Evaluation of tuberculosis qualification for healthcare professionals: proposal of a systematic model
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21262 |
Resumo: | Objective: to propose a systematic model for the assessment of tuberculosis (TB) qualification for health professionals. Method: quantitative methodological investigation study, developed in the city of Porto Velho-RO, in three stages for the elaboration, content validation and pilot test of the evaluation instrument, to be applied in the qualifications in TB, after complying with the ethical precepts. The first instrument (pre and post-test), consisted of 18 questions divided into three sections. The second instrument (late post-test), was composed of two open questions. The validation of the instruments occurred based on the assessment of the clarity, relevance and pertinence of the questions by experts on the subject. Results: the instruments remained with the same number of items, but they were changed in terms of writing for better understanding. Conclusions: the evaluation instrument developed has content and appearance validity, and is compatible for the evaluation of TB qualification, as a feedback tool for managers and participants. |
id |
UNIFEI_318c4d2e271817738b4deaa107b2e68a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21262 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of tuberculosis qualification for healthcare professionals: proposal of a systematic modelEvaluación de cualificación en tuberculosis para profesionales de la salud: propuesta de modelo sistemáticoAvaliação da qualificação em tuberculose para profissionais de saúde: proposta de um modelo sistematizadoTuberculoseQualificação Profissional em SaúdePessoal de SaúdeEstudos de validação.TuberculosisCualificación profesional en saludPersonal de SaludEstudios de validación.TuberculosisProfessional Qualification in HealthHealth PersonnelValidation studies.Objective: to propose a systematic model for the assessment of tuberculosis (TB) qualification for health professionals. Method: quantitative methodological investigation study, developed in the city of Porto Velho-RO, in three stages for the elaboration, content validation and pilot test of the evaluation instrument, to be applied in the qualifications in TB, after complying with the ethical precepts. The first instrument (pre and post-test), consisted of 18 questions divided into three sections. The second instrument (late post-test), was composed of two open questions. The validation of the instruments occurred based on the assessment of the clarity, relevance and pertinence of the questions by experts on the subject. Results: the instruments remained with the same number of items, but they were changed in terms of writing for better understanding. Conclusions: the evaluation instrument developed has content and appearance validity, and is compatible for the evaluation of TB qualification, as a feedback tool for managers and participants.Objetivo: proponer un modelo sistemático para la evaluación de la calificación de tuberculosis (TB) para profesionales de la salud. Método: estudio de investigación metodológica cuantitativa, desarrollado en la ciudad de Porto Velho-RO, en tres etapas para la elaboración, validación de contenido y prueba piloto del instrumento de evaluación, para ser aplicado en las calificaciones en TB, luego de cumplir con los preceptos éticos. El primer instrumento (pre y post-test), constaba de 18 preguntas divididas en tres apartados. El segundo instrumento (posprueba tardía), estuvo compuesto por dos preguntas abiertas. La validación de los instrumentos se dio a partir de la valoración de la claridad, relevancia y pertinencia de las preguntas por parte de expertos en el tema. Resultados: los instrumentos se mantuvieron con el mismo número de ítems, pero se modificaron en cuanto a redacción para una mejor comprensión. Conclusiones: el instrumento de evaluación desarrollado tiene validez de contenido y apariencia, y es compatible para la evaluación de la calificación de TB, como herramienta de retroalimentación para gestores y participantes.Objetivo: propor um modelo sistematizado de avaliação da qualificação em tuberculose (TB) para profissionais de saúde. Método: estudo de investigação metodológica quantitativa, desenvolvido no município de Porto Velho-RO, em três etapas para elaboração, validação de conteúdo e teste-piloto do instrumento de avaliação, para ser aplicado nas qualificações em TB, após atendidos os preceitos éticos. O primeiro instrumento (pré e pós-teste), foi constituído de 18 questões divididas em três seções. O segundo instrumento (pós-teste tardio), foi composto de duas questões abertas. A validação dos instrumentos ocorreu a partir da avaliação acerca da clareza, relevância e pertinência das questões por peritos na temática. Resultados: os instrumentos permaneceram com a mesma quantidade de itens, porém foram alterados quanto à escrita para melhor compreensão. Conclusões: o instrumento de avaliação elaborado possui validade de conteúdo e aparência, e é compatível para a avaliação da qualificação em TB, como ferramenta de feedback para gestor e participantes.Research, Society and Development2021-10-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2126210.33448/rsd-v10i13.21262Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e332101321262Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e332101321262Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e3321013212622525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21262/18972Copyright (c) 2021 Leticia Auxiliadora Fragoso da Silva; Ana Lúcia Escobar; Cleoni Alves Mendes de Lima; Reinaldo Antônio da Silva-Sobrinho; Melisane Regina Lima Ferreira; Nathalia Halax Orfãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Leticia Auxiliadora Fragoso daEscobar, Ana LúciaLima, Cleoni Alves Mendes deSilva-Sobrinho, Reinaldo Antônio daFerreira, Melisane Regina LimaOrfão, Nathalia Halax2021-11-21T18:26:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21262Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:43.148775Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of tuberculosis qualification for healthcare professionals: proposal of a systematic model Evaluación de cualificación en tuberculosis para profesionales de la salud: propuesta de modelo sistemático Avaliação da qualificação em tuberculose para profissionais de saúde: proposta de um modelo sistematizado |
title |
Evaluation of tuberculosis qualification for healthcare professionals: proposal of a systematic model |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of tuberculosis qualification for healthcare professionals: proposal of a systematic model Silva, Leticia Auxiliadora Fragoso da Tuberculose Qualificação Profissional em Saúde Pessoal de Saúde Estudos de validação. Tuberculosis Cualificación profesional en salud Personal de Salud Estudios de validación. Tuberculosis Professional Qualification in Health Health Personnel Validation studies. |
title_short |
Evaluation of tuberculosis qualification for healthcare professionals: proposal of a systematic model |
title_full |
Evaluation of tuberculosis qualification for healthcare professionals: proposal of a systematic model |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of tuberculosis qualification for healthcare professionals: proposal of a systematic model |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of tuberculosis qualification for healthcare professionals: proposal of a systematic model |
title_sort |
Evaluation of tuberculosis qualification for healthcare professionals: proposal of a systematic model |
author |
Silva, Leticia Auxiliadora Fragoso da |
author_facet |
Silva, Leticia Auxiliadora Fragoso da Escobar, Ana Lúcia Lima, Cleoni Alves Mendes de Silva-Sobrinho, Reinaldo Antônio da Ferreira, Melisane Regina Lima Orfão, Nathalia Halax |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Escobar, Ana Lúcia Lima, Cleoni Alves Mendes de Silva-Sobrinho, Reinaldo Antônio da Ferreira, Melisane Regina Lima Orfão, Nathalia Halax |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Leticia Auxiliadora Fragoso da Escobar, Ana Lúcia Lima, Cleoni Alves Mendes de Silva-Sobrinho, Reinaldo Antônio da Ferreira, Melisane Regina Lima Orfão, Nathalia Halax |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tuberculose Qualificação Profissional em Saúde Pessoal de Saúde Estudos de validação. Tuberculosis Cualificación profesional en salud Personal de Salud Estudios de validación. Tuberculosis Professional Qualification in Health Health Personnel Validation studies. |
topic |
Tuberculose Qualificação Profissional em Saúde Pessoal de Saúde Estudos de validação. Tuberculosis Cualificación profesional en salud Personal de Salud Estudios de validación. Tuberculosis Professional Qualification in Health Health Personnel Validation studies. |
description |
Objective: to propose a systematic model for the assessment of tuberculosis (TB) qualification for health professionals. Method: quantitative methodological investigation study, developed in the city of Porto Velho-RO, in three stages for the elaboration, content validation and pilot test of the evaluation instrument, to be applied in the qualifications in TB, after complying with the ethical precepts. The first instrument (pre and post-test), consisted of 18 questions divided into three sections. The second instrument (late post-test), was composed of two open questions. The validation of the instruments occurred based on the assessment of the clarity, relevance and pertinence of the questions by experts on the subject. Results: the instruments remained with the same number of items, but they were changed in terms of writing for better understanding. Conclusions: the evaluation instrument developed has content and appearance validity, and is compatible for the evaluation of TB qualification, as a feedback tool for managers and participants. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21262 10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21262 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21262 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21262 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21262/18972 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e332101321262 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e332101321262 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e332101321262 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052756750499840 |