Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Parulla, Cibele Duarte
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Cogo, Ana Luísa Petersen, Pai, Daiane Dal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7338
Resumo: Objective: The aim of the study was analyze nurses and nursing undergraduate students evaluation of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Nursing Evaluation. Method: Exploratory research with a quantitative approach. The MOOC ‘Nursing Assessment’ addressed the topic of introduction to the Nursing process. The study population consisted of MOOC participants who took the course in the first edition from October 2016 to January 2017. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final sample was composed of 118 participants. Data collection consisted of characterization data, presence perception through the Community of Inquiry Survey and two open questions. Results: The MOOC modality was not known by 62 (53%) of the participants and 69 (58.5%) had not previously taken this type of course. The course met the expectations of 94.9% of the participants. When comparing the average scores of the three dimensions of presence perception, there was a significant difference (p <0.001), with the presence of teaching being the dimension best evaluated. The lowest scores were concentrated on social presence. Conclusion: The teaching presence had the highest average score among the three presences evaluated, reflecting the quality of planning and the development of attractive and quality digital materials.
id UNIFEI_0a112d3d16b3a07015ce81321b815ee5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7338
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)Evaluación de estudiantes de Enfermería y enfermeras de un curso en línea, abierto y masivo (MOOC)Avaliação de estudantes de Enfermagem e enfermeiros de um curso online, aberto e massivo (MOOC)Education distanceEducation nursingEducational technology.Educación a distanciaEducación en enfermeríaTecnología educacional.Educação a distânciaEducação em enfermagemTecnologias educacionais. Objective: The aim of the study was analyze nurses and nursing undergraduate students evaluation of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Nursing Evaluation. Method: Exploratory research with a quantitative approach. The MOOC ‘Nursing Assessment’ addressed the topic of introduction to the Nursing process. The study population consisted of MOOC participants who took the course in the first edition from October 2016 to January 2017. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final sample was composed of 118 participants. Data collection consisted of characterization data, presence perception through the Community of Inquiry Survey and two open questions. Results: The MOOC modality was not known by 62 (53%) of the participants and 69 (58.5%) had not previously taken this type of course. The course met the expectations of 94.9% of the participants. When comparing the average scores of the three dimensions of presence perception, there was a significant difference (p <0.001), with the presence of teaching being the dimension best evaluated. The lowest scores were concentrated on social presence. Conclusion: The teaching presence had the highest average score among the three presences evaluated, reflecting the quality of planning and the development of attractive and quality digital materials.Objetivo: El objetivo del estudio fue analizar la evaluación realizada por estudiantes de licenciatura en enfermería y enfermeras en el curso online, abierto y masivo (MOOC) "Evaluación de Enfermería".Métodos: Investigación exploratoria con enfoque cuantitativo. La "Evaluación de enfermería" del MOOC abordó el tema de la introducción al proceso de enfermería. La población de estudio consistió en participantes MOOC que tomaron el curso en la primera edición de octubre de 2016 a enero de 2017. Después de aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, la muestra final estuvo compuesta por 118 participantes. La recolección de datos consistió en datos de caracterización, percepción de presencia a través de la Encuesta de la Comunidad de Encuesta y dos preguntas abiertas. Resultados: 62 (53%) de los participantes desconocían la modalidad MOOC y 69 (58,5%) no habían tomado previamente este tipo de curso. El curso cumplió con las expectativas del 94,9% de los participantes. Cuando se compararon las puntuaciones medias de las tres dimensiones de la percepción de presencia, hubo una diferencia significativa (p <0.001), siendo la presencia de la enseñanza la dimensión mejor evaluada. Los puntajes más bajos se concentraron en la presencia social. Conclusión: La presencia de la enseñanza tuvo el puntaje promedio más alto entre las tres presencias evaluadas, lo que refleja la calidad de la planificación y el desarrollo de materiales digitales atractivos y de calidad.Objetivo: O objetivo do estudo foi analisar a avaliação realizada por estudantes de graduação em Enfermagem e de enfermeiros sobre o curso online, aberto e massivo (MOOC) ‘Avaliação de Enfermagem’. Métodos: Pesquisa do tipo exploratória com abordagem quantitativa. O MOOC ‘Avaliação de Enfermagem’ abordou a temática de introdução ao processo de Enfermagem. A população do estudo foi constituída pelos participantes do MOOC que realizaram o curso na primeira edição de outubro de 2016 