Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha, Isaias Pinheiro da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Rodrigues Junior, Omero Martins
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23460
Resumo: The laboratory diagnosis of ascariasis is done through the Parasitological Examination of Feces (EPF), which investigates the presence of Ascaris lumbricoides eggs in the feces. The Hoffman Method is based on spontaneous sedimentation and allows the concentration of eggs, cysts, oocysts and larvae of numerous species through gravitational sedimentation of a fecal sample. And the Direct Fresh Examination allows the identification of protozoa (trophozoites and cysts) and helminths (eggs, larvae and small adults). Objective: To compare the sensitivity of direct-fresh and Hoffman laboratory methods in the field of Parasitology. Methodology: The search for scientific articles was performed in electronic databases: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Latin American Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health (Pubmed). Publications from 2015 to 2021, in Portuguese, Spanish and English. Results and Discussion: Direct fresh examination and the technique of Hoffman, Pons and Janer or Lutz (HPJL) are the most used laboratory methods, as these techniques have as main advantage the minimal need for materials and financial resources. However, the disadvantage is that there is a large amount of fecal debris in the sediment, making preparation and microscopic examination difficult. Final Considerations: Fresh Direct and Hofmman, when used together, increase the probability of real and reliable diagnoses, especially in the diagnosis of helminth eggs and cysts, but separated, each has greater sensitivity in specific cases. Due to the scarcity of comparative studies of these two methods, it is evident and worth suggesting further research in this regard, since these methods are so important in the diagnosis of parasitic diseases, which have become a public health issue, but due to the difficult diagnosis it ends up being neglected in our day to day.
id UNIFEI_621406f40a8adad5c8313db7235c4d45
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23460
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris LumbricoidesEvaluación de sensibilidad de métodos frescos directos y de Hoffman para Ascaris LumbricoidesAvaliação da sensibilidade dos métodos direto à fresco e Hoffman para Ascaris LumbricoidesDireto a frescoHoffmanSedimentação espontâneaSensibilidade. Straight to freshHoffmanSpontaneous sedimentationSensitivity. Directo a frescoHoffmanSedimentación espontáneaSensibilidad.The laboratory diagnosis of ascariasis is done through the Parasitological Examination of Feces (EPF), which investigates the presence of Ascaris lumbricoides eggs in the feces. The Hoffman Method is based on spontaneous sedimentation and allows the concentration of eggs, cysts, oocysts and larvae of numerous species through gravitational sedimentation of a fecal sample. And the Direct Fresh Examination allows the identification of protozoa (trophozoites and cysts) and helminths (eggs, larvae and small adults). Objective: To compare the sensitivity of direct-fresh and Hoffman laboratory methods in the field of Parasitology. Methodology: The search for scientific articles was performed in electronic databases: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Latin American Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health (Pubmed). Publications from 2015 to 2021, in Portuguese, Spanish and English. Results and Discussion: Direct fresh examination and the technique of Hoffman, Pons and Janer or Lutz (HPJL) are the most used laboratory methods, as these techniques have as main advantage the minimal need for materials and financial resources. However, the disadvantage is that there is a large amount of fecal debris in the sediment, making preparation and microscopic examination difficult. Final Considerations: Fresh Direct and Hofmman, when used together, increase the probability of real and reliable diagnoses, especially in the diagnosis of helminth eggs and cysts, but separated, each has greater sensitivity in specific cases. Due to the scarcity of comparative studies of these two methods, it is evident and worth suggesting further research in this regard, since these methods are so important in the diagnosis of parasitic diseases, which have become a public health issue, but due to the difficult diagnosis it ends up being neglected in our day to day.El diagnóstico de laboratorio de ascariasis se realiza a través del Examen Parasitológico de Heces (EPF), que investiga la presencia de huevos de Ascaris lumbricoides en las heces. El Método Hoffman se basa en la sedimentación espontánea y permite la concentración de huevos, quistes, ooquistes y larvas de numerosas especies mediante la sedimentación gravitacional de una muestra fecal. Y el examen directo en fresco permite la identificación de protozoos (trofozoítos y quistes) y helmintos (huevos, larvas y pequeños adultos). Objetivo: Comparar la sensibilidad de los métodos de laboratorio de fresco directo y Hoffman en el campo de la parasitología. Metodología: La búsqueda de artículos científicos se realizó en bases de datos electrónicas: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Literatura Latinoamericana en Ciencias de la Salud (LILACS), Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina e Instituto Nacional de Salud (Pubmed). Publicaciones de 2015 a 2021, en portugués, español e inglés. Resultados y Discusión: El examen fresco directo y la técnica de Hoffman, Pons y Janer o Lutz (HPJL) son los métodos de laboratorio más utilizados, ya que estas técnicas tienen como principal ventaja la mínima necesidad de materiales y recursos económicos. Sin embargo, la desventaja es que hay una gran cantidad de desechos fecales en el sedimento, lo que dificulta la preparación y el examen microscópico. Consideraciones finales: Fresh Direct y Hofmman, cuando se usan juntos, aumentan la probabilidad de diagnósticos reales y confiables, especialmente en el diagnóstico de huevos y quistes de helmintos, pero separados, cada uno tiene mayor sensibilidad en casos específicos. Debido a la escasez de estudios comparativos de estos dos métodos, es evidente y vale la pena sugerir una mayor investigación al respecto, ya que estos métodos son tan importantes en el diagnóstico de enfermedades parasitarias, que se han convertido en un problema de salud pública, pero debido a la dificultad. diagnóstico termina siendo descuidado en nuestro día a día.O diagnóstico laboratorial da ascaridíase se dá através do Exame Parasitológico de Fezes (EPF), onde é pesquisado a presença de ovos do Ascaris lumbricoides nas fezes. O Método Hoffman se fundamenta na sedimentação