Freedom of expression and its limits: a critical analysis of the civil mark of the internet

• Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Rosana Santos de
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Maciel, Jonatas Claudio Farias, Medeiros, Raquel Formiga de, Gadelha, Hugo Sarmento, Castro Filho, Hiran Mendes, Santos, Suzana Araujo dos, Marques, Agílio Tomaz, Silva, Matheus Matos Ferreira
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
• Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25445
• topic: Legislação; Privacidade; Provedor; Direito digital.; Legislation; Privacy; Provider; Digital right.; Legislación; Intimidad; Proveedor; Ley digital.

The internet translates as one of the greatest innovations of man during the 20th century, having in the last decades dispersed throughout the planet, besides introducing benefits to the knowledge and interaction between peoples, it has provided concern in the exposure of personal information; data policy; crimes and dissemination of untrue information. The changing society observes which measures would be ideal in the preservation of privacy and honor, and in guaranteeing freedom of expression, a fact that allowed the creation of legal mechanisms for regulation, such as the Marco Civil da Internet (2014). Therefore, the present research is based on the analysis of freedom of expression enshrined in the Federal Constitution and its relationship in the scope of the internet from the Civil Framework adopted in the country, thus describing the changes introduced and the theory of relativity of fundamental rights when in conflict between the principles. In view of this, the role of internet providers and the duties to be taken by them will be discussed, as well as accountability for non-compliance with the law. The research used the deductive method based on freedom of expression in social networks and the like, the historical procedure based on the evolution of the legislation and the monograph aimed at the study of the premises raised. There was a lack of legal means to punish criminal conduct, as well as the need for international legislation in view of the universality of the Internet and its numerous problems.