a janeiro de 2017. Aplicados os critérios de inclusão e exclusão a amostra final foi composta por 118 participantes. A coleta de dados foi composta por dados de caracterização, a percepção de presença por meio do Community of Inquiry Survey e duas questões abertas. Resultados: A modalidade MOOC não era conhecida por 62 (53%) dos participantes e 69 (58,5%) não realizaram esse tipo de curso previamente. O curso atendeu as expectativas de 94,9% dos participantes. Quando comparados os escores médios das três dimensões de percepção de presença, houve diferença significativa (p<0,001), sendo a presença de ensino a dimensão melhor avaliada. As pontuações mais baixas se concentraram na presença social. Conclusão: A presença de ensino apresentou a pontuação média mais alta dentre as três presenças avaliadas, refletindo a qualidade do planejamento e o desenvolvimento de materiais digitais atrativos e de qualidade.Research, Society and Development2020-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/733810.33448/rsd-v9i9.7338Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e351997338Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e351997338Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e3519973382525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7338/6509Copyright (c) 2020 Cibele Duarte Parulla; Ana Luísa Petersen Cogo; Daiane Dal Paihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessParulla, Cibele DuarteCogo, Ana Luísa PetersenPai, Daiane Dal 2020-09-18T01:42:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7338Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:30:05.966632Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)
Evaluación de estudiantes de Enfermería y enfermeras de un curso en línea, abierto y masivo (MOOC)
Avaliação de estudantes de Enfermagem e enfermeiros de um curso online, aberto e massivo (MOOC)
title Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)
spellingShingle Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)
Parulla, Cibele Duarte
Education distance
Education nursing
Educational technology.
Educación a distancia
Educación en enfermería
Tecnología educacional.
Educação a distância
Educação em enfermagem
Tecnologias educacionais.
title_short Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)
title_full Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)
title_fullStr Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)
title_sort Evaluation of nursing students and Nurses of a massive open online course (MOOC)
author Parulla, Cibele Duarte
author_facet Parulla, Cibele Duarte
Cogo, Ana Luísa Petersen
Pai, Daiane Dal
author_role author
author2 Cogo, Ana Luísa Petersen
Pai, Daiane Dal
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Parulla, Cibele Duarte
Cogo, Ana Luísa Petersen
Pai, Daiane Dal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Education distance
Education nursing
Educational technology.
Educación a distancia
Educación en enfermería
Tecnología educacional.
Educação a distância
Educação em enfermagem
Tecnologias educacionais.
topic Education distance
Education nursing
Educational technology.
Educación a distancia
Educación en enfermería
Tecnología educacional.
Educação a distância
Educação em enfermagem
Tecnologias educacionais.
description Objective: The aim of the study was analyze nurses and nursing undergraduate students evaluation of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Nursing Evaluation. Method: Exploratory research with a quantitative approach. The MOOC ‘Nursing Assessment’ addressed the topic of introduction to the Nursing process. The study population consisted of MOOC participants who took the course in the first edition from October 2016 to January 2017. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final sample was composed of 118 participants. Data collection consisted of characterization data, presence perception through the Community of Inquiry Survey and two open questions. Results: The MOOC modality was not known by 62 (53%) of the participants and 69 (58.5%) had not previously taken this type of course. The course met the expectations of 94.9% of the participants. When comparing the average scores of the three dimensions of presence perception, there was a significant difference (p <0.001), with the presence of teaching being the dimension best evaluated. The lowest scores were concentrated on social presence. Conclusion: The teaching presence had the highest average score among the three presences evaluated, reflecting the quality of planning and the development of attractive and quality digital materials.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7338
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7338
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7338
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7338
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/7338/6509
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Cibele Duarte Parulla; Ana Luísa Petersen Cogo; Daiane Dal Pai
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Cibele Duarte Parulla; Ana Luísa Petersen Cogo; Daiane Dal Pai
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e351997338
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e351997338
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e351997338
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052779995332608