An approach on resources and incentives for innovation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26399 |
Resumo: | Aim: This paper seeks, through a descriptive quantitative research, to present a comparison between companies that innovated and companies that used financial resources available for this purpose and justify the divergence between the indicators. Methods: This descriptive quantitative research carried out a survey of secondary data made available by IBGE on PINTEC results between 2014 and 2017 and BNDES disbursement data for the same time interval. In possession of the data, filters were applied to segment data of operations with credits classified as innovation, then the percentage was calculated to understand the degree of use of available resources for innovation. Results: The results found indicated that 33.6% of the surveyed companies were innovative in products or processes, data that indicates a reduction in relation to the previous two trienniums. Among these companies, most (89%) used their own resources for the development of activities. Conclusion: We can see a difference in the types of support declared by the indicators and the difficulties pointed out by companies for the implementation of innovation. |
id |
UNIFEI_6b091829cb781427f10c1f22e00d1186 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26399 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
An approach on resources and incentives for innovationUn enfoque sobre los recursos e incentivos para la innovaciónUma abordagem sobre os recursos e incentivos para inovaçãoRecursos para inovaçãoIncentivos para inovaçãoDesembolso com inovação.Recursos para la innovaciónIncentivos para la innovaciónDesembolsos para la innovación.Resources for innovationIncentives for innovationInnovation disbursements.Aim: This paper seeks, through a descriptive quantitative research, to present a comparison between companies that innovated and companies that used financial resources available for this purpose and justify the divergence between the indicators. Methods: This descriptive quantitative research carried out a survey of secondary data made available by IBGE on PINTEC results between 2014 and 2017 and BNDES disbursement data for the same time interval. In possession of the data, filters were applied to segment data of operations with credits classified as innovation, then the percentage was calculated to understand the degree of use of available resources for innovation. Results: The results found indicated that 33.6% of the surveyed companies were innovative in products or processes, data that indicates a reduction in relation to the previous two trienniums. Among these companies, most (89%) used their own resources for the development of activities. Conclusion: We can see a difference in the types of support declared by the indicators and the difficulties pointed out by companies for the implementation of innovation.Objetivo: Este trabajo pretende, a través de una investigación cuantitativa descriptiva, presentar una comparación entre las empresas que innovaron y las que utilizaron los recursos financieros disponibles para ello y justificar la divergencia entre los indicadores. Métodos: Esta investigación cuantitativa descriptiva realizó un estudio de datos secundarios puestos a disposición por el IBGE sobre los resultados del PINTEC entre 2014 y 2017 y los datos de desembolso del BNDES para el mismo intervalo de tiempo. En posesión de los datos, se aplicaron filtros para segmentar los datos de las operaciones con créditos clasificados como innovación, y luego se calculó el porcentaje para conocer el grado de utilización de los recursos disponibles para la innovación. Resultados: Los resultados encontrados indican que el 33,6% de las empresas encuestadas son innovadoras en productos o procesos, dato que indica una reducción en relación a los dos trienios anteriores. Entre estas empresas, la mayoría (89%) utilizó recursos propios para el desarrollo de las actividades. Conclusión: Se observa una diferencia en las indicaciones de los tipos de apoyo declarados por los indicadores y las dificultades señaladas por las empresas para la implementación de la innovación.Objetivo: Este trabalho busca através de uma pesquisa quantitativa descritiva, apresentar um comparativo entre empresas que inovaram e empresas que utilizaram recursos financeiros disponíveis para tal e justificar a divergência entre os indicadores. Métodos: Esta pesquisa quantitativa descritiva realizou o levantamento de dados secundários disponibilizados pelo IBGE nos resultados PINTEC entre 2014 e 2017 e dos dados de desembolso do BNDES para o mesmo intervalo temporal. De posse dos dados, filtros foram aplicados para segmentar dados de operações com créditos classificados como inovação, em seguida calculou-se o percentual para compreender o grau de utilização dos recursos disponíveis para inovação. Resultados: Os resultados encontrados indicaram que 33,6% das empresas pesquisadas foram inovadoras em produtos ou processos, dados que indicam uma redução em relação aos dois triênios anteriores. Dentre essas empresas, a maioria (89%) utilizou recursos próprios para o desenvolvimento das atividades. Conclusão: Pode-se constatar uma diferença nos apontamentos dos tipos de apoios declarados pelos indicadores e as dificuldades apontadas pelas empresas para a implementação de inovação.Research, Society and Development2022-02-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2639910.33448/rsd-v11i3.26399Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 3; e22411326399Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 3; e22411326399Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 3; e224113263992525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26399/23177Copyright (c) 2022 Edson Lauro Marchini; José Roberto Dias Pereirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarchini, Edson LauroPereira, José Roberto Dias2022-03-09T13:44:38Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/26399Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2022-03-09T13:44:38Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
An approach on resources and incentives for innovation Un enfoque sobre los recursos e incentivos para la innovación Uma abordagem sobre os recursos e incentivos para inovação |
title |
An approach on resources and incentives for innovation |
spellingShingle |
An approach on resources and incentives for innovation Marchini, Edson Lauro Recursos para inovação Incentivos para inovação Desembolso com inovação. Recursos para la innovación Incentivos para la innovación Desembolsos para la innovación. Resources for innovation Incentives for innovation Innovation disbursements. |
title_short |
An approach on resources and incentives for innovation |
title_full |
An approach on resources and incentives for innovation |
title_fullStr |
An approach on resources and incentives for innovation |
title_full_unstemmed |
An approach on resources and incentives for innovation |
title_sort |
An approach on resources and incentives for innovation |
author |
Marchini, Edson Lauro |
author_facet |
Marchini, Edson Lauro Pereira, José Roberto Dias |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, José Roberto Dias |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marchini, Edson Lauro Pereira, José Roberto Dias |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Recursos para inovação Incentivos para inovação Desembolso com inovação. Recursos para la innovación Incentivos para la innovación Desembolsos para la innovación. Resources for innovation Incentives for innovation Innovation disbursements. |
topic |
Recursos para inovação Incentivos para inovação Desembolso com inovação. Recursos para la innovación Incentivos para la innovación Desembolsos para la innovación. Resources for innovation Incentives for innovation Innovation disbursements. |
description |
Aim: This paper seeks, through a descriptive quantitative research, to present a comparison between companies that innovated and companies that used financial resources available for this purpose and justify the divergence between the indicators. Methods: This descriptive quantitative research carried out a survey of secondary data made available by IBGE on PINTEC results between 2014 and 2017 and BNDES disbursement data for the same time interval. In possession of the data, filters were applied to segment data of operations with credits classified as innovation, then the percentage was calculated to understand the degree of use of available resources for innovation. Results: The results found indicated that 33.6% of the surveyed companies were innovative in products or processes, data that indicates a reduction in relation to the previous two trienniums. Among these companies, most (89%) used their own resources for the development of activities. Conclusion: We can see a difference in the types of support declared by the indicators and the difficulties pointed out by companies for the implementation of innovation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26399 10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26399 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26399 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i3.26399 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/26399/23177 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Edson Lauro Marchini; José Roberto Dias Pereira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Edson Lauro Marchini; José Roberto Dias Pereira https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 3; e22411326399 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 3; e22411326399 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 3; e22411326399 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1782102980730814464 |