Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Medina , Tamires Cezimbra
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Keitel, Angela Simone Pires, Neubauer, Vanessa Steigleder, Veiga, Deivid Jonas Silda da, Gomes, Aline Antunes, Linck, Ieda Márcia Donati
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15753
Resumo: This article addresses the (im) possibility of acknowledging dual socio-affective paternity and maternity, in cases where the third party, a genetic material donor, is willing to waive his right. The question raised is whether the Brazilian courts, when deciding only for the recognition of the socio-affective family, consisting of two fathers or two mothers, in cases of pregnancies with multiple parental ties due to the donation of genetic material by a third party, take into account the principle in the best interest of the child or adolescent. Therefore, it is necessary, therefore, to make an analysis of the positions established by the Brazilian courts. The scientific article was developed from the qualitative method, through a doctrinal and jurisprudential review, as well as a bibliographic survey in journals and scientific articles. The research method was hypothetical-deductive. The research presents a brief study on the institute of family law, which is later dealt with social paternity and maternity, ending with the analysis of the position adopted by Brazilian courts with regard to cases of pregnancies with multiple ties. As a result of this work, it was possible to verify that the position that begins to spread by the Brazilian courts, in cases of donation of genetic material by a third party and who has no interest in participating in the child's life, is in a favorable sense, that is, the possibility of there is only recognition of dual socio-affective paternity and maternity in favor of the child's best interests.
id UNIFEI_12e504166169f44ea010d47d53902fa0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15753
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principleMultiplicidad de lazos parentales: Un análisis basado en el principio del mejor interésMultiplicidade de vínculos parentais: Uma análise a partir do princípio do melhor interesseMultiparentingChildPossibilityRecognitionSocio-affectivity.MultiparentingNiñoPosibilidadReconocimientoSocio-afectividad.MultiparentalidadeCriançaPossibilidadeReconhecimentoSocioafetividade.This article addresses the (im) possibility of acknowledging dual socio-affective paternity and maternity, in cases where the third party, a genetic material donor, is willing to waive his right. The question raised is whether the Brazilian courts, when deciding only for the recognition of the socio-affective family, consisting of two fathers or two mothers, in cases of pregnancies with multiple parental ties due to the donation of genetic material by a third party, take into account the principle in the best interest of the child or adolescent. Therefore, it is necessary, therefore, to make an analysis of the positions established by the Brazilian courts. The scientific article was developed from the qualitative method, through a doctrinal and jurisprudential review, as well as a bibliographic survey in journals and scientific articles. The research method was hypothetical-deductive. The research presents a brief study on the institute of family law, which is later dealt with social paternity and maternity, ending with the analysis of the position adopted by Brazilian courts with regard to cases of pregnancies with multiple ties. As a result of this work, it was possible to verify that the position that begins to spread by the Brazilian courts, in cases of donation of genetic material by a third party and who has no interest in participating in the child's life, is in a favorable sense, that is, the possibility of there is only recognition of dual socio-affective paternity and maternity in favor of the child's best interests.Este artículo aborda la (im) posibilidad de reconocer la dual paternidad y maternidad socioafectiva, en los casos en que el tercero, donante de material genético, esté dispuesto a renunciar a su derecho. La pregunta que se plantea es si los tribunales brasileños, al decidir únicamente por el reconocimiento de la familia socioafectiva, formada por dos padres o dos madres, en casos de embarazos con múltiples vínculos parentales por donación de material genético por parte de un tercero, tener en cuenta el principio del interés superior del niño, niña o adolescente. Por tanto, es necesario, por tanto, hacer un análisis de las posiciones establecidas por los tribunales brasileños. El artículo científico se desarrolló a partir del método cualitativo, mediante una revisión doctrinal y jurisprudencial, así como un relevamiento bibliográfico en revistas y artículos científicos. El método de investigación fue hipotético-deductivo. La investigación presenta un breve estudio sobre el instituto de derecho de familia, que luego se trata de la paternidad social y la maternidad, finalizando con el análisis de la posición adoptada por los tribunales brasileños con respecto a los casos de embarazos con múltiples vínculos. Como resultado de este trabajo, se pudo constatar que la posición que comienza a difundir por los tribunales brasileños, en casos de donación de material genético por un tercero y que no tiene interés en participar en la vida del niño, es de una sentido favorable, es decir, la posibilidad de que sólo se reconozca la dual paternidad y maternidad socioafectiva a favor del interés superior del niño.O presente artigo aborda a (im) possibilidade do reconhecimento da dupla paternidade ou maternidade socioafetivas, em casos onde o terceiro, doador de material genético, está disposto a renunciar seu direito. A questão levantada é se os tribunais brasileiros, ao decidirem apenas pelo reconhecimento da família socioafetiva, constituída por dois pais ou duas mães, nos casos de gestações com multiplicidade de vínculos parentais em face de doação de material genético por terceiro, levam em consideração o princípio do melhor interesse da