Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Najara Barbosa da
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14729
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14729
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the intervention: motivation and follow-up by health professionals in the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding, by means of a randomized clinical trial. In the pregnancy, women they were interviewed (n = 154) and followed up until the six month after delivery. In the pregnancy, all received pamphlets and watched a video on breastfeeding promotion in the first interview, being randomly divided into groups: intervention (n = 51) and control (n = 103). The group Intervention was receive home care for up to 5 days and a telephone call back 2 and 14 weeks after delivery by health professionals. After 6 months, 124 mothers (Intervention = 50 and Control = 74) were interviewed. The mothers' mean age was 26.5 (± 6.1) years, and the majority were non-white skin color (58.9%), lived with a partner (79%), with up to 8 years of schooling (70.2%); multiparous (64.5%); did not work (54.8%), and earned up to 2 Minimum Wages (81.4%). Most babies were male (52.4%) and born by cesarean section (61.3%). Exclusive breastfeeding rates in intervention were 84%, 82%, 54% and 34% for 5 days, 2 weeks, 14 weeks and 6 months, respectively and in control was 17.6% for 6 months. The group intervention had higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding (p = 0.03, RR 1.25) and breastfeeding (p = 0.02, RR 2.03) compared to control. The studied intervention (motivation and follow-up) promoted positive changes in the duration and exclusivity of breast feeding at 6 months of age, compared to traditional health education, and can be used in the promotion of breastfeeding practice by health services.
id UNIFEI_7ff02be76abf469b9a8a2db16f5f8b9f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14729
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
spelling Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practiceEnsayo clínico aleatorio sobre la influencia de la motivación y el seguimiento por parte de los profesionales sanitarios en la práctica de la lactancia materna Estudo clínico randomizado sobre a influência da motivação e acompanhamento de profissionais de saúde na prática de aleitamento maternoAleitamento MaternoEnsaio ClínicoEducação em saúdeEntrevista motivacional.Lactancia MaternaEnsayo ClínicoEducación en SaludEntrevista Motivacional.Breast FeedingClinical TrialHealth EducationMotivational interviewing.This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the intervention: motivation and follow-up by health professionals in the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding, by means of a randomized clinical trial. In the pregnancy, women they were interviewed (n = 154) and followed up until the six month after delivery. In the pregnancy, all received pamphlets and watched a video on breastfeeding promotion in the first interview, being randomly divided into groups: intervention (n = 51) and control (n = 103). The group Intervention was receive home care for up to 5 days and a telephone call back 2 and 14 weeks after delivery by health professionals. After 6 months, 124 mothers (Intervention = 50 and Control = 74) were interviewed. The mothers' mean age was 26.5 (± 6.1) years, and the majority were non-white skin color (58.9%), lived with a partner (79%), with up to 8 years of schooling (70.2%); multiparous (64.5%); did not work (54.8%), and earned up to 2 Minimum Wages (81.4%). Most babies were male (52.4%) and born by cesarean section (61.3%). Exclusive breastfeeding rates in intervention were 84%, 82%, 54% and 34% for 5 days, 2 weeks, 14 weeks and 6 months, respectively and in control was 17.6% for 6 months. The group intervention had higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding (p = 0.03, RR 1.25) and breastfeeding (p = 0.02, RR 2.03) compared to control. The studied intervention (motivation and follow-up) promoted positive changes in the duration and exclusivity of breast feeding at 6 months of age, compared to traditional health education, and can be used in the promotion of breastfeeding practice by health services.Este estudio tenía como objetivo evaluar el impacto de la intervención: acompañamiento y la motivación por parte de los profesionales de la salud n la duración y exclusividad de la lactancia, mediante un estudio clínico aleatorio. Se entrevistó a las mujeres embarazadas (n=154) y se les hizo un seguimiento hasta el sexto mes después del parto. En el embarazo, todas ellas recibieron un folleto y vieron un vídeo sobre la promoción de la lactancia materna en la primera entrevista, siendo divididas aleatoriamente en grupos: intervención (n=51) y control (n=103).  El grupo de intervención recibió un control domiciliario a los 5 días y un seguimiento telefónico a las 2 y 14 semanas después del parto. Después de 6 meses, se entrevistó a 124 madres (Intervención=50 y Control=74). La edad media de las madres fue de 26,5(±6,1) años, y la mayoría de ellas eran: de color de piel no blanco (58,9%), vivían en pareja (79%), tenían hasta 8 años de escolaridad (70,2%); eran multíparas (64,5%); no trabajaban (54,8%) y recibían hasta 2 salarios mínimos (81,4%). La mayoría de los bebés eran varones (52,4%) y nacieron por cesárea (61,3%). La tasa de lactancia materna exclusiva fue del 84%, 82%, 54% y 34% a los 5 días, 2 semanas, 14 semanas y 6 meses respectivamente en el grupo de Intervención y del 17,6% a los 6 meses en el grupo de Control. El grupo de intervención tuvo una mayor tasa de lactancia materna exclusiva (p=0,03, RR 1,25) y de lactancia materna (p=0,02, RR 2,03) en comparación con el control. La intervención estudiada promovió cambios positivos en la duración y la exclusividad de la lactancia materna a los 6 meses de edad en comparación con la educación sanitaria tradicional, y puede utilizarse para promover la lactancia materna por parte de los servicios sanitarios.Este estudo objetivou avaliar o impacto da intervenção: motivação e acompanhamento por profissionais de saúde na duração e exclusividade do aleitamento materno, por meio de um estudo clínico randomizado. As gestantes foram entrevistadas (n=154) e acompanhadas até sexto mês após parto. Todas receberam panfleto e assistiram vídeo sobre promoção do aleitamento materno na primeira entrevista na gestação, sendo divididas aleatoriamente em grupos: intervenção (n=51) e controle (n=103).  