Evaluation of rapid descriptive sensory methods with different panels in the characteristics variations of beers packaged in distinct materials

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fronza, Pãmella
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Silva, Alessandro Rangel Carolino Sales, León, Marina Perbone, Vilaça, Alessandra Costa, Guirlanda, Christiano Pedro, Dutra, Victor Luiz Melo, Fante, Camila Argenta
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6137
Resumo: Two new rapid descriptive sensory evaluation methods have been gaining ground in the field sensory evaluation. The Projective Mapping method uses similarities and dissimilarities as a criterion, while Pivot Profile, uses reference criteria. This research aimed to assess panels with 12 and 24 judges, comparing its reproducibility, and evaluate if a non trained panel with a smaller numbers of judges is sufficient for results reliability. Samples of Pilsen beers in different packages were distributed, as well as a reference sample, with different sensorial characteristics. It was possible to observe a slight discrepancy between the results obtained in each of the applied tests. We observed a need for short-term training before the application of the test, aiming for better use of the descriptive terms by the judges. Also, the number of judges influenced the obtained results, being the panels of 24, in both tests, the ones that best described the indicated characteristics.
id UNIFEI_604194d26629cf4069f17093ae3b1a46
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6137
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of rapid descriptive sensory methods with different panels in the characteristics variations of beers packaged in distinct materialsEvaluación de métodos sensoriales rápidos descriptivos con diferentes paneles en las variaciones de características de las cervezas embaladas en diferentes envasesAvaliação de métodos sensoriais descritivos rápidos com diferentes painéis nas variações de características de cervejas envasadas em diferentes embalagensDescriptive analysisPivot profileProjective mapping.Análisis descriptivoPerfil pivoteMapping projection.Análise descritivaPerfil dinâmicoMapeamento projetivo.Two new rapid descriptive sensory evaluation methods have been gaining ground in the field sensory evaluation. The Projective Mapping method uses similarities and dissimilarities as a criterion, while Pivot Profile, uses reference criteria. This research aimed to assess panels with 12 and 24 judges, comparing its reproducibility, and evaluate if a non trained panel with a smaller numbers of judges is sufficient for results reliability. Samples of Pilsen beers in different packages were distributed, as well as a reference sample, with different sensorial characteristics. It was possible to observe a slight discrepancy between the results obtained in each of the applied tests. We observed a need for short-term training before the application of the test, aiming for better use of the descriptive terms by the judges. Also, the number of judges influenced the obtained results, being the panels of 24, in both tests, the ones that best described the indicated characteristics.Dos nuevos métodos de evaluación sensorial descriptiva rápida están ganando terreno en el campo del análisis sensorial. El método de Mapping Projection utiliza como criterio las similitudes y las disimilitudes, mientras que el Perfil Pivote, es un criterio de referencia. Este estudio tenía como objetivo evaluar paneles de 12 y 24 jueces, comparando su reproducibilidad, y verificar si un panel no capacitado con un número menor de jueces es suficiente para la fiabilidad de los resultados. Se distribuyeron muestras de cervezas Pilsen en diferentes paquetes, así como una muestra de referencia, con diferentes características sensoriales. Hubo un ligero desacuerdo entre los resultados obtenidos en cada una de las pruebas aplicadas. Era necesario un entrenamiento de corta duración antes de la aplicación de la prueba para un mejor uso de los términos descriptivos por parte de los evaluadores. Además, el número de evaluadores influyó en los resultados obtenidos, siendo los paneles de 24 evaluadores, en ambas pruebas, los que mejor describieron las características indicadas.Dois novos métodos de avaliação sensorial descritiva rápida vêm ganhando espaço no campo de análise sensorial. O método Projective Mapping utiliza similaridades e dissimilaridades como critério, ao passo que Pivot Profile, utiliza os critérios de referência. Este estudo objetivou avaliar painéis de 12 e 24 julgadores, comparando sua reprodutibilidade, e verificar se um painel não treinado com menor número de julgadores, é suficiente para a confiabilidade dos resultados. Amostras de cervejas pilsen em diferentes embalagens foram distribuídas, bem como uma amostra referência, com diferentes características sensoriais. Verificou-se uma leve discordância entre os resultados obtidos em cada um dos testes aplicados. Observou-se uma necessidade de treinamento de curta duração anterior à aplicação do teste para melhor utilização de termos descritivos pelos avaliadores. Além disso, o número de avaliadores influenciou os resultados obtidos, sendo que, os painéis de 24 julgadores, em ambos os testes, foram os que melhor descreveram