STS Education and Critical Mathematics Education in the guidelines for undergraduate courses in Mathematics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4308 |
Resumo: | The formation of the mathematics teacher is the target of different investigations and criticisms. Some studies detail the exacerbated technical training, others the lack of connection with the practice. Based on such aspects, STS Education (Science, Technology and Society) and Critical Mathematical Education present themselves as possible ways to use Mathematics consciously and that helps in understanding the environment and in decision-making. In this context, the guiding question of this work investigates whether: Are there any similarities between the official documents that guide the Teacher Education courses in Mathematics and the theoretical assumptions of STS Education and Critical Mathematical Education? To answer this question, we set ourselves the objective of analyzing the Mathematics Teacher Training based on an analysis of the guiding documents for the construction of the curricula of the Mathematics Degree Courses, namely, the CNE / CES Opinion 1.302 / 2001, which defines the Guidelines National Curricula for Mathematics, Bachelor and Licentiate Courses and Resolution CNE / CES 3, of February 18, 2003, which establishes the Curriculum Guidelines for Mathematics courses, both public documents available on the website of the Ministry of Education. These were analyzed in the light of the literature that presents STS Education and Critical Mathematical Education. The methodology used is of a qualitative and documentary analysis. The results show that there are explicitly few guidelines in this context, focusing more on the formation of specific themes that are linked to the theme presented in the question that guides the work. |
id |
UNIFEI_7d0cf90814b7579020d4574350e18265 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4308 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
STS Education and Critical Mathematics Education in the guidelines for undergraduate courses in MathematicsEducación CTS y Educación Matemática Crítica en las directrices para cursos de licenciatura en matemáticasEducação CTS e Educação Matemática Crítica nas diretrizes para os cursos de Licenciatura em MatemáticaFormação de ProfessoresEducação CTSEducação Matemática Crítica.Formación DocenteEducación CTSEducación Matemática Crítica.Teacher EducationSTS EducationCritical Mathematics Education.The formation of the mathematics teacher is the target of different investigations and criticisms. Some studies detail the exacerbated technical training, others the lack of connection with the practice. Based on such aspects, STS Education (Science, Technology and Society) and Critical Mathematical Education present themselves as possible ways to use Mathematics consciously and that helps in understanding the environment and in decision-making. In this context, the guiding question of this work investigates whether: Are there any similarities between the official documents that guide the Teacher Education courses in Mathematics and the theoretical assumptions of STS Education and Critical Mathematical Education? To answer this question, we set ourselves the objective of analyzing the Mathematics Teacher Training based on an analysis of the guiding documents for the construction of the curricula of the Mathematics Degree Courses, namely, the CNE / CES Opinion 1.302 / 2001, which defines the Guidelines National Curricula for Mathematics, Bachelor and Licentiate Courses and Resolution CNE / CES 3, of February 18, 2003, which establishes the Curriculum Guidelines for Mathematics courses, both public documents available on the website of the Ministry of Education. These were analyzed in the light of the literature that presents STS Education and Critical Mathematical Education. The methodology used is of a qualitative and documentary analysis. The results show that there are explicitly few guidelines in this context, focusing more on the formation of specific themes that are linked to the theme presented in the question that guides the work.La formación del profesor de matemáticas es objeto de diferentes investigaciones y críticas. Algunos estudios detallan la formación técnica exacerbada, otros la falta de conexión con la práctica. En base a tales aspectos, la Educación CTS (Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad) y la Educación Matemática Crítica se presentan como posibles formas de usar las Matemáticas de manera consciente y eso ayuda a comprender el entorno y la toma de decisiones. En este contexto, la pregunta orientadora de este trabajo investiga si: ¿Hay alguna similitud entre los documentos oficiales que guían los cursos de Formación Docente en Matemáticas y los supuestos teóricos de Educación CTS y Educación Matemática Crítica? Para responder a esta pregunta, nos propusimos el objetivo de analizar la Formación de Profesores de Matemáticas basada en un análisis de los documentos de orientación para la construcción de los planes de estudio de los Cursos de Grado en Matemáticas, a saber, la Opinión 1.302 / 2001 del CNE / CES, que define las Directrices. Currículo nacional de matemática, licenciatura y licenciatura y resolución CNE / CES 3, de 18 de febrero de 2003, que establece las Directrices curriculares para los cursos de matemática, ambos documentos públicos disponibles en el sitio web del Ministerio de Educación. Estos fueron analizados a la luz de la literatura que presenta la Educación CTS y la Educación Matemática Crítica. La metodología utilizada es de análisis cualitativo y documental. Los resultados muestran que hay explícitamente pocas pautas en este contexto, centrándose más en la formación de temas específicos que están vinculados con el tema presentado en la pregunta que guía el trabajo.A formação do professor de matemática é alvo de diferentes investigações e críticas. Alguns estudos detalham a formação tecnicista exacerbada, outros a falta de vínculo com a prática. Com base em tais aspectos, a Educação CTS (Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade) e a Educação Matemática Crítica apresentam-se como possíveis caminhos para o uso da Matemática de forma consciente e que auxilie na compreensão do entorno e na tomada de decisões. Neste contexto, a questão balizadora deste trabalho investiga se: Há