criança ou adolescente. Assim, necessário, portanto, fazer uma análise acerca dos posicionamentos firmados pelos tribunais brasileiros. O artigo científico desenvolveu-se a partir do método qualitativo, mediante revisão doutrinária e jurisprudencial, bem como levantamento bibliográfico em revistas e artigos científicos. O método de pesquisa foi o hipotético-dedutivo. A pesquisa apresenta um breve estudo sobre o instituto do direito de família, sendo posteriormente tratado acerca da paternidade e maternidade sociafetiva, finalizando com a análise do posicionamento adotado pelos tribunais brasileiros no que diz respeito aos casos de gestações com multiplicidade de vínculos. Como resultado deste trabalho foi possível verificar que o posicionamento que começa a se difundir pelos tribunais brasileiros, nos casos de doação de material genético por terceiro e que não tem interesse em participar da vida da criança é no sentido favorável, ou seja, da possibilidade de haver apenas o reconhecimento da dupla paternidade ou maternidade socioafetivas em prol do superior interesse da criança.Research, Society and Development2021-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1575310.33448/rsd-v10i8.15753Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e51510815753Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e51510815753Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e515108157532525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15753/15739Copyright (c) 2021 Tamires Cezimbra Medina ; Angela Simone Pires Keitel; Vanessa Steigleder Neubauer; Deivid Jonas Silda da Veiga; Aline Antunes Gomes; Ieda Márcia Donati Linckhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMedina , Tamires Cezimbra Keitel, Angela Simone Pires Neubauer, Vanessa SteiglederVeiga, Deivid Jonas Silda daGomes, Aline AntunesLinck, Ieda Márcia Donati 2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15753Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:36:31.085237Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle
Multiplicidad de lazos parentales: Un análisis basado en el principio del mejor interés
Multiplicidade de vínculos parentais: Uma análise a partir do princípio do melhor interesse
title Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle
spellingShingle Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle
Medina , Tamires Cezimbra
Multiparenting
Child
Possibility
Recognition
Socio-affectivity.
Multiparenting
Niño
Posibilidad
Reconocimiento
Socio-afectividad.
Multiparentalidade
Criança
Possibilidade
Reconhecimento
Socioafetividade.
title_short Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle
title_full Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle
title_fullStr Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle
title_full_unstemmed Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle
title_sort Multiplicity of parental bonds: A partial analysis of the better interest principle
author Medina , Tamires Cezimbra
author_facet Medina , Tamires Cezimbra
Keitel, Angela Simone Pires
Neubauer, Vanessa Steigleder
Veiga, Deivid Jonas Silda da
Gomes, Aline Antunes
Linck, Ieda Márcia Donati
author_role author
author2 Keitel, Angela Simone Pires
Neubauer, Vanessa Steigleder
Veiga, Deivid Jonas Silda da
Gomes, Aline Antunes
Linck, Ieda Márcia Donati
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Medina , Tamires Cezimbra
Keitel, Angela Simone Pires
Neubauer, Vanessa Steigleder
Veiga, Deivid Jonas Silda da
Gomes, Aline Antunes
Linck, Ieda Márcia Donati
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Multiparenting
Child
Possibility
Recognition
Socio-affectivity.
Multiparenting
Niño
Posibilidad
Reconocimiento
Socio-afectividad.
Multiparentalidade
Criança
Possibilidade
Reconhecimento
Socioafetividade.
topic Multiparenting
Child
Possibility
Recognition
Socio-affectivity.
Multiparenting
Niño
Posibilidad
Reconocimiento
Socio-afectividad.
Multiparentalidade
Criança
Possibilidade
Reconhecimento
Socioafetividade.
description This article addresses the (im) possibility of acknowledging dual socio-affective paternity and maternity, in cases where the third party, a genetic material donor, is willing to waive his right. The question raised is whether the Brazilian courts, when deciding only for the recognition of the socio-affective family, consisting of two fathers or two mothers, in cases of pregnancies with multiple parental ties due to the donation of genetic material by a third party, take into account the principle in the best interest of the child or adolescent. Therefore, it is necessary, therefore, to make an analysis of the positions established by the Brazilian courts. The scientific article was developed from the qualitative method, through a doctrinal and jurisprudential review, as well as a bibliographic survey in journals and scientific articles. The research method was hypothetical-deductive. The research presents a brief study on the institute of family law, which is later dealt with social paternity and maternity, ending with the analysis of the position adopted by Brazilian courts with regard to cases of pregnancies with multiple ties. As a result of this work, it was possible to verify that the position that begins to spread by the Brazilian courts, in cases of donation of genetic material by a third party and who has no interest in participating in the child's life, is in a favorable sense, that is, the possibility of there is only recognition of dual socio-affective paternity and maternity in favor of the child's best interests.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15753
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.15753
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15753
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.15753
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15753/15739
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e51510815753
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e51510815753
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e51510815753
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052678268780544