Legal analysis of the determination of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32198 |
Resumo: | The possibility of applying the theory of the loss of a chance of cure or survival has been a recurring theme in cases in which medical civil liability is discussed. Especially with regard to the evidentiary phase, the problematization is permeated in the presumptive judicial decisions, averse to the fulfillment of the substantial contradictory and procedural cooperation, culminating in the use of evidence with a non-coherent and adequate argumentative construction of medical guilt and the causal link between medical conduct and the harmful event. As a hypothesis of the stir, it is understood that the application of the requirements established by the Superior Court of Justice are an indispensable part of the theme decidendum. This study aims, in this line, to demonstrate the outstanding evidentiary procedural elements in the context of the verification of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field, as well as to analyze to what extent the judge could use presumptive reasoning to conclude for the application of the theory in the medical field. Through a deductive analysis using national and international specialized doctrine on the subject, in addition to citing specific legislation, jurisprudence and principles of law, its application in the particular case is identified. Also, the logical and systematic methods will be used, with the demonstration of cases already decided by the national courts. |
id |
UNIFEI_69d9886fb199e8c9fa50b2091194083a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32198 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Legal analysis of the determination of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical fieldAnálisis jurídico de la determinación de la teoría de la pérdida de oportunidad en el campo médicoAnálise jurídica da apuração da teoria da perda de uma chance na área médicaProbationary phase of the loss of a chancePresumptive judicial reasoningRequirements of the Superior Court of JusticeMedical civil liability.Fase probatoria de la pérdida de una oportunidadeRazonamiento judicial presuntivoRequerimientos de la Corte Superior de JusticiaResponsabilidad civil médica.Fase probatória da perda de uma chanceRaciocínio judicial presuntivoRequisitos do Superior Tribunal de JustiçaResponsabilidade civil médica.The possibility of applying the theory of the loss of a chance of cure or survival has been a recurring theme in cases in which medical civil liability is discussed. Especially with regard to the evidentiary phase, the problematization is permeated in the presumptive judicial decisions, averse to the fulfillment of the substantial contradictory and procedural cooperation, culminating in the use of evidence with a non-coherent and adequate argumentative construction of medical guilt and the causal link between medical conduct and the harmful event. As a hypothesis of the stir, it is understood that the application of the requirements established by the Superior Court of Justice are an indispensable part of the theme decidendum. This study aims, in this line, to demonstrate the outstanding evidentiary procedural elements in the context of the verification of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field, as well as to analyze to what extent the judge could use presumptive reasoning to conclude for the application of the theory in the medical field. Through a deductive analysis using national and international specialized doctrine on the subject, in addition to citing specific legislation, jurisprudence and principles of law, its application in the particular case is identified. Also, the logical and systematic methods will be used, with the demonstration of cases already decided by the national courts.La posibilidad de aplicar la teoría de la pérdida de la posibilidad de curación o supervivencia ha sido un tema recurrente en los casos en los que se discute la responsabilidad civil médica. Especialmente en lo que se refiere a la fase probatoria, la problematización está permeada en las decisiones judiciales presuntivas, adversas al cumplimiento de la sustancial contradicción y cooperación procesal, culminando en el uso de la prueba con una construcción argumentativa no coherente y adecuada de la culpabilidad médica y la nexo de causalidad entre la conducta médica y el hecho nocivo. Como hipótesis del revuelo, se entiende que la aplicación de los requisitos establecidos por la Corte Superior de Justicia son parte indispensable del tema decidendum. Este estudio pretende, en esta línea, demostrar los elementos procesales probatorios sobresalientes en el contexto de la verificación de la teoría de la pérdida de oportunidad en el área médica, así como analizar en qué medida el juez podría utilizar el razonamiento presuntivo para concluir para la aplicación de la teoría en el campo médico. A través de un análisis deductivo utilizando la doctrina especializada nacional e internacional en la materia, además de citar legislación, jurisprudencia y principios de derecho específicos, se identifica su aplicación en el caso particular. Asimismo, se utilizarán los métodos lógicos y sistemáticos, con la demostración de casos ya decididos por los tribunales nacionales.A possibilidade de aplicação da teoria da perda de uma chance de cura ou sobrevivência tem sido tema recorrente nos processos em que se discute a responsabilidade civil médica. Sobretudo no que se refere à fase probatória, a problematização se perpassa nas decisões judiciais presuntivas, avessas ao cumprimento do contraditório substancial e da cooperação processual, culminando na utilização da prova com uma construção argumentativa não coerente e adequada da culpa médica e do nexo de causalidade entre a conduta médica e o evento danoso. Como hipótese da celeuma, entende-se que a aplicação dos requisitos estabelecidos pelo Superior Tribunal de Justiça são parte indispensável do thema decidendum. Este estudo objetiva, nessa linha, demonstrar os elementos processuais probatórios de destaque no contexto da verificação da teoria da perda de uma chance na área médica, assim como analisar em que medida poderia o juiz utilizar-se de