espontânea e permite a concentração de ovos, cistos, oocistos e larvas de inúmeras espécies por meio de uma sedimentação gravitacional de uma amostra fecal. E o Exame Direto a Fresco, permite a identificação de protozoários (trofozoítas e cistos) e de helmintos (ovos, larvas e pequenos adultos). Objetivo: Comparar a sensibilidade dos métodos laboratoriais direto a fresco e de Hoffman na área de Parasitologia. Metodologia: A busca de artigos científicos foi realizada nas bases de dados eletrônicas: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Literatura Latino-Americana em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health (Pubmed). Publicações de 2015 a 2021, em idiomas português, espanhol e inglês. Resultados e Discussão: O exame direto a fresco e a técnica de Hoffman, Pons e Janer ou Lutz (HPJL) são os métodos laboratoriais mais utilizados, pois estas técnicas têm como principal vantagem a necessidade mínima de materiais e recursos financeiros. Porém a desvantagem é de apresentar uma grande quantidade de detritos fecais no sedimento, dificultando a preparação e o exame microscópico. Considerações Finais: Direto a fresco e Hofmman, quando utilizados em conjunto aumentam as probabilidades de diagnósticos reais e confiáveis, principalmente no diagnóstico de ovos e cistos de helmintos, porém separados cada um possui maior sensibilidade em casos específicos. Pela escassez de estudos comparativos destes dois métodos, fica evidente e vale a sugestão de mais pesquisas nesse sentido, uma vez que estes métodos se apresentam tão importantes no diagnóstico das parasitoses, que têm se tornado uma questão de saúde pública, porém pelo difícil diagnóstico acaba sendo negligenciada no nosso dia a dia.Research, Society and Development2021-11-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2346010.33448/rsd-v10i15.23460Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 15; e496101523460Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 15; e496101523460Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 15; e4961015234602525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23460/20293Copyright (c) 2021 Isaias Pinheiro da Cunha; Omero Martins Rodrigues Juniorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha, Isaias Pinheiro da Rodrigues Junior, Omero Martins 2021-12-06T10:13:53Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23460Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:42:19.450176Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides
Evaluación de sensibilidad de métodos frescos directos y de Hoffman para Ascaris Lumbricoides
Avaliação da sensibilidade dos métodos direto à fresco e Hoffman para Ascaris Lumbricoides
title Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides
spellingShingle Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides
Cunha, Isaias Pinheiro da
Direto a fresco
Hoffman
Sedimentação espontânea
Sensibilidade.
Straight to fresh
Hoffman
Spontaneous sedimentation
Sensitivity.
Directo a fresco
Hoffman
Sedimentación espontánea
Sensibilidad.
title_short Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides
title_full Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides
title_fullStr Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides
title_sort Sensitivity evaluation of direct fresh and Hoffman methods for Ascaris Lumbricoides
author Cunha, Isaias Pinheiro da
author_facet Cunha, Isaias Pinheiro da
Rodrigues Junior, Omero Martins
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues Junior, Omero Martins
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha, Isaias Pinheiro da
Rodrigues Junior, Omero Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direto a fresco
Hoffman
Sedimentação espontânea
Sensibilidade.
Straight to fresh
Hoffman
Spontaneous sedimentation
Sensitivity.
Directo a fresco
Hoffman
Sedimentación espontánea
Sensibilidad.
topic Direto a fresco
Hoffman
Sedimentação espontânea
Sensibilidade.
Straight to fresh
Hoffman
Spontaneous sedimentation
Sensitivity.
Directo a fresco
Hoffman
Sedimentación espontánea
Sensibilidad.
description The laboratory diagnosis of ascariasis is done through the Parasitological Examination of Feces (EPF), which investigates the presence of Ascaris lumbricoides eggs in the feces. The Hoffman Method is based on spontaneous sedimentation and allows the concentration of eggs, cysts, oocysts and larvae of numerous species through gravitational sedimentation of a fecal sample. And the Direct Fresh Examination allows the identification of protozoa (trophozoites and cysts) and helminths (eggs, larvae and small adults). Objective: To compare the sensitivity of direct-fresh and Hoffman laboratory methods in the field of Parasitology. Methodology: The search for scientific articles was performed in electronic databases: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO), Latin American Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), National Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health (Pubmed). Publications from 2015 to 2021, in Portuguese, Spanish and English. Results and Discussion: Direct fresh examination and the technique of Hoffman, Pons and Janer or Lutz (HPJL) are the most used laboratory methods, as these techniques have as main advantage the minimal need for materials and financial resources. However, the disadvantage is that there is a large amount of fecal debris in the sediment, making preparation and microscopic examination difficult. Final Considerations: Fresh Direct and Hofmman, when used together, increase the probability of real and reliable diagnoses, especially in the diagnosis of helminth eggs and cysts, but separated, each has greater sensitivity in specific cases. Due to the scarcity of comparative studies of these two methods, it is evident and worth suggesting further research in this regard, since these methods are so important in the diagnosis of parasitic diseases, which have become a public health issue, but due to the difficult diagnosis it ends up being neglected in our day to day.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23460
10.33448/rsd-v10i15.23460
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23460
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i15.23460
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/23460/20293
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Isaias Pinheiro da Cunha; Omero Martins Rodrigues Junior
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Isaias Pinheiro da Cunha; Omero Martins Rodrigues Junior
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 15; e496101523460
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 15; e496101523460
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 15; e496101523460
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052697966280704