Implementation of quality tools in a stuffed pasta industry
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5444 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to promote improvements through the implementation of a combination of quality tools (checklists, brainstorming, Ishikawa diagram, flowchart, program 5S, 5W1H, PDCA, training, and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) in a small pasta industry in Maringá - Paraná, Brazil. The industry is located in the Northwest of Paraná, Brazil, and has a processing capacity of 5000 units of “salgados" per hour. The implementation of the quality tools was carried out according to the stages of the PDCA cycle (plan, do, action, and check). The effectiveness of the measures adopted was measured by comparing the total percentages of conformities and non-conformities before and after the implementation of the tools. The results showed improvements in the processes and products of the industry, due to the significant increase in compliance to 79,04 %, while before the implementation of the tools it was 56,94%. Therefore, the results indicated that the implementation of quality tools provided improvements, as it impacted the increase in compliance with the requirements required by the legislation (RDC 275 from ANVISA), as well as changed the general organization and quality of the industry. |
id |
UNIFEI_7768eb2feed2ec04e764214c78fe7ecc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5444 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Implementation of quality tools in a stuffed pasta industryImplementación de herramientas de calidad en una industria de pasta rellenaImplementação de ferramentas de qualidade em uma indústria de massas alimentícias recheadasGood manufacturing practicesPDCA cycle5S ProgramBuenas prácticas de fabricaciónCiclo PDCAPrograma 5S.Boas práticas de fabricaçãoCiclo PDCAPrograma 5S. This study aimed to promote improvements through the implementation of a combination of quality tools (checklists, brainstorming, Ishikawa diagram, flowchart, program 5S, 5W1H, PDCA, training, and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) in a small pasta industry in Maringá - Paraná, Brazil. The industry is located in the Northwest of Paraná, Brazil, and has a processing capacity of 5000 units of “salgados" per hour. The implementation of the quality tools was carried out according to the stages of the PDCA cycle (plan, do, action, and check). The effectiveness of the measures adopted was measured by comparing the total percentages of conformities and non-conformities before and after the implementation of the tools. The results showed improvements in the processes and products of the industry, due to the significant increase in compliance to 79,04 %, while before the implementation of the tools it was 56,94%. Therefore, the results indicated that the implementation of quality tools provided improvements, as it impacted the increase in compliance with the requirements required by the legislation (RDC 275 from ANVISA), as well as changed the general organization and quality of the industry.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo promover mejoras a través de la implementación de una combinación de herramientas de calidad (listas de verificación, lluvia de ideas, diagrama de Ishikawa, diagrama de flujo, programa 5S, 5W1H, ciclo PDCA, capacitación y buenas prácticas de fabricación (GMP) en una industria de pasta rellena pequeña, en Maringá - Paraná, Brasil. La industria está ubicada en el noroeste de Paraná, Brasil, y tiene una capacidad de procesamiento de 5000 unidades "saladas" por hora. La implementación de herramientas de calidad se llevó a cabo de acuerdo con Pasos del ciclo PDCA La eficacia de las medidas adoptadas se midió comparando los porcentajes totales de conformidades y no conformidades antes y después de la implementación de las herramientas. Los resultados mostraron mejoras en los procesos y productos de la industria, debido al aumento significativo de las conformidades. al 79.04%, mientras que antes de la implementación de las herramientas era del 56.94%, por lo tanto, los resultados indican Estoy convencido de que la implementación de herramientas de calidad proporcionó mejoras, ya que impactó el aumento de conformidad con los requisitos exigidos por la legislación (RDC 275 de ANVISA), así como también cambió la organización general y la calidad de la industria.Este estudo objetivou promover melhorias através da implementação de uma combinação de ferramentas de qualidade (checklists, brainstorming, diagrama de Ishikawa, fluxograma, programa 5S, 5W1H, ciclo PDCA, treinamentos e Boas Práticas de Fabricação (BPF) em uma indústria de massas alimentícias recheadas de pequeno porte, em Maringá - Paraná, Brasil. A indústria está localizada no Noroeste do Paraná, Brasil, e tem uma capacidade de processamento de 5000 unidades de “salgados” por hora. A implementação das ferramentas de qualidade foi realizada de acordo com as etapas do ciclo PDCA. A efetividade das medidas adotadas foi mensurada por meio da comparação do total de porcentagens de conformidades e não conformidades antes e depois da