code of Civil Procedure was not concerned with establishing a democratic system for the formation of judicial precedents. The methodology used was the carrying out of theoretical and bibliographical research, with consultation of national and international doctrines, scientific articles from indexed journals, dissertations, theses and court judgments. It was possible to conclude that the hypothesis analyzed obtained an affirmative result, that is, the system of formation of precedents in Brazil does not guarantee the democratic nature of the provisions that will be binding, since the participation of the interested parties affected by the decision, especially through the holding of a public hearing, not obligatory, it consists of a mere faculty of the judge.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
TEXTO
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11425
10.17765/2176-9184.2023v23n2.e11425
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11425
identifier_str_mv 10.17765/2176-9184.2023v23n2.e11425
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11425/7432
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 23 n. 2 (2023): maio/ago.; 331-348
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042384854941696

Registros relacionados