Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15753 |
Resumo: | This article addresses the (im) possibility of acknowledging dual socio-affective paternity and maternity, in cases where the third party, a genetic material donor, is willing to waive his right. The question raised is whether the Brazilian courts, when deciding only for the recognition of the socio-affective family, consisting of two fathers or two mothers, in cases of pregnancies with multiple parental ties due to the donation of genetic material by a third party, take into account the principle in the best interest of the child or adolescent. Therefore, it is necessary, therefore, to make an analysis of the positions established by the Brazilian courts. The scientific article was developed from the qualitative method, through a doctrinal and jurisprudential review, as well as a bibliographic survey in journals and scientific articles. The research method was hypothetical-deductive. The research presents a brief study on the institute of family law, which is later dealt with social paternity and maternity, ending with the analysis of the position adopted by Brazilian courts with regard to cases of pregnancies with multiple ties. As a result of this work, it was possible to verify that the position that begins to spread by the Brazilian courts, in cases of donation of genetic material by a third party and who has no interest in participating in the child's life, is in a favorable sense, that is, the possibility of there is only recognition of dual socio-affective paternity and maternity in favor of the child's best interests. |
id |
UNIFEI_12e504166169f44ea010d47d53902fa0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15753 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principleMultiplicidad de lazos parentales: Un análisis basado en el principio del mejor interésMultiplicidade de vínculos parentais: Uma análise a partir do princípio do melhor interesseMultiparentingChildPossibilityRecognitionSocio-affectivity.MultiparentingNiñoPosibilidadReconocimientoSocio-afectividad.MultiparentalidadeCriançaPossibilidadeReconhecimentoSocioafetividade.This article addresses the (im) possibility of acknowledging dual socio-affective paternity and maternity, in cases where the third party, a genetic material donor, is willing to waive his right. The question raised is whether the Brazilian courts, when deciding only for the recognition of the socio-affective family, consisting of two fathers or two mothers, in cases of pregnancies with multiple parental ties due to the donation of genetic material by a third party, take into account the principle in the best interest of the child or adolescent. Therefore, it is necessary, therefore, to make an analysis of the positions established by the Brazilian courts. The scientific article was developed from the qualitative method, through a doctrinal and jurisprudential review, as well as a bibliographic survey in journals and scientific articles. The research method was hypothetical-deductive. The research presents a brief study on the institute of family law, which is later dealt with social paternity and maternity, ending with the analysis of the position adopted by Brazilian courts with regard to cases of pregnancies with multiple ties. As a result of this work, it was possible to verify that the position that begins to spread by the Brazilian courts, in cases of donation of genetic material by a third party and who has no interest in participating in the child's life, is in a favorable sense, that is, the possibility of there is only recognition of dual socio-affective paternity and maternity in favor of the child's best interests.Este artículo aborda la (im) posibilidad de reconocer la dual paternidad y maternidad socioafectiva, en los casos en que el tercero, donante de material genético, esté dispuesto a renunciar a su derecho. La pregunta que se plantea es si los tribunales brasileños, al decidir únicamente por el reconocimiento de la familia socioafectiva, formada por dos padres o dos madres, en casos de embarazos con múltiples vínculos parentales por donación de material genético por parte de un tercero, tener en cuenta el principio del interés superior del niño, niña o adolescente. Por tanto, es necesario, por tanto, hacer un análisis de las posiciones establecidas por los tribunales brasileños. El artículo científico se desarrolló a partir del método cualitativo, mediante una revisión doctrinal y jurisprudencial, así como un relevamiento bibliográfico en revistas y artículos científicos. El método de investigación fue hipotético-deductivo. La investigación presenta un breve estudio sobre el instituto de derecho de familia, que luego se trata de la paternidad social y la maternidad, finalizando con el análisis de la posición adoptada por los tribunales brasileños con respecto a los casos de embarazos con múltiples vínculos. Como resultado de este trabajo, se pudo constatar que la posición que comienza a difundir por los tribunales brasileños, en casos de donación de material genético por un tercero y que no tiene interés en participar en la vida del niño, es de una sentido favorable, es decir, la posibilidad de que sólo se reconozca la dual paternidad y maternidad socioafectiva a favor del interés superior del niño.O presente artigo aborda a (im) possibilidade do reconhecimento da dupla paternidade ou maternidade socioafetivas, em casos onde o terceiro, doador de material genético, está disposto a renunciar seu direito. A questão levantada é se os tribunais brasileiros, ao decidirem apenas pelo reconhecimento da família socioafetiva, constituída por dois pais ou duas mães, nos casos de gestações com multiplicidade de vínculos parentais em face de doação de material genético por terceiro, levam em consideração o princípio do melhor interesse da criança ou adolescente. Assim, necessário, portanto, fazer uma análise acerca dos posicionamentos firmados pelos