Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1577 |
Resumo: | Cells therapies and regenerative medicine, together with other emergent technologies coming from biotechnology and nanotechnology fi eld, constitute one of research lines promoted in Argentine in these years. Nevertheless, this priority hasn’t been supported by a previous defi nition of a regulatory program. Even without this program, diff erent social actors (private bio-banks, families, researchers, judges, philosophers), including State, advanced in the developing of practices with steam cells (therapeutic, commercial, experimental practices) and in the formulation of recommendations, opinions, norms. Th e regime for the government of umbilical cordon’s steam cells is in process of construction, subject to an “inventiveness” characterized by the juxtaposition of diff erent interests, rationalities, vocabularies. Th e hypothesis that we support is that bioethics, principles and norms that fi nally conduct practices with steam cells, don’t come from moral philosophers and jurist’s deliberations, but it is inventing in eff ective uses and those imagined by families, researchers, investors, and so on. Th is inventiveness is not developed in a pacifi c but in a controversial way. Starting with the analysis of a corpus of discourses produced by fi ve diff erent statement positions-families, private bio-banks, argentine researchers, state authorities and judges- in this article characterize the confl ict between refl ections, vocabularies, interests, technologies and bio- -ethics, that are at centre of debate related to therapeutic uses of steam cells from umbilical cord. |
id |
UNICEUB-3_a4e1197d322b9e0e09dbbc2d7608aa46 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/1577 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICEUB-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina Neoliberalismo, biopoder y comunidad: los conflictos en torno al régimen de gobierno de células madre de cordón umbilical en Argentina Cells therapies and regenerative medicine, together with other emergent technologies coming from biotechnology and nanotechnology fi eld, constitute one of research lines promoted in Argentine in these years. Nevertheless, this priority hasn’t been supported by a previous defi nition of a regulatory program. Even without this program, diff erent social actors (private bio-banks, families, researchers, judges, philosophers), including State, advanced in the developing of practices with steam cells (therapeutic, commercial, experimental practices) and in the formulation of recommendations, opinions, norms. Th e regime for the government of umbilical cordon’s steam cells is in process of construction, subject to an “inventiveness” characterized by the juxtaposition of diff erent interests, rationalities, vocabularies. Th e hypothesis that we support is that bioethics, principles and norms that fi nally conduct practices with steam cells, don’t come from moral philosophers and jurist’s deliberations, but it is inventing in eff ective uses and those imagined by families, researchers, investors, and so on. Th is inventiveness is not developed in a pacifi c but in a controversial way. Starting with the analysis of a corpus of discourses produced by fi ve diff erent statement positions-families, private bio-banks, argentine researchers, state authorities and judges- in this article characterize the confl ict between refl ections, vocabularies, interests, technologies and bio- -ethics, that are at centre of debate related to therapeutic uses of steam cells from umbilical cord.Junto con otras tecnologías emergentes en el campo de la biotecnología y la nanotecnología, las terapias celulares y la medicina regenerativa, constituyen una de las líneas de investigación promovidas en la Argentina en los últimos años. Esa prioridad no ha sido acompañada, no obstante, por la previa definición de un programa regulatorio. Aun en ausencia de dicho programa, diferentes actores sociales (bancos privados, familias, investigadores, jueces, filósofos) incluyendo al propio Estado, avanzaron tanto en el desarrollo de prácticas con células madres (terapéuticas, experimentales, comerciales) como en la formulación de recomendaciones, opiniones y normas. El régimen para el gobierno de las prácticas con células madre de cordón se encuentra en construcción, sujeto a una “inventiva” caracteriza por la yuxtaposición diferentes intereses, racionalidades, vocabularios, etcétera. La hipótesis que sostenemos es que la bioética, los principios y normas que, en definitiva, conduzcan las prácticas con células madre, no provienen de las deliberaciones de filósofos morales y juristas, sino que se están inventando en los usos efectivos y en aquellos imaginados por las familias, los investigadores, los inversores, etcétera. Pero esa inventiva no se desarrolla de manera pacífica sino conflictiva. A partir del análisis de un corpus de discursos producidos desde cinco posiciones de enunciación divergentes -las familias, los bio-bancos privados, los científicos argentinos, las autoridades estatales y los jueces-, en este artículo nos concentramos en la caracterizar el conflicto entre las múltiples reflexiones, vocabularios, intereses, tecnologías y bio-éticas, que se encuentran en el centro del debate respecto de los usos terapéuticos de las células madres de cordón umbilical.UniCEUBHaidar, Victoria2012-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/157710.5102/rbpp.v2i1.1577Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-141Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-141Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-1412236-16772179-8338reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBporhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1577/1542info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-19T21:24:55Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/1577Revistahttp://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/index.php/RBPPPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/oaiatendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com2236-16772179-8338opendoar:2018-12-19T21:24:55Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina Neoliberalismo, biopoder y comunidad: los conflictos en torno al régimen de gobierno de células madre de cordón umbilical en Argentina |
title |
Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina |
spellingShingle |
Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina Haidar, Victoria |
title_short |
Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina |
title_full |
Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina |
title_fullStr |
Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina |
title_sort |
Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina |
author |
Haidar, Victoria |
author_facet |
Haidar, Victoria |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Haidar, Victoria |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
description |
Cells therapies and regenerative medicine, together with other emergent technologies coming from biotechnology and nanotechnology fi eld, constitute one of research lines promoted in Argentine in these years. Nevertheless, this priority hasn’t been supported by a previous defi nition of a regulatory program. Even without this program, diff erent social actors (private bio-banks, families, researchers, judges, philosophers), including State, advanced in the developing of practices with steam cells (therapeutic, commercial, experimental practices) and in the formulation of recommendations, opinions, norms. Th e regime for the government of umbilical cordon’s steam cells is in process of construction, subject to an “inventiveness” characterized by the juxtaposition of diff erent interests, rationalities, vocabularies. Th e hypothesis that we support is that bioethics, principles and norms that fi nally conduct practices with steam cells, don’t come from moral philosophers and jurist’s deliberations, but it is inventing in eff ective uses and those imagined by families, researchers, investors, and so on. Th is inventiveness is not developed in a pacifi c but in a controversial way. Starting with the analysis of a corpus of discourses produced by fi ve diff erent statement positions-families, private bio-banks, argentine researchers, state authorities and judges- in this article characterize the confl ict between refl ections, vocabularies, interests, technologies and bio- -ethics, that are at centre of debate related to therapeutic uses of steam cells from umbilical cord. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-05-25 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1577 10.5102/rbpp.v2i1.1577 |
url |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1577 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5102/rbpp.v2i1.1577 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1577/1542 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UniCEUB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UniCEUB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-141 Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-141 Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-141 2236-1677 2179-8338 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) instacron:UNICEUB |
instname_str |
Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
instacron_str |
UNICEUB |
institution |
UNICEUB |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798328492266356736 |