Organizational studies in post-modernity: a bibliometric study in the new millennium
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10829 |
Resumo: | In this paper, we look forward to understand what is the scope of scientific production about organizational studies on postmodernity. In order to achieve it, we perform a quantitative study (bibliometric), retrieving scientific articles indexed in the Web of Science base, in the period between 2000 and 2018. After applying several filters, we arrived at 432 works that were analyzed by the VOSviewer software. Among other points, we expose the oscillation of productions on the theme without a time interval, the main journals, the most cited authors and the suggestions for future studies raised by these papers. We concluded that organizational studies in postmodernity continue with a lot of attention from academia, since it was possible to detect a growth in the number of publications on the subject in this time frame, and, with this, we have assumed that this number tends to grow, encompassing more new themes, which indicates the possibility that the theme will be further explored in the future. |
id |
UNIFEI_0f4a31887fb1d9d02bb0073174ccd531 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10829 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Organizational studies in post-modernity: a bibliometric study in the new millenniumEstudios organizacionales en post-modernidad: un estudio bibliométrico en el nuevo milenioEstudos organizacionais pós-modernos: uma bibliometria no novo milênioPostmodernismOrganizationsBibliometricsOrganizational studies.PosmodernismoOrganizacionesBibliometríaEstudios organizacionales.Pós-modernismoOrganizaçõesBibliometriaEstudos organizacionais.In this paper, we look forward to understand what is the scope of scientific production about organizational studies on postmodernity. In order to achieve it, we perform a quantitative study (bibliometric), retrieving scientific articles indexed in the Web of Science base, in the period between 2000 and 2018. After applying several filters, we arrived at 432 works that were analyzed by the VOSviewer software. Among other points, we expose the oscillation of productions on the theme without a time interval, the main journals, the most cited authors and the suggestions for future studies raised by these papers. We concluded that organizational studies in postmodernity continue with a lot of attention from academia, since it was possible to detect a growth in the number of publications on the subject in this time frame, and, with this, we have assumed that this number tends to grow, encompassing more new themes, which indicates the possibility that the theme will be further explored in the future.En este artículo buscamos comprender el alcance de la producción científica sobre las organizaciones en la posmodernidad. Para ello, se utilizó un estudio cuantitativo (bibliometría), recuperando artículos científicos indexados a la base de datos Web of Science, en el período comprendido entre 2000 y 2018. Tras aplicar varios filtros, llegamos a 432 trabajos que fueron analizados por el software VOSviewer. Entre otros puntos, se expuso la oscilación de producciones sobre el tema en el intervalo de tiempo, las principales revistas, los autores más citados y las sugerencias para futuros estudios que plantean estos trabajos. Concluimos que los estudios organizacionales en la posmodernidad continúan atrayendo mucha atención desde la academia, ya que se pudo detectar en ese tiempo, un crecimiento en el número de publicaciones sobre el tema y, con ello, asumimos que este número tiende a crecer, abarcando cada vez más nuevos temas, lo que indica la posibilidad de que los estudios sobre las organizaciones en la posmodernidad se exploren más en el futuro.Neste artigo buscamos entender qual tem sido o escopo da produção científica sobre organizações na pós-modernidade. Para tal, recorremos a um estudo quantitativo (bibliometria), recuperando artigos científicos indexados à base de dados Web of Science, no período entre 2000 e 2018. Após a aplicação dos critérios de filtragem, selecionou-se 432 trabalhos, os quais foram analisados pelo software VOSviewer. Dentre os resultados, destaca-se a comportamento das produções cientificas sobre o tema no intervalo temporal, os periódicos e autores mais citados, bem como a sugestões para a realização de estudos futuros. Concluímos que os estudos organizacionais na pós-modernidade continuam atraindo muita atenção da academia, posto que no intervalo de tempo proposto, foi possível detectar nesse intervalo de tempo, um crescimento no número de publicações sobre o tema. Desse modo, supomos que esse número tende a crescer, abarcando cada vez mais novos temas, o que indica a possibilidade de que os estudos sobre as organizações na pós-modernidade sejam ainda mais explorados no futuro.Research, Society and Development2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1082910.33448/rsd-v9i12.10829Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e11891210829Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e11891210829Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e118912108292525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10829/9731Copyright (c) 2020 Marcelo Oliveira Junior; Ana Luiza Cordeiro Pereira; Rafael Rodolfo Sartorelli Sadocco; Juliana de Oliveira Becheri Souza; Alberdan José da Silva Teodorohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira Junior, MarceloPereira, Ana Luiza CordeiroSadocco, Rafael Rodolfo Sartorelli Souza, Juliana de Oliveira Becheri Teodoro, Alberdan José da Silva 2020-12-30T23:32:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10829Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:32:48.572376Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Organizational studies in post-modernity: a bibliometric study in the new millennium Estudios organizacionales en post-modernidad: un estudio bibliométrico en el nuevo milenio Estudos organizacionais pós-modernos: uma bibliometria no novo milênio |
title |
Organizational studies in post-modernity: a bibliometric study in the new millennium |
spellingShingle |
Organizational studies in post-modernity: a bibliometric study in the new millennium Oliveira Junior, Marcelo Postmodernism Organizations Bibliometrics Organizational studies. Posmodernismo Organizaciones Bibliometría Estudios organizacionales. Pós-modernismo Organizações Bibliometria Estudos organizacionais. |
title_short |
Organizational studies in post-modernity: a bibliometric study in the new millennium |
title_full |
Organizational studies in post-modernity: a bibliometric study in the new millennium |
title_fullStr |
Organizational studies in post-modernity: a bibliometric study in the new millennium |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organizational studies in post-modernity: a bibliometric study in the new millennium |
title_sort |
Organizational studies in post-modernity: a bibliometric study in the new millennium |
author |
Oliveira Junior, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Oliveira Junior, Marcelo Pereira, Ana Luiza Cordeiro Sadocco, Rafael Rodolfo Sartorelli Souza, Juliana de Oliveira Becheri Teodoro, Alberdan José da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Ana Luiza Cordeiro Sadocco, Rafael Rodolfo Sartorelli Souza, Juliana de Oliveira Becheri Teodoro, Alberdan José da Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira Junior, Marcelo Pereira, Ana Luiza Cordeiro Sadocco, Rafael Rodolfo Sartorelli Souza, Juliana de Oliveira Becheri Teodoro, Alberdan José da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Postmodernism Organizations Bibliometrics Organizational studies. Posmodernismo Organizaciones Bibliometría Estudios organizacionales. Pós-modernismo Organizações Bibliometria Estudos organizacionais. |
topic |
Postmodernism Organizations Bibliometrics Organizational studies. Posmodernismo Organizaciones Bibliometría Estudios organizacionales. Pós-modernismo Organizações Bibliometria Estudos organizacionais. |
description |
In this paper, we look forward to understand what is the scope of scientific production about organizational studies on postmodernity. In order to achieve it, we perform a quantitative study (bibliometric), retrieving scientific articles indexed in the Web of Science base, in the period between 2000 and 2018. After applying several filters, we arrived at 432 works that were analyzed by the VOSviewer software. Among other points, we expose the oscillation of productions on the theme without a time interval, the main journals, the most cited authors and the suggestions for future studies raised by these papers. We concluded that organizational studies in postmodernity continue with a lot of attention from academia, since it was possible to detect a growth in the number of publications on the subject in this time frame, and, with this, we have assumed that this number tends to grow, encompassing more new themes, which indicates the possibility that the theme will be further explored in the future. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10829 10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10829 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10829 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10829 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10829/9731 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e11891210829 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e11891210829 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e11891210829 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052665905020928 |