Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Haidar, Victoria
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1577
Resumo: Cells therapies and regenerative medicine, together with other emergent technologies coming from biotechnology and nanotechnology fi eld, constitute one of research lines promoted in Argentine in these years. Nevertheless, this priority hasn’t been supported by a previous defi nition of a regulatory program. Even without this program, diff erent social actors (private bio-banks, families, researchers, judges, philosophers), including State, advanced in the developing of practices with steam cells (therapeutic, commercial, experimental practices) and in the formulation of recommendations, opinions, norms. Th e regime for the government of umbilical cordon’s steam cells is in process of construction, subject to an “inventiveness” characterized by the juxtaposition of diff erent interests, rationalities, vocabularies. Th e hypothesis that we support is that bioethics, principles and norms that fi nally conduct practices with steam cells, don’t come from moral philosophers and jurist’s deliberations, but it is inventing in eff ective uses and those imagined by families, researchers, investors, and so on. Th is inventiveness is not developed in a pacifi c but in a controversial way. Starting with the analysis of a corpus of discourses produced by fi ve diff erent statement positions-families, private bio-banks, argentine researchers, state authorities and judges- in this article characterize the confl ict between refl ections, vocabularies, interests, technologies and bio- -ethics, that are at centre of debate related to therapeutic uses of steam cells from umbilical cord.
id UNICEUB-3_a4e1197d322b9e0e09dbbc2d7608aa46
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/1577
network_acronym_str UNICEUB-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina Neoliberalismo, biopoder y comunidad: los conflictos en torno al régimen de gobierno de células madre de cordón umbilical en Argentina Cells therapies and regenerative medicine, together with other emergent technologies coming from biotechnology and nanotechnology fi eld, constitute one of research lines promoted in Argentine in these years. Nevertheless, this priority hasn’t been supported by a previous defi nition of a regulatory program. Even without this program, diff erent social actors (private bio-banks, families, researchers, judges, philosophers), including State, advanced in the developing of practices with steam cells (therapeutic, commercial, experimental practices) and in the formulation of recommendations, opinions, norms. Th e regime for the government of umbilical cordon’s steam cells is in process of construction, subject to an “inventiveness” characterized by the juxtaposition of diff erent interests, rationalities, vocabularies. Th e hypothesis that we support is that bioethics, principles and norms that fi nally conduct practices with steam cells, don’t come from moral philosophers and jurist’s deliberations, but it is inventing in eff ective uses and those imagined by families, researchers, investors, and so on. Th is inventiveness is not developed in a pacifi c but in a controversial way. Starting with the analysis of a corpus of discourses produced by fi ve diff erent statement positions-families, private bio-banks, argentine researchers, state authorities and judges- in this article characterize the confl ict between refl ections, vocabularies, interests, technologies and bio- -ethics, that are at centre of debate related to therapeutic uses of steam cells from umbilical cord.Junto con otras tecnologías emergentes en el campo de la biotecnología y la nanotecnología, las terapias celulares y la medicina regenerativa, constituyen una de las líneas de investigación promovidas en la Argentina en los últimos años. Esa prioridad no ha sido acompañada, no obstante, por la previa definición de un programa regulatorio. Aun en ausencia de dicho programa, diferentes actores sociales (bancos privados, familias, investigadores, jueces, filósofos) incluyendo al propio Estado, avanzaron tanto en el desarrollo de prácticas con células madres (terapéuticas, experimentales, comerciales) como en la formulación de recomendaciones, opiniones y normas. El régimen para el gobierno de las prácticas con células madre de cordón se encuentra en construcción, sujeto a una “inventiva” caracteriza por la yuxtaposición diferentes intereses, racionalidades, vocabularios, etcétera. La hipótesis que sostenemos es que la bioética, los principios y normas que, en definitiva, conduzcan las prácticas con células madre, no provienen de las deliberaciones de filósofos morales y juristas, sino que se están inventando en los usos efectivos y en aquellos imaginados por las familias, los investigadores, los inversores, etcétera. Pero esa inventiva no se desarrolla de manera pacífica sino conflictiva. A partir del análisis de un corpus de discursos producidos desde cinco posiciones de enunciación divergentes -las familias, los bio-bancos privados, los científicos argentinos, las autoridades estatales y los jueces-, en este artículo nos concentramos en la caracterizar el conflicto entre las múltiples reflexiones, vocabularios, intereses, tecnologías y bio-éticas, que se encuentran en el centro del debate respecto de los usos terapéuticos de las células madres de cordón umbilical.UniCEUBHaidar, Victoria2012-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/157710.5102/rbpp.v2i1.1577Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-141Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-141Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-1412236-16772179-8338reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)instacron:UNICEUBporhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1577/1542info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-12-19T21:24:55Zoai:oai.uniceub.emnuvens.com.br:article/1577Revistahttp://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/index.php/RBPPPRIhttps://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/oaiatendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com2236-16772179-8338opendoar:2018-12-19T21:24:55Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina
Neoliberalismo, biopoder y comunidad: los conflictos en torno al régimen de gobierno de células madre de cordón umbilical en Argentina
title Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina
spellingShingle Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina
Haidar, Victoria
title_short Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina
title_full Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina
title_fullStr Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina
title_sort Neoliberalism, biopolitics and community: The confl ict over governance of umbilical cord stem cells in Argentina
author Haidar, Victoria
author_facet Haidar, Victoria
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Haidar, Victoria
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv



description Cells therapies and regenerative medicine, together with other emergent technologies coming from biotechnology and nanotechnology fi eld, constitute one of research lines promoted in Argentine in these years. Nevertheless, this priority hasn’t been supported by a previous defi nition of a regulatory program. Even without this program, diff erent social actors (private bio-banks, families, researchers, judges, philosophers), including State, advanced in the developing of practices with steam cells (therapeutic, commercial, experimental practices) and in the formulation of recommendations, opinions, norms. Th e regime for the government of umbilical cordon’s steam cells is in process of construction, subject to an “inventiveness” characterized by the juxtaposition of diff erent interests, rationalities, vocabularies. Th e hypothesis that we support is that bioethics, principles and norms that fi nally conduct practices with steam cells, don’t come from moral philosophers and jurist’s deliberations, but it is inventing in eff ective uses and those imagined by families, researchers, investors, and so on. Th is inventiveness is not developed in a pacifi c but in a controversial way. Starting with the analysis of a corpus of discourses produced by fi ve diff erent statement positions-families, private bio-banks, argentine researchers, state authorities and judges- in this article characterize the confl ict between refl ections, vocabularies, interests, technologies and bio- -ethics, that are at centre of debate related to therapeutic uses of steam cells from umbilical cord.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-05-25
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1577
10.5102/rbpp.v2i1.1577
url https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1577
identifier_str_mv 10.5102/rbpp.v2i1.1577
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/1577/1542
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UniCEUB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UniCEUB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Public Policy; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-141
Revista Brasileña de Políticas Públicas; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-141
Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas; v. 2, n. 1 (2012); 125-141
2236-1677
2179-8338
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
instname:Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
instacron:UNICEUB
instname_str Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
instacron_str UNICEUB
institution UNICEUB
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas (Online) - Centro de Ensino de Brasília (UNICEUB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.seer@uniceub.br||rbppuniceub@gmail.com|| prisqua@gmail.com|| marcelodvarella@gmail.com
_version_ 1798328492266356736