Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
DOI: | 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7338 |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7338 |
Resumo: | Objective: The aim of the study was analyze nurses and nursing undergraduate students evaluation of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Nursing Evaluation. Method: Exploratory research with a quantitative approach. The MOOC ‘Nursing Assessment’ addressed the topic of introduction to the Nursing process. The study population consisted of MOOC participants who took the course in the first edition from October 2016 to January 2017. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final sample was composed of 118 participants. Data collection consisted of characterization data, presence perception through the Community of Inquiry Survey and two open questions. Results: The MOOC modality was not known by 62 (53%) of the participants and 69 (58.5%) had not previously taken this type of course. The course met the expectations of 94.9% of the participants. When comparing the average scores of the three dimensions of presence perception, there was a significant difference (p <0.001), with the presence of teaching being the dimension best evaluated. The lowest scores were concentrated on social presence. Conclusion: The teaching presence had the highest average score among the three presences evaluated, reflecting the quality of planning and the development of attractive and quality digital materials. |
id |
UNIFEI_0a112d3d16b3a07015ce81321b815ee5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7338 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
spelling |
Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)Evaluación de estudiantes de Enfermería y enfermeras de un curso en línea, abierto y masivo (MOOC)Avaliação de estudantes de Enfermagem e enfermeiros de um curso online, aberto e massivo (MOOC)Education distanceEducation nursingEducational technology.Educación a distanciaEducación en enfermeríaTecnología educacional.Educação a distânciaEducação em enfermagemTecnologias educacionais. Objective: The aim of the study was analyze nurses and nursing undergraduate students evaluation of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Nursing Evaluation. Method: Exploratory research with a quantitative approach. The MOOC ‘Nursing Assessment’ addressed the topic of introduction to the Nursing process. The study population consisted of MOOC participants who took the course in the first edition from October 2016 to January 2017. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final sample was composed of 118 participants. Data collection consisted of characterization data, presence perception through the Community of Inquiry Survey and two open questions. Results: The MOOC modality was not known by 62 (53%) of the participants and 69 (58.5%) had not previously taken this type of course. The course met the expectations of 94.9% of the participants. When comparing the average scores of the three dimensions of presence perception, there was a significant difference (p <0.001), with the presence of teaching being the dimension best evaluated. The lowest scores were concentrated on social presence. Conclusion: The teaching presence had the highest average score among the three presences evaluated, reflecting the quality of planning and the development of attractive and quality digital materials.Objetivo: El objetivo del estudio fue analizar la evaluación realizada por estudiantes de licenciatura en enfermería y enfermeras en el curso online, abierto y masivo (MOOC) "Evaluación de Enfermería".Métodos: Investigación exploratoria con enfoque cuantitativo. La "Evaluación de enfermería" del MOOC abordó el tema de la introducción al proceso de enfermería. La población de estudio consistió en participantes MOOC que tomaron el curso en la primera edición de octubre de 2016 a enero de 2017. Después de aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, la muestra final estuvo compuesta por 118 participantes. La recolección de datos consistió en datos de caracterización, percepción de presencia a través de la Encuesta de la Comunidad de Encuesta y dos preguntas abiertas. Resultados: 62 (53%) de los participantes desconocían la modalidad MOOC y 69 (58,5%) no habían tomado previamente este tipo de curso. El curso cumplió con las expectativas del 94,9% de los participantes. Cuando se compararon las puntuaciones medias de las tres dimensiones de la percepción de presencia, hubo una diferencia significativa (p <0.001), siendo la presencia de la enseñanza la dimensión mejor evaluada. Los puntajes más bajos se concentraron en la presencia social. Conclusión: La presencia de la enseñanza tuvo el puntaje promedio más alto entre las tres presencias evaluadas, lo que refleja la calidad de la planificación y el desarrollo de materiales digitales atractivos y de calidad.Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi analisar a avaliação realizada por estudantes de graduação em Enfermagem e de enfermeiros sobre o curso online, aberto e massivo (MOOC) ‘Avaliação de Enfermagem’. Métodos: Pesquisa do tipo exploratória com abordagem quantitativa. O MOOC ‘Avaliação de Enfermagem’ abordou a temática de introdução ao processo de Enfermagem. A população do estudo foi constituída pelos participantes do MOOC que realizaram o curso na primeira edição de outubro de 2016 a janeiro de 2017. Aplicados os critérios de inclusão e exclusão a amostra final foi composta por 118 participantes. A coleta de dados foi composta por dados de caracterização, a percepção de presença por meio do Community of Inquiry Survey e duas questões abertas. Resultados: A modalidade MOOC não era conhecida por 62 (53%) dos participantes e 69 (58,5%) não realizaram esse tipo de curso previamente. O curso atendeu as expectativas de 94,9% dos participantes. Quando comparados os escores médios das três dimensões de percepção de presença, houve diferença significativa (p<0,001), sendo a presença de ensino a dimensão melhor avaliada. As pontuações mais baixas se concentraram na presença social. Conclusão: A presença de ensino apresentou a pontuação média mais alta dentre as três presenças avaliadas, refletindo a qualidade do planejamento e o desenvolvimento de materiais digitais atrativos e de qualidade.Research, Society and Development2020-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/733810.33448/rsd-v9i9.7338Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e351997338Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e351997338Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e3519973382525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7338/6509Copyright (c) 2020 Cibele Duarte Parulla; Ana Luísa Petersen Cogo; Daiane Dal Paihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessParulla, Cibele DuarteCogo, Ana Luísa PetersenPai, Daiane Dal 2020-09-18T01:42:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7338Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:30:05.966632Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) Evaluación de estudiantes de Enfermería y enfermeras de un curso en línea, abierto y masivo (MOOC) Avaliação de estudantes de Enfermagem e enfermeiros de um curso online, aberto e massivo (MOOC) |
title |
Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) Parulla, Cibele Duarte Education distance Education nursing Educational technology. Educación a distancia Educación en enfermería Tecnología educacional. Educação a distância Educação em enfermagem Tecnologias educacionais. Parulla, Cibele Duarte Education distance Education nursing Educational technology. Educación a distancia Educación en enfermería Tecnología educacional. Educação a distância Educação em enfermagem Tecnologias educacionais. |
title_short |
Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) |
title_full |
Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) |
title_sort |
Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC) |
author |
Parulla, Cibele Duarte |
author_facet |
Parulla, Cibele Duarte Parulla, Cibele Duarte Cogo, Ana Luísa Petersen Pai, Daiane Dal Cogo, Ana Luísa Petersen Pai, Daiane Dal |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cogo, Ana Luísa Petersen Pai, Daiane Dal |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Parulla, Cibele Duarte Cogo, Ana Luísa Petersen Pai, Daiane Dal |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Education distance Education nursing Educational technology. Educación a distancia Educación en enfermería Tecnología educacional. Educação a distância Educação em enfermagem Tecnologias educacionais. |
topic |
Education distance Education nursing Educational technology. Educación a distancia Educación en enfermería Tecnología educacional. Educação a distância Educação em enfermagem Tecnologias educacionais. |
description |
Objective: The aim of the study was analyze nurses and nursing undergraduate students evaluation of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Nursing Evaluation. Method: Exploratory research with a quantitative approach. The MOOC ‘Nursing Assessment’ addressed the topic of introduction to the Nursing process. The study population consisted of MOOC participants who took the course in the first edition from October 2016 to January 2017. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final sample was composed of 118 participants. Data collection consisted of characterization data, presence perception through the Community of Inquiry Survey and two open questions. Results: The MOOC modality was not known by 62 (53%) of the participants and 69 (58.5%) had not previously taken this type of course. The course met the expectations of 94.9% of the participants. When comparing the average scores of the three dimensions of presence perception, there was a significant difference (p <0.001), with the presence of teaching being the dimension best evaluated. The lowest scores were concentrated on social presence. Conclusion: The teaching presence had the highest average score among the three presences evaluated, reflecting the quality of planning and the development of attractive and quality digital materials. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7338 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7338 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7338 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7338 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7338/6509 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Cibele Duarte Parulla; Ana Luísa Petersen Cogo; Daiane Dal Pai http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Cibele Duarte Parulla; Ana Luísa Petersen Cogo; Daiane Dal Pai http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e351997338 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e351997338 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e351997338 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822178604343099392 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7338 |