tribunais brasileiros. O artigo científico desenvolveu-se a partir do método qualitativo, mediante revisão doutrinária e jurisprudencial, bem como levantamento bibliográfico em revistas e artigos científicos. O método de pesquisa foi o hipotético-dedutivo. A pesquisa apresenta um breve estudo sobre o instituto do direito de família, sendo posteriormente tratado acerca da paternidade e maternidade sociafetiva, finalizando com a análise do posicionamento adotado pelos tribunais brasileiros no que diz respeito aos casos de gestações com multiplicidade de vínculos. Como resultado deste trabalho foi possível verificar que o posicionamento que começa a se difundir pelos tribunais brasileiros, nos casos de doação de material genético por terceiro e que não tem interesse em participar da vida da criança é no sentido favorável, ou seja, da possibilidade de haver apenas o reconhecimento da dupla paternidade ou maternidade socioafetivas em prol do superior interesse da criança.Research, Society and Development2021-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1575310.33448/rsd-v10i8.15753Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e51510815753Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e51510815753Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e515108157532525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15753/15739Copyright (c) 2021 Tamires Cezimbra Medina ; Angela Simone Pires Keitel; Vanessa Steigleder Neubauer; Deivid Jonas Silda da Veiga; Aline Antunes Gomes; Ieda Márcia Donati Linckhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedina , Tamires Cezimbra Keitel, Angela Simone Pires Neubauer, Vanessa SteiglederVeiga, Deivid Jonas Silda daGomes, Aline AntunesLinck, Ieda Márcia Donati 2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15753Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:36:31.085237Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle Multiplicidad de lazos parentales: Un análisis basado en el principio del mejor interés Multiplicidade de vínculos parentais: Uma análise a partir do princípio do melhor interesse |
title |
Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle |
spellingShingle |
Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle Medina , Tamires Cezimbra Multiparenting Child Possibility Recognition Socio-affectivity. Multiparenting Niño Posibilidad Reconocimiento Socio-afectividad. Multiparentalidade Criança Possibilidade Reconhecimento Socioafetividade. |
title_short |
Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle |
title_full |
Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle |
title_fullStr |
Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle |
title_sort |
Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle |
author |
Medina , Tamires Cezimbra |
author_facet |
Medina , Tamires Cezimbra Keitel, Angela Simone Pires Neubauer, Vanessa Steigleder Veiga, Deivid Jonas Silda da Gomes, Aline Antunes Linck, Ieda Márcia Donati |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Keitel, Angela Simone Pires Neubauer, Vanessa Steigleder Veiga, Deivid Jonas Silda da Gomes, Aline Antunes Linck, Ieda Márcia Donati |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medina , Tamires Cezimbra Keitel, Angela Simone Pires Neubauer, Vanessa Steigleder Veiga, Deivid Jonas Silda da Gomes, Aline Antunes Linck, Ieda Márcia Donati |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multiparenting Child Possibility Recognition Socio-affectivity. Multiparenting Niño Posibilidad Reconocimiento Socio-afectividad. Multiparentalidade Criança Possibilidade Reconhecimento Socioafetividade. |
topic |
Multiparenting Child Possibility Recognition Socio-affectivity. Multiparenting Niño Posibilidad Reconocimiento Socio-afectividad. Multiparentalidade Criança Possibilidade Reconhecimento Socioafetividade. |
description |
This article addresses the (im) possibility of acknowledging dual socio-affective paternity and maternity, in cases where the third party, a genetic material donor, is willing to waive his right. The question raised is whether the Brazilian courts, when deciding only for the recognition of the socio-affective family, consisting of two fathers or two mothers, in cases of pregnancies with multiple parental ties due to the donation of genetic material by a third party, take into account the principle in the best interest of the child or adolescent. Therefore, it is necessary, therefore, to make an analysis of the positions established by the Brazilian courts. The scientific article was developed from the qualitative method, through a doctrinal and jurisprudential review, as well as a bibliographic survey in journals and scientific articles. The research method was hypothetical-deductive. The research presents a brief study on the institute of family law, which is later dealt with social paternity and maternity, ending with the analysis of the position adopted by Brazilian courts with regard to cases of pregnancies with multiple ties. As a result of this work, it was possible to verify that the position that begins to spread by the Brazilian courts, in cases of donation of genetic material by a third party and who has no interest in participating in the child's life, is in a favorable sense, that is, the possibility of there is only recognition of dual socio-affective paternity and maternity in favor of the child's best interests. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15753 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.15753 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15753 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.15753 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15753/15739 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e51510815753 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e51510815753 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e51510815753 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052678268780544 |