Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27885 |
Resumo: | Pernambuco has a relevant part of the population that survives from family farming and a substantial portion of this contingent lives in very dry areas. In this scenario, Pronaf, emerges as an important instrument for the poorest groups, especially in the Northeast. In this perspective, the purpose of this article was to analyze how the resources of the Program were distributed among the municipalities of Pernambuco, considering the division of the territory into Development Regions (DR), in the period from 2013 to 2018. For this, we used indexes of Gini, T of Theil and Concentration, making it possible to understand to what extent the distribution of resources was correlated with the importance of these municipalities in state family farming, in terms of number of establishments, area, employed people and production value. As a result, it was found that costing contracts were more unequal and concentrated than investment contracts. As for the variables analyzed, it was observed that they did not reflect the relative importance of the municipalities in family farming and proved to be little dissonant, mainly in relation to the value of production (for funding), demonstrating a greater relationship between these indicators and the distribution of financing. |
id |
UNIFEI_6ef4a9eb333db0695bb5ba1535c840ba |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27885 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pronaf intraregional inequalities in PernambucoLas desigualdades intrarregionales del Pronaf en PernambucoAs desigualdades intrarregionais do Pronaf em Pernambuco Family farmingPronafPernambucoIntraregional inequality.Agricultura familiarPronafPernambucoDesigualdad intrarregional.Agricultura familiarPronafPernambucoDesigualdade intrarregional.Pernambuco has a relevant part of the population that survives from family farming and a substantial portion of this contingent lives in very dry areas. In this scenario, Pronaf, emerges as an important instrument for the poorest groups, especially in the Northeast. In this perspective, the purpose of this article was to analyze how the resources of the Program were distributed among the municipalities of Pernambuco, considering the division of the territory into Development Regions (DR), in the period from 2013 to 2018. For this, we used indexes of Gini, T of Theil and Concentration, making it possible to understand to what extent the distribution of resources was correlated with the importance of these municipalities in state family farming, in terms of number of establishments, area, employed people and production value. As a result, it was found that costing contracts were more unequal and concentrated than investment contracts. As for the variables analyzed, it was observed that they did not reflect the relative importance of the municipalities in family farming and proved to be little dissonant, mainly in relation to the value of production (for funding), demonstrating a greater relationship between these indicators and the distribution of financing.Pernambuco tiene una parte relevante de la población que sobrevive de la agricultura familiar y una parte sustancial de este contingente habita en zonas muy secas. El Pronaf, en ese escenario, emerge como un instrumento importante para los grupos más pobres, principalmente en el Nordeste. En esa perspectiva, el objetivo de este artículo fue analizar cómo los recursos del Programa fueron distribuidos entre los municipios de Pernambuco, frente a la división del territorio en Regiones de Desarrollo (RD), en el período de 2013 a 2018. Para ello, se utilizaron índices de Gini, T de Theil e de Concentración, lo que permitió comprender en qué medida la distribución de los recursos se correlacionó con la importancia de estos municipios en la agricultura familiar estatal, en términos de número de establecimientos, superficie, personas ocupadas y valor de la producción. Como resultado, se encontró que los contratos de financiamiento eran más desiguales y concentrados que los contratos de inversión. En cuanto a las variables analizadas, se observó que no reflejaban la importancia relativa de los municipios en la agricultura familiar y no eran muy diferentes, especialmente en relación al valor de la producción (para financiamiento), demostrando una mayor relación entre este indicador y el distribución de recursos.Pernambuco possui parte relevante da população que sobrevive da agricultura familiar e parcela substancial desse contingente habita áreas bastante secas. O Pronaf, neste cenário, emerge como um instrumento importante aos grupos mais pobres, principalmente no Nordeste. Nessa perspectiva, o objetivo deste artigo foi analisar como os recursos do Programa foram distribuídos entre os municípios pernambucanos, tendo em vista a divisão do território em Regiões de Desenvolvimento (RD), no período de 2013 a 2018. Para isso, utilizou-se índices de Gini, T de Theil e de Concentração, possibilitando compreender em que medida a distribuição dos recursos se correlacionou com a importância desses municípios na agricultura familiar estadual, em termos de número de estabelecimentos, área, pessoal ocupado e valor da produção. Como resultados, verificou-se que os contratos de custeio foram mais desiguais e concentrados que os de investimento. Quanto às variáveis analisadas, observou-se que não refletiram a importância relativa dos municípios na agricultura familiar e se mostraram pouco destoantes, principalmente em relação ao valor da produção (para custeio), demonstrando uma relação maior entre esse indicador e a repartição dos financiamentos.Research, Society and Development2022-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2788510.33448/rsd-v11i4.27885Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e59911427885Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e59911427885Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e599114278852525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27885/24253Copyright (c) 2022 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFialho, Micheli FontesFerreira Neto, José Ambrósio Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos2022-03-27T17:17:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27885Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:45:28.396875Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco Las desigualdades intrarregionales del Pronaf en Pernambuco As desigualdades intrarregionais do Pronaf em Pernambuco |
title |
Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco |
spellingShingle |
Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco Fialho, Micheli Fontes Family farming Pronaf Pernambuco Intraregional inequality. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Pernambuco Desigualdad intrarregional. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Pernambuco Desigualdade intrarregional. |
title_short |
Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco |
title_full |
Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco |
title_fullStr |
Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco |
title_sort |
Pronaf intraregional inequalities in Pernambuco |
author |
Fialho, Micheli Fontes |
author_facet |
Fialho, Micheli Fontes Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fialho, Micheli Fontes Ferreira Neto, José Ambrósio Reis, Janderson Damaceno dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Family farming Pronaf Pernambuco Intraregional inequality. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Pernambuco Desigualdad intrarregional. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Pernambuco Desigualdade intrarregional. |
topic |
Family farming Pronaf Pernambuco Intraregional inequality. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Pernambuco Desigualdad intrarregional. Agricultura familiar Pronaf Pernambuco Desigualdade intrarregional. |
description |
Pernambuco has a relevant part of the population that survives from family farming and a substantial portion of this contingent lives in very dry areas. In this scenario, Pronaf, emerges as an important instrument for the poorest groups, especially in the Northeast. In this perspective, the purpose of this article was to analyze how the resources of the Program were distributed among the municipalities of Pernambuco, considering the division of the territory into Development Regions (DR), in the period from 2013 to 2018. For this, we used indexes of Gini, T of Theil and Concentration, making it possible to understand to what extent the distribution of resources was correlated with the importance of these municipalities in state family farming, in terms of number of establishments, area, employed people and production value. As a result, it was found that costing contracts were more unequal and concentrated than investment contracts. As for the variables analyzed, it was observed that they did not reflect the relative importance of the municipalities in family farming and proved to be little dissonant, mainly in relation to the value of production (for funding), demonstrating a greater relationship between these indicators and the distribution of financing. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27885 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27885 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27885 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27885 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27885/24253 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Micheli Fontes Fialho; José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto; Janderson Damaceno dos Reis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e59911427885 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e59911427885 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e59911427885 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052708453089280 |