implementação das ferramentas. Os resultados mostraram melhorias nos processos e produtos da indústria, devido ao aumento significativo das conformidades para 79.04%, enquanto antes da implementação das ferramentas era de 56,94%. Portanto, os resultados indicaram que a implementação de ferramentas de qualidade proveu melhorias, à medida que impactou no aumento de conformidades com os requisitos exigidos pela legislação (RDC 275 da ANVISA), bem como mudou a organização geral e qualidade da indústria.Research, Society and Development2020-07-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/544410.33448/rsd-v9i8.5444Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e600985444Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e600985444Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e6009854442525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5444/5254Copyright (c) 2020 Jiuliane Martins da Silva, Giovana Teles, Clara Mariana Gonçalves Lima, Tatiana Colombo Pimentel, Oscar de Oliveira Santos Júnior, Grasiele Scaramal Madronahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Jiuliane Martins daTeles, GiovanaLima, Clara Mariana GonçalvesPimentel, Tatiana ColomboSantos Júnior, Oscar de OliveiraMadrona, Grasiele Scaramal2020-08-20T18:00:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5444Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:28:57.472539Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Implementation of quality tools in a stuffed pasta industry Implementación de herramientas de calidad en una industria de pasta rellena Implementação de ferramentas de qualidade em uma indústria de massas alimentícias recheadas |
title |
Implementation of quality tools in a stuffed pasta industry |
spellingShingle |
Implementation of quality tools in a stuffed pasta industry Silva, Jiuliane Martins da Good manufacturing practices PDCA cycle 5S Program Buenas prácticas de fabricación Ciclo PDCA Programa 5S. Boas práticas de fabricação Ciclo PDCA Programa 5S. |
title_short |
Implementation of quality tools in a stuffed pasta industry |
title_full |
Implementation of quality tools in a stuffed pasta industry |
title_fullStr |
Implementation of quality tools in a stuffed pasta industry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implementation of quality tools in a stuffed pasta industry |
title_sort |
Implementation of quality tools in a stuffed pasta industry |
author |
Silva, Jiuliane Martins da |
author_facet |
Silva, Jiuliane Martins da Teles, Giovana Lima, Clara Mariana Gonçalves Pimentel, Tatiana Colombo Santos Júnior, Oscar de Oliveira Madrona, Grasiele Scaramal |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Teles, Giovana Lima, Clara Mariana Gonçalves Pimentel, Tatiana Colombo Santos Júnior, Oscar de Oliveira Madrona, Grasiele Scaramal |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Jiuliane Martins da Teles, Giovana Lima, Clara Mariana Gonçalves Pimentel, Tatiana Colombo Santos Júnior, Oscar de Oliveira Madrona, Grasiele Scaramal |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Good manufacturing practices PDCA cycle 5S Program Buenas prácticas de fabricación Ciclo PDCA Programa 5S. Boas práticas de fabricação Ciclo PDCA Programa 5S. |
topic |
Good manufacturing practices PDCA cycle 5S Program Buenas prácticas de fabricación Ciclo PDCA Programa 5S. Boas práticas de fabricação Ciclo PDCA Programa 5S. |
description |
This study aimed to promote improvements through the implementation of a combination of quality tools (checklists, brainstorming, Ishikawa diagram, flowchart, program 5S, 5W1H, PDCA, training, and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) in a small pasta industry in Maringá - Paraná, Brazil. The industry is located in the Northwest of Paraná, Brazil, and has a processing capacity of 5000 units of “salgados" per hour. The implementation of the quality tools was carried out according to the stages of the PDCA cycle (plan, do, action, and check). The effectiveness of the measures adopted was measured by comparing the total percentages of conformities and non-conformities before and after the implementation of the tools. The results showed improvements in the processes and products of the industry, due to the significant increase in compliance to 79,04 %, while before the implementation of the tools it was 56,94%. Therefore, the results indicated that the implementation of quality tools provided improvements, as it impacted the increase in compliance with the requirements required by the legislation (RDC 275 from ANVISA), as well as changed the general organization and quality of the industry. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5444 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5444 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5444 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5444 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5444/5254 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e600985444 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e600985444 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e600985444 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052779101945856 |