O grupo de intervenção recebeu acompanhamento domiciliar aos 5 dias e retorno telefônico em 2 e 14 semanas após o parto. Após 6 meses de acompanhamento, 124 mães (Intervenção=50 e Controle=74) foram entrevistadas. A idade média das mães foi 26,5(±6.1) anos, sendo a maioria: cor de pele não-branca (58,9%), morava com companheiro (79%), até 8 anos de estudo (70,2%); multípara (64,5%); não trabalhava (54,8%) e recebia até 2 Salários Mínimos (81,4%). A maioria dos bebês era do sexo masculino (52,4%) e nascido de parto cesárea (61,3%). A taxa de aleitamento materno exclusivo foi 84%, 82%, 54% e 34% aos 5 dias, 2 semanas, 14 semanas e 6 meses respectivamente no grupo Intervenção e 17,6% aos 6 meses no grupo Controle. O grupo intervenção teve maior taxa de aleitamento exclusivo (p=0,03, RR 1,25) e aleitamento materno (p=0,02, RR 2,03) em relação ao controle. A intervenção estudada promoveu alterações positivas na duração e exclusividade do aleitamento materno aos 6 meses de idade, em comparação a educação em saúde tradicional, e pode ser usada na promoção da prática do aleitamento materno pelos serviços de saúde.Research, Society and Development2021-05-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1472910.33448/rsd-v10i5.14729Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e18210514729Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e18210514729Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e182105147292525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14729/13299Copyright (c) 2021 Najara Barbosa da Rocha; Suzely Adas Saliba Moimazhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRocha, Najara Barbosa daMoimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba2021-05-17T18:20:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/14729Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:35:46.016461Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
Ensayo clínico aleatorio sobre la influencia de la motivación y el seguimiento por parte de los profesionales sanitarios en la práctica de la lactancia materna
Estudo clínico randomizado sobre a influência da motivação e acompanhamento de profissionais de saúde na prática de aleitamento materno
title Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
spellingShingle Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
Rocha, Najara Barbosa da
Aleitamento Materno
Ensaio Clínico
Educação em saúde
Entrevista motivacional.
Lactancia Materna
Ensayo Clínico
Educación en Salud
Entrevista Motivacional.
Breast Feeding
Clinical Trial
Health Education
Motivational interviewing.
Rocha, Najara Barbosa da
Aleitamento Materno
Ensaio Clínico
Educação em saúde
Entrevista motivacional.
Lactancia Materna
Ensayo Clínico
Educación en Salud
Entrevista Motivacional.
Breast Feeding
Clinical Trial
Health Education
Motivational interviewing.
title_short Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
title_full Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
title_fullStr Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
title_full_unstemmed Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
title_sort Randomized clinical study on the influence of motivation and monitoring of health professionals in the breastfeeding practice
author Rocha, Najara Barbosa da
author_facet Rocha, Najara Barbosa da
Rocha, Najara Barbosa da
Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
author_role author
author2 Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha, Najara Barbosa da
Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aleitamento Materno
Ensaio Clínico
Educação em saúde
Entrevista motivacional.
Lactancia Materna
Ensayo Clínico
Educación en Salud
Entrevista Motivacional.
Breast Feeding
Clinical Trial
Health Education
Motivational interviewing.
topic Aleitamento Materno
Ensaio Clínico
Educação em saúde
Entrevista motivacional.
Lactancia Materna
Ensayo Clínico
Educación en Salud
Entrevista Motivacional.
Breast Feeding
Clinical Trial
Health Education
Motivational interviewing.
description This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the intervention: motivation and follow-up by health professionals in the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding, by means of a randomized clinical trial. In the pregnancy, women they were interviewed (n = 154) and followed up until the six month after delivery. In the pregnancy, all received pamphlets and watched a video on breastfeeding promotion in the first interview, being randomly divided into groups: intervention (n = 51) and control (n = 103). The group Intervention was receive home care for up to 5 days and a telephone call back 2 and 14 weeks after delivery by health professionals. After 6 months, 124 mothers (Intervention = 50 and Control = 74) were interviewed. The mothers' mean age was 26.5 (± 6.1) years, and the majority were non-white skin color (58.9%), lived with a partner (79%), with up to 8 years of schooling (70.2%); multiparous (64.5%); did not work (54.8%), and earned up to 2 Minimum Wages (81.4%). Most babies were male (52.4%) and born by cesarean section (61.3%). Exclusive breastfeeding rates in intervention were 84%, 82%, 54% and 34% for 5 days, 2 weeks, 14 weeks and 6 months, respectively and in control was 17.6% for 6 months. The group intervention had higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding (p = 0.03, RR 1.25) and breastfeeding (p = 0.02, RR 2.03) compared to control. The studied intervention (motivation and follow-up) promoted positive changes in the duration and exclusivity of breast feeding at 6 months of age, compared to traditional health education, and can be used in the promotion of breastfeeding practice by health services.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14729
10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14729
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14729
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14729
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/14729/13299
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Najara Barbosa da Rocha; Suzely Adas Saliba Moimaz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Najara Barbosa da Rocha; Suzely Adas Saliba Moimaz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e18210514729
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e18210514729
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e18210514729
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1822178499212869632
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.14729