The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21579 |
Resumo: | This article aims to demonstrate the exceptions to the rule of publicity of procedural and administrative acts provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure. For this purpose, it describes the hypotheses in which the secrecy of justice may be conferred on a process, noting that the hypotheses are restricted to the exhaustive list provided for the Code of Civil Procedure, as well as the analysis of the fundamental right to publicity of procedural and administrative acts, as well as its intrinsic relation with the right to access to justice, the adversary system and full defense, describing that the hypotheses of secrecy of justice do not constitute an affront to the Federal Constitution, insofar as they also aim to protect certain situations related to the right to intimacy and private life of the parties, being the reason for the aforementioned exhaustive list provided for in the civil procedural diploma. Therefore, it was concluded that using weighting criteria and the analysis of the concrete case, neither the hypothesis of secrecy of justice, nor the rule of publicity of the acts, constitutes a violation of rights. We opted for the deductive methodology, with bibliographical research in doctrine, Federal Constitution and infra-constitutional legislation. |
id |
UNIFEI_4953877c70b7686669954e58fedffcf7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21579 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil ProcedureEl secreto de justicia y la publicidad de actos procesales y administrativos en el Código de Procedimiento CivilO segredo de justiça e a publicidade dos atos processuais e administrativos no Código de Processo Civil PublicidadSecreto de juticiaProceso.PublicicySecrecy of justiceProcess.PublicidadeSegredo de justiçaProcesso.This article aims to demonstrate the exceptions to the rule of publicity of procedural and administrative acts provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure. For this purpose, it describes the hypotheses in which the secrecy of justice may be conferred on a process, noting that the hypotheses are restricted to the exhaustive list provided for the Code of Civil Procedure, as well as the analysis of the fundamental right to publicity of procedural and administrative acts, as well as its intrinsic relation with the right to access to justice, the adversary system and full defense, describing that the hypotheses of secrecy of justice do not constitute an affront to the Federal Constitution, insofar as they also aim to protect certain situations related to the right to intimacy and private life of the parties, being the reason for the aforementioned exhaustive list provided for in the civil procedural diploma. Therefore, it was concluded that using weighting criteria and the analysis of the concrete case, neither the hypothesis of secrecy of justice, nor the rule of publicity of the acts, constitutes a violation of rights. We opted for the deductive methodology, with bibliographical research in doctrine, Federal Constitution and infra-constitutional legislation.Este artículo tiene como objetivo demostrar las excepciones a la regla de publicidad de los actos procesales y administrativos previstas en el Código de Procedimiento Civil. Por tanto, describe las hipótesis en las que se puede conferir el secreto de justicia a un proceso, señalando que las hipótesis se limitan a la lista exhaustiva prevista en el Código de Procedimiento Civil, así como el análisis del derecho fundamental a la publicidad de los actos procesales y administrativos, así como su relación intrínseca con el derecho de acceso a la justicia, el sistema contradictorio y la defensa plena, describiendo que las hipótesis del secreto de justicia no constituyen una atentado a la Constitución Federal, en la medida en que también pretenden proteger determinadas situaciones relacionadas con el derecho a la intimidad y la vida privada de las partes, siendo el motivo de la lista exhaustiva antes mencionada prevista en el diploma procesal civil. Por tanto, se concluyó que utilizando criterios de ponderación y el análisis del caso específico, ni la hipótesis del secreto de justicia, ni la regla de publicidad de los hechos, constituyen una violación de derechos. Se optó por la metodología deductiva, con investigación bibliográfica en doctrina, Constitución Federal y legislación infraconstitucional.O presente artigo objetiva demonstrar as exceções à regra da publicidade dos atos processuais e administrativos prevista no Código de Processo Civil. Para tanto, descreve as hipóteses em que poderá ser conferido o segredo de justiça a um processo, ressaltando que as hipóteses estão restritas ao rol taxativo previsto no Código de Processo Civil, bem como procede-se com a análise do direito fundamental à publicidade dos atos processuais e administrativos bem como a sua intrínseca relação com os direito ao acesso à justiça, ao contraditório e à ampla defesa, descrevendo que as hipóteses de segredo de justiça não constituem afronta à Constituição Federal, na medida em que igualmente objetivam resguardar determinadas situações relacionadas ao direito à intimidade e vida privada das partes, sendo a razão de ser do referido rol taxativo previsto no diploma processual civil. Logo, concluiu-se que valendo-se de critérios de ponderação e pela análise do caso concreto, nem a hipótese de segredo de justiça, nem a regra da publicidade dos atos, constituem violação de direitos. Optou-se pela metodologia dedutiva, com pesquisas bibliográficas em doutrina, Constituição Federal e em legislação infraconstitucional.Research, Society and Development2021-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2157910.33448/rsd-v10i13.21579Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e426101321579Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e426101321579Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e4261013215792525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21579/19064Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandra Frei Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Alessandra Frei 2021-11-21T18:26:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21579Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:58.291450Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure El secreto de justicia y la publicidad de actos procesales y administrativos en el Código de Procedimiento Civil O segredo de justiça e a publicidade dos atos processuais e administrativos no Código de Processo Civil |
title |
The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure |
spellingShingle |
The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure Silva, Alessandra Frei Publicidad Secreto de juticia Proceso. Publicicy Secrecy of justice Process. Publicidade Segredo de justiça Processo. |
title_short |
The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure |
title_full |
The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure |
title_fullStr |
The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure |
title_full_unstemmed |
The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure |
title_sort |
The secrecy of justice and the publicity of procedural and administrative acts in the Code of Civil Procedure |
author |
Silva, Alessandra Frei |
author_facet |
Silva, Alessandra Frei |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Alessandra Frei |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Publicidad Secreto de juticia Proceso. Publicicy Secrecy of justice Process. Publicidade Segredo de justiça Processo. |
topic |
Publicidad Secreto de juticia Proceso. Publicicy Secrecy of justice Process. Publicidade Segredo de justiça Processo. |
description |
This article aims to demonstrate the exceptions to the rule of publicity of procedural and administrative acts provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure. For this purpose, it describes the hypotheses in which the secrecy of justice may be conferred on a process, noting that the hypotheses are restricted to the exhaustive list provided for the Code of Civil Procedure, as well as the analysis of the fundamental right to publicity of procedural and administrative acts, as well as its intrinsic relation with the right to access to justice, the adversary system and full defense, describing that the hypotheses of secrecy of justice do not constitute an affront to the Federal Constitution, insofar as they also aim to protect certain situations related to the right to intimacy and private life of the parties, being the reason for the aforementioned exhaustive list provided for in the civil procedural diploma. Therefore, it was concluded that using weighting criteria and the analysis of the concrete case, neither the hypothesis of secrecy of justice, nor the rule of publicity of the acts, constitutes a violation of rights. We opted for the deductive methodology, with bibliographical research in doctrine, Federal Constitution and infra-constitutional legislation. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21579 10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21579 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21579 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21579 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21579/19064 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandra Frei Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Alessandra Frei Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e426101321579 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e426101321579 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e426101321579 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052789777498112 |