aproximações entre os documentos oficiais que norteiam os cursos de Formação de Professores em Matemática e os pressupostos teóricos da Educação CTS e Educação Matemática Crítica? Para responder esta questão, estabelecemos como objetivo analisar a Formação do Professor de Matemática pautado em uma análise dos documentos balizadores para a construção dos currículos dos Cursos de Licenciatura em Matemática, a saber, o Parecer CNE/CES 1.302/2001, que define as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais para os Cursos de Matemática, Bacharelado e Licenciatura e a Resolução CNE/CES 3, de 18 de fevereiro de 2003, que estabelece as Diretrizes Curriculares para os cursos de Matemática, ambos documentos públicos disponíveis no site do Ministério da Educação. Estes foram analisados a luz da literatura que apresenta a Educação CTS e a Educação Matemática Crítica. A Metodologia utilizada é de caráter qualitativo e de análise documental. Os resultados apontam que explicitamente, há poucas orientações neste contexto, focando mais na formação de temas específicos que ligados à temática apresentados na questão que baliza o trabalho.Research, Society and Development2020-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/430810.33448/rsd-v9i7.4308Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 7; e583974308Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 7; e583974308Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 7; e5839743082525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4308/3967Copyright (c) 2020 Evonir Albrecht, Maria Delourdes Macielinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlbrecht, EvonirMaciel, Maria Delourdes2020-08-20T18:05:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4308Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:28:12.303193Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
STS Education and Critical Mathematics Education in the guidelines for undergraduate courses in Mathematics Educación CTS y Educación Matemática Crítica en las directrices para cursos de licenciatura en matemáticas Educação CTS e Educação Matemática Crítica nas diretrizes para os cursos de Licenciatura em Matemática |
title |
STS Education and Critical Mathematics Education in the guidelines for undergraduate courses in Mathematics |
spellingShingle |
STS Education and Critical Mathematics Education in the guidelines for undergraduate courses in Mathematics Albrecht, Evonir Formação de Professores Educação CTS Educação Matemática Crítica. Formación Docente Educación CTS Educación Matemática Crítica. Teacher Education STS Education Critical Mathematics Education. |
title_short |
STS Education and Critical Mathematics Education in the guidelines for undergraduate courses in Mathematics |
title_full |
STS Education and Critical Mathematics Education in the guidelines for undergraduate courses in Mathematics |
title_fullStr |
STS Education and Critical Mathematics Education in the guidelines for undergraduate courses in Mathematics |
title_full_unstemmed |
STS Education and Critical Mathematics Education in the guidelines for undergraduate courses in Mathematics |
title_sort |
STS Education and Critical Mathematics Education in the guidelines for undergraduate courses in Mathematics |
author |
Albrecht, Evonir |
author_facet |
Albrecht, Evonir Maciel, Maria Delourdes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Maciel, Maria Delourdes |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Albrecht, Evonir Maciel, Maria Delourdes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Formação de Professores Educação CTS Educação Matemática Crítica. Formación Docente Educación CTS Educación Matemática Crítica. Teacher Education STS Education Critical Mathematics Education. |
topic |
Formação de Professores Educação CTS Educação Matemática Crítica. Formación Docente Educación CTS Educación Matemática Crítica. Teacher Education STS Education Critical Mathematics Education. |
description |
The formation of the mathematics teacher is the target of different investigations and criticisms. Some studies detail the exacerbated technical training, others the lack of connection with the practice. Based on such aspects, STS Education (Science, Technology and Society) and Critical Mathematical Education present themselves as possible ways to use Mathematics consciously and that helps in understanding the environment and in decision-making. In this context, the guiding question of this work investigates whether: Are there any similarities between the official documents that guide the Teacher Education courses in Mathematics and the theoretical assumptions of STS Education and Critical Mathematical Education? To answer this question, we set ourselves the objective of analyzing the Mathematics Teacher Training based on an analysis of the guiding documents for the construction of the curricula of the Mathematics Degree Courses, namely, the CNE / CES Opinion 1.302 / 2001, which defines the Guidelines National Curricula for Mathematics, Bachelor and Licentiate Courses and Resolution CNE / CES 3, of February 18, 2003, which establishes the Curriculum Guidelines for Mathematics courses, both public documents available on the website of the Ministry of Education. These were analyzed in the light of the literature that presents STS Education and Critical Mathematical Education. The methodology used is of a qualitative and documentary analysis. The results show that there are explicitly few guidelines in this context, focusing more on the formation of specific themes that are linked to the theme presented in the question that guides the work. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4308 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4308 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4308 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4308 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4308/3967 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Evonir Albrecht, Maria Delourdes Maciel info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Evonir Albrecht, Maria Delourdes Maciel |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 7; e583974308 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 7; e583974308 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 7; e583974308 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052649834545152 |