The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Alessandra Frei
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21579
Resumo: This article aims to demonstrate the exceptions to the rule of publicity of procedural and administrative acts provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure. For this purpose, it describes the hypotheses in which the secrecy of justice may be conferred on a process, noting that the hypotheses are restricted to the exhaustive list provided for the Code of Civil Procedure, as well as the analysis of the fundamental right to publicity of procedural and administrative acts, as well as its intrinsic relation with the right to access to justice, the adversary system and full defense, describing that the hypotheses of secrecy of justice do not constitute an affront to the Federal Constitution, insofar as they also aim to protect certain situations related to the right to intimacy and private life of the parties, being the reason for the aforementioned exhaustive list provided for in the civil procedural diploma. Therefore, it was concluded that using weighting criteria and the analysis of the concrete case, neither the hypothesis of secrecy of justice, nor the rule of publicity of the acts, constitutes a violation of rights. We opted for the deductive methodology, with bibliographical research in doctrine, Federal Constitution and infra-constitutional legislation.
id UNIFEI_4953877c70b7686669954e58fedffcf7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21579
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil ProcedureEl secreto de justicia y la publicidad de actos procesales y administrativos en el Código de Procedimiento CivilO segredo de justiça e a publicidade dos atos processuais e administrativos no Código de Processo Civil PublicidadSecreto de juticiaProceso.PublicicySecrecy of justiceProcess.PublicidadeSegredo de justiçaProcesso.This article aims to demonstrate the exceptions to the rule of publicity of procedural and administrative acts provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure. For this purpose, it describes the hypotheses in which the secrecy of justice may be conferred on a process, noting that the hypotheses are restricted to the exhaustive list provided for the Code of Civil Procedure, as well as the analysis of the fundamental right to publicity of procedural and administrative acts, as well as its intrinsic relation with the right to access to justice, the adversary system and full defense, describing that the hypotheses of secrecy of justice do not constitute an affront to the Federal Constitution, insofar as they also aim to protect certain situations related to the right to intimacy and private life of the parties, being the reason for the aforementioned exhaustive list provided for in the civil procedural diploma. Therefore, it was concluded that using weighting criteria and the analysis of the concrete case, neither the hypothesis of secrecy of justice, nor the rule of publicity of the acts, constitutes a violation of rights. We opted for the deductive methodology, with bibliographical research in doctrine, Federal Constitution and infra-constitutional legislation.Este artículo tiene como objetivo demostrar las excepciones a la regla de publicidad de los actos procesales y administrativos previstas en el Código de Procedimiento Civil. Por tanto, describe las hipótesis en las que se puede conferir el secreto de justicia a un proceso, señalando que las hipótesis se limitan a la lista exhaustiva prevista en el Código de Procedimiento Civil, así como el análisis del derecho fundamental a la publicidad de los actos procesales y administrativos, así como su relación intrínseca con el derecho de acceso a la justicia, el sistema contradictorio y la defensa plena, describiendo que las hipótesis del secreto de justicia no constituyen una atentado a la Constitución Federal, en la medida en que también pretenden proteger determinadas situaciones relacionadas con el derecho a la intimidad y la vida privada de las partes, siendo el motivo de la lista exhaustiva antes mencionada prevista en el diploma procesal civil. Por tanto, se concluyó que utilizando criterios de ponderación y el análisis del caso específico, ni la hipótesis del secreto de justicia, ni la regla de publicidad de los hechos, constituyen una violación de derechos. Se optó por la metodología deductiva, con investigación bibliográfica en doctrina, Constitución Federal y legislación infraconstitucional.O presente artigo objetiva demonstrar as exceções à regra da publicidade dos atos processuais e administrativos prevista no Código de Processo Civil. Para tanto, descreve as hipóteses em que poderá ser conferido o segredo de justiça a um processo, ressaltando que as hipóteses estão restritas ao rol taxativo previsto no Código de Processo Civil, bem como procede-se com a análise do direito fundamental à publicidade dos atos processuais e administrativos bem como a sua intrínseca relação com os direito ao acesso à justiça, ao contraditório e à ampla defesa, descrevendo que as hipóteses de segredo de justiça não constituem afronta à Constituição Federal, na medida em que igualmente objetivam resguardar determinadas situações relacionadas ao direito à intimidade e vida privada das partes, sendo a razão de ser do referido rol taxativo previsto no diploma processual civil. Logo, concluiu-se que valendo-se de critérios de ponderação e pela análise do caso concreto, nem a hipótese de segredo de justiça, nem a regra da publicidade dos atos, constituem violação de direitos. Optou-se pela metodologia dedutiva, com pesquisas bibliográficas em doutrina, Constituição Federal e em legislação infraconstitucional.Research, Society and Development2021-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2157910.33448/rsd-v10i13.21579Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e426101321579Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e426101321579Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e4261013215792525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21579/19064Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandra Frei Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Alessandra Frei 2021-11-21T18:26:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21579Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:58.291450Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure
El secreto de justicia y la publicidad de actos procesales y administrativos en el Código de Procedimiento Civil
O segredo de justiça e a publicidade dos atos processuais e administrativos no Código de Processo Civil
title The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure
spellingShingle The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure
Silva, Alessandra Frei
Publicidad
Secreto de juticia
Proceso.
Publicicy
Secrecy of justice
Process.
Publicidade
Segredo de justiça
Processo.
title_short The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure
title_full The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure
title_fullStr The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure
title_full_unstemmed The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure
title_sort The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure
author Silva, Alessandra Frei
author_facet Silva, Alessandra Frei
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Alessandra Frei
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Publicidad
Secreto de juticia
Proceso.
Publicicy
Secrecy of justice
Process.
Publicidade
Segredo de justiça
Processo.
topic Publicidad
Secreto de juticia
Proceso.
Publicicy
Secrecy of justice
Process.
Publicidade
Segredo de justiça
Processo.
description This article aims to demonstrate the exceptions to the rule of publicity of procedural and administrative acts provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure. For this purpose, it describes the hypotheses in which the secrecy of justice may be conferred on a process, noting that the hypotheses are restricted to the exhaustive list provided for the Code of Civil Procedure, as well as the analysis of the fundamental right to publicity of procedural and administrative acts, as well as its intrinsic relation with the right to access to justice, the adversary system and full defense, describing that the hypotheses of secrecy of justice do not constitute an affront to the Federal Constitution, insofar as they also aim to protect certain situations related to the right to intimacy and private life of the parties, being the reason for the aforementioned exhaustive list provided for in the civil procedural diploma. Therefore, it was concluded that using weighting criteria and the analysis of the concrete case, neither the hypothesis of secrecy of justice, nor the rule of publicity of the acts, constitutes a violation of rights. We opted for the deductive methodology, with bibliographical research in doctrine, Federal Constitution and infra-constitutional legislation.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21579
10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21579
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21579
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21579
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21579/19064
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandra Frei Silva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandra Frei Silva
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e426101321579
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e426101321579
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e426101321579
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052789777498112