as características indicadas.Research, Society and Development2020-08-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/613710.33448/rsd-v9i9.6137Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e08996137Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e08996137Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e089961372525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6137/6126Copyright (c) 2020 Pãmella Fronza, Alessandro Rangel Carolino Sales Silva, Marina Perbone León, Alessandra Costa Vilaça, Christiano Pedro Guirlanda, Victor Luiz Melo Dutra, Camila Argenta Fantehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFronza, PãmellaSilva, Alessandro Rangel Carolino SalesLeón, Marina PerboneVilaça, Alessandra CostaGuirlanda, Christiano PedroDutra, Victor Luiz MeloFante, Camila Argenta2020-09-18T01:42:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6137Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:29:23.575493Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of rapid descriptive sensory methods with different panels in the characteristics variations of beers packaged in distinct materials
Evaluación de métodos sensoriales rápidos descriptivos con diferentes paneles en las variaciones de características de las cervezas embaladas en diferentes envases
Avaliação de métodos sensoriais descritivos rápidos com diferentes painéis nas variações de características de cervejas envasadas em diferentes embalagens
title Evaluation of rapid descriptive sensory methods with different panels in the characteristics variations of beers packaged in distinct materials
spellingShingle Evaluation of rapid descriptive sensory methods with different panels in the characteristics variations of beers packaged in distinct materials
Fronza, Pãmella
Descriptive analysis
Pivot profile
Projective mapping.
Análisis descriptivo
Perfil pivote
Mapping projection.
Análise descritiva
Perfil dinâmico
Mapeamento projetivo.
title_short Evaluation of rapid descriptive sensory methods with different panels in the characteristics variations of beers packaged in distinct materials
title_full Evaluation of rapid descriptive sensory methods with different panels in the characteristics variations of beers packaged in distinct materials
title_fullStr Evaluation of rapid descriptive sensory methods with different panels in the characteristics variations of beers packaged in distinct materials
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of rapid descriptive sensory methods with different panels in the characteristics variations of beers packaged in distinct materials
title_sort Evaluation of rapid descriptive sensory methods with different panels in the characteristics variations of beers packaged in distinct materials
author Fronza, Pãmella
author_facet Fronza, Pãmella
Silva, Alessandro Rangel Carolino Sales
León, Marina Perbone
Vilaça, Alessandra Costa
Guirlanda, Christiano Pedro
Dutra, Victor Luiz Melo
Fante, Camila Argenta
author_role author
author2 Silva, Alessandro Rangel Carolino Sales
León, Marina Perbone
Vilaça, Alessandra Costa
Guirlanda, Christiano Pedro
Dutra, Victor Luiz Melo
Fante, Camila Argenta
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fronza, Pãmella
Silva, Alessandro Rangel Carolino Sales
León, Marina Perbone
Vilaça, Alessandra Costa
Guirlanda, Christiano Pedro
Dutra, Victor Luiz Melo
Fante, Camila Argenta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Descriptive analysis
Pivot profile
Projective mapping.
Análisis descriptivo
Perfil pivote
Mapping projection.
Análise descritiva
Perfil dinâmico
Mapeamento projetivo.
topic Descriptive analysis
Pivot profile
Projective mapping.
Análisis descriptivo
Perfil pivote
Mapping projection.
Análise descritiva
Perfil dinâmico
Mapeamento projetivo.
description Two new rapid descriptive sensory evaluation methods have been gaining ground in the field sensory evaluation. The Projective Mapping method uses similarities and dissimilarities as a criterion, while Pivot Profile, uses reference criteria. This research aimed to assess panels with 12 and 24 judges, comparing its reproducibility, and evaluate if a non trained panel with a smaller numbers of judges is sufficient for results reliability. Samples of Pilsen beers in different packages were distributed, as well as a reference sample, with different sensorial characteristics. It was possible to observe a slight discrepancy between the results obtained in each of the applied tests. We observed a need for short-term training before the application of the test, aiming for better use of the descriptive terms by the judges. Also, the number of judges influenced the obtained results, being the panels of 24, in both tests, the ones that best described the indicated characteristics.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6137
10.33448/rsd-v9i9.6137
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6137
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i9.6137
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/6137/6126
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 9; e08996137
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 9; e08996137
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 9; e08996137
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052779289640960

Registros relacionados