raciocínio presuntivo para concluir pela aplicação da teoria na área médica. Por meio de uma análise dedutiva utilizando-se de doutrina especializada nacional e internacional acerca do tema, além da citação de legislação específica, jurisprudência e princípios de direito, identifique-se sua aplicação no caso particular. Ainda, serão utilizados os métodos lógico e sistemático, com a demonstração de casos já decididos pelos tribunais pátrios.Research, Society and Development2022-07-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3219810.33448/rsd-v11i9.32198Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 9; e46111932198Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 9; e46111932198Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 9; e461119321982525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32198/27311Copyright (c) 2022 Lais Silva Zimiani; Fabio Caldas de Araújo; Kelly Cardosohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZimiani, Lais Silva Araújo, Fabio Caldas de Cardoso, Kelly2022-07-21T12:36:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32198Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:48:16.517576Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Legal analysis of the determination of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field Análisis jurídico de la determinación de la teoría de la pérdida de oportunidad en el campo médico Análise jurídica da apuração da teoria da perda de uma chance na área médica |
title |
Legal analysis of the determination of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field |
spellingShingle |
Legal analysis of the determination of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field Zimiani, Lais Silva Probationary phase of the loss of a chance Presumptive judicial reasoning Requirements of the Superior Court of Justice Medical civil liability. Fase probatoria de la pérdida de una oportunidade Razonamiento judicial presuntivo Requerimientos de la Corte Superior de Justicia Responsabilidad civil médica. Fase probatória da perda de uma chance Raciocínio judicial presuntivo Requisitos do Superior Tribunal de Justiça Responsabilidade civil médica. |
title_short |
Legal analysis of the determination of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field |
title_full |
Legal analysis of the determination of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field |
title_fullStr |
Legal analysis of the determination of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field |
title_full_unstemmed |
Legal analysis of the determination of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field |
title_sort |
Legal analysis of the determination of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field |
author |
Zimiani, Lais Silva |
author_facet |
Zimiani, Lais Silva Araújo, Fabio Caldas de Cardoso, Kelly |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Araújo, Fabio Caldas de Cardoso, Kelly |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zimiani, Lais Silva Araújo, Fabio Caldas de Cardoso, Kelly |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Probationary phase of the loss of a chance Presumptive judicial reasoning Requirements of the Superior Court of Justice Medical civil liability. Fase probatoria de la pérdida de una oportunidade Razonamiento judicial presuntivo Requerimientos de la Corte Superior de Justicia Responsabilidad civil médica. Fase probatória da perda de uma chance Raciocínio judicial presuntivo Requisitos do Superior Tribunal de Justiça Responsabilidade civil médica. |
topic |
Probationary phase of the loss of a chance Presumptive judicial reasoning Requirements of the Superior Court of Justice Medical civil liability. Fase probatoria de la pérdida de una oportunidade Razonamiento judicial presuntivo Requerimientos de la Corte Superior de Justicia Responsabilidad civil médica. Fase probatória da perda de uma chance Raciocínio judicial presuntivo Requisitos do Superior Tribunal de Justiça Responsabilidade civil médica. |
description |
The possibility of applying the theory of the loss of a chance of cure or survival has been a recurring theme in cases in which medical civil liability is discussed. Especially with regard to the evidentiary phase, the problematization is permeated in the presumptive judicial decisions, averse to the fulfillment of the substantial contradictory and procedural cooperation, culminating in the use of evidence with a non-coherent and adequate argumentative construction of medical guilt and the causal link between medical conduct and the harmful event. As a hypothesis of the stir, it is understood that the application of the requirements established by the Superior Court of Justice are an indispensable part of the theme decidendum. This study aims, in this line, to demonstrate the outstanding evidentiary procedural elements in the context of the verification of the theory of loss of a chance in the medical field, as well as to analyze to what extent the judge could use presumptive reasoning to conclude for the application of the theory in the medical field. Through a deductive analysis using national and international specialized doctrine on the subject, in addition to citing specific legislation, jurisprudence and principles of law, its application in the particular case is identified. Also, the logical and systematic methods will be used, with the demonstration of cases already decided by the national courts. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32198 10.33448/rsd-v11i9.32198 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32198 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i9.32198 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32198/27311 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Lais Silva Zimiani; Fabio Caldas de Araújo; Kelly Cardoso https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Lais Silva Zimiani; Fabio Caldas de Araújo; Kelly Cardoso https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 9; e46111932198 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 9; e46111932198 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 9; e46111932198 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052769164591104 |