Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fialho, Micheli Fontes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio, Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27885
Resumo: Pernambuco has a relevant part of the population that survives from family farming and a substantial portion of this contingent lives in very dry areas. In this scenario, Pronaf, emerges as an important instrument for the poorest groups, especially in the Northeast. In this perspective, the purpose of this article was to analyze how the resources of the Program were distributed among the municipalities of Pernambuco, considering the division of the territory into Development Regions (DR), in the period from 2013 to 2018. For this, we used indexes of Gini, T of Theil and Concentration, making it possible to understand to what extent the distribution of resources was correlated with the importance of these municipalities in state family farming, in terms of number of establishments, area, employed people and production value. As a result, it was found that costing contracts were more unequal and concentrated than investment contracts. As for the variables analyzed, it was observed that they did not reflect the relative importance of the municipalities in family farming and proved to be little dissonant, mainly in relation to the value of production (for funding), demonstrating a greater relationship between these indicators and the distribution of financing.
id UNIFEI_6ef4a9eb333db0695bb5ba1535c840ba
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27885
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Pronaf intraregional inequalities in PernambucoLas desigualdades intrarregionales del Pronaf en PernambucoAs desigualdades intrarregionais do Pronaf em Pernambuco Family farmingPronafPernambucoIntraregional inequality.Agricultura familiarPronafPernambucoDesigualdad intrarregional.Agricultura familiarPronafPernambucoDesigualdade intrarregional.Pernambuco has a relevant part of the population that survives from family farming and a substantial portion of this contingent lives in very dry areas. In this scenario, Pronaf, emerges as an important instrument for the poorest groups, especially in the Northeast. In this perspective, the purpose of this article was to analyze how the resources of the Program were distributed among the municipalities of Pernambuco, considering the division of the territory into Development Regions (DR), in the period from 2013 to 2018. For this, we used indexes of Gini, T of Theil and Concentration, making it possible to understand to what extent the distribution of resources was correlated with the importance of these municipalities in state family farming, in terms of number of establishments, area, employed people and production value. As a result, it was found that costing contracts were more unequal and concentrated than investment contracts. As for the variables analyzed, it was observed that they did not reflect the relative importance of the municipalities in family farming and proved to be little dissonant, mainly in relation to the value of production (for funding), demonstrating a greater relationship between these indicators and the distribution of financing.Pernambuco tiene una parte relevante de la población que sobrevive de la agricultura familiar y una parte sustancial de este contingente habita en zonas muy secas. El Pronaf, en ese escenario, emerge como un instrumento importante para los grupos más pobres, principalmente en el Nordeste. En esa perspectiva, el objetivo de este artículo fue analizar cómo los recursos del Programa fueron distribuidos entre los municipios de Pernambuco, frente a la división del territorio en Regiones de Desarrollo (RD), en el período de 2013 a 2018. Para ello, se utilizaron índices de Gini, T de Theil e de Concentración, lo que permitió comprender en qué medida la distribución de los recursos se correlacionó con la importancia de estos municipios en la agricultura familiar estatal, en términos de número de establecimientos, superficie, personas ocupadas y valor de la producción. Como resultado, se encontró que los contratos de financiamiento eran más desiguales y concentrados que los contratos de inversión. En cuanto a las variables analizadas, se observó que no reflejaban la importancia relativa de los municipios en la agricultura familiar y no eran muy diferentes, especialmente en relación al valor de la producción (para financiamiento), demostrando una mayor relación entre este indicador y el distribución de recursos.Pernambuco possui parte relevante da população que sobrevive da agricultura familiar e parcela substancial desse contingente habita áreas bastante secas. O Pronaf, neste cenário, emerge como um instrumento importante aos grupos mais pobres, principalmente no Nordeste. Nessa perspectiva, o objetivo deste artigo foi analisar como os recursos do Programa foram distribuídos entre os municípios pernambucanos, tendo em vista a divisão do território em Regiões de Desenvolvimento (RD), no período de 2013 a 2018.  Para isso, utilizou-se índices de Gini, T de Theil e de Concentração, possibilitando compreender em que medida a distribuição dos recursos se correlacionou com a importância desses municípios na agricultura familiar estadual, em termos de número de estabelecimentos, área, pessoal ocupado e valor da produção. Como resultados, verificou-se que os contratos de custeio foram mais desiguais e concentrados que os de investimento. Quanto às variáveis analisadas, observou-se que não refletiram a importância relativa dos municípios na agricultura familiar e se mostraram pouco destoantes, principalmente em relação ao valor da produção (para custeio), demonstrando uma relação maior entre esse indicador e a repartição dos financiamentos.Research, Society and Development2022-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2788510.33448/rsd-v11i4.27885Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e59911427885Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e59911427885Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e599114278852525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27885/24253Copyright (c) 2022 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFialho, Micheli FontesFerreira Neto, José Ambrósio Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos2022-03-27T17:17:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27885Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:45:28.396875Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco
Las desigualdades intrarregionales del Pronaf en Pernambuco
As desigualdades intrarregionais do Pronaf em Pernambuco
title Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco
spellingShingle Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco
Fialho, Micheli Fontes
Family farming
Pronaf
Pernambuco
Intraregional inequality.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Pernambuco
Desigualdad intrarregional.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Pernambuco
Desigualdade intrarregional.
title_short Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco
title_full Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco
title_fullStr Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco
title_full_unstemmed Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco
title_sort Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco
author Fialho, Micheli Fontes
author_facet Fialho, Micheli Fontes
Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio
Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos
author_role author
author2 Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio
Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fialho, Micheli Fontes
Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio
Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Family farming
Pronaf
Pernambuco
Intraregional inequality.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Pernambuco
Desigualdad intrarregional.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Pernambuco
Desigualdade intrarregional.
topic Family farming
Pronaf
Pernambuco
Intraregional inequality.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Pernambuco
Desigualdad intrarregional.
Agricultura familiar
Pronaf
Pernambuco
Desigualdade intrarregional.
description Pernambuco has a relevant part of the population that survives from family farming and a substantial portion of this contingent lives in very dry areas. In this scenario, Pronaf, emerges as an important instrument for the poorest groups, especially in the Northeast. In this perspective, the purpose of this article was to analyze how the resources of the Program were distributed among the municipalities of Pernambuco, considering the division of the territory into Development Regions (DR), in the period from 2013 to 2018. For this, we used indexes of Gini, T of Theil and Concentration, making it possible to understand to what extent the distribution of resources was correlated with the importance of these municipalities in state family farming, in terms of number of establishments, area, employed people and production value. As a result, it was found that costing contracts were more unequal and concentrated than investment contracts. As for the variables analyzed, it was observed that they did not reflect the relative importance of the municipalities in family farming and proved to be little dissonant, mainly in relation to the value of production (for funding), demonstrating a greater relationship between these indicators and the distribution of financing.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27885
10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27885
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27885
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27885
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27885/24253
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e59911427885
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e59911427885
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e59911427885
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052708453089280