Adaptação da The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para o Brasil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/40198 |
Resumo: | Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) affects about 5.8% of the Brazilian population, being the South American country with the highest number of cases. The diagnosis of MDD is performed through clinical assessment with the help of psychological instruments, however, many instruments measure depression in a unifactorial or bifactorial way. The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale (MDAS) seeks to assess MDD in four main domains, namely emotional, cognitive, somatic and interpersonal. This last domain isn’t frequently assessed by instruments for this diagnosis. However, its importance for depressed symptoms. The objective of the present study was to adapt the MDAS instrument to the Brazilian context. This is an adaptation study that followed the steps of translation, synthesis, evaluation by expert judges, evaluation by the target audience, back-translation, and evaluation by the original author of the instrument. The 52 items of the instrument went through all the processes and some underwent semantic and linguistic changes to adapt to the Brazilian culture. The Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) was performed and the instrument obtained a total CVC of 0.93 for clarity and 0.94 for relevance. The instrument adaptation process showed that the MDAS, in Brazilian Portuguese called the Escala Multidimensional de Avaliação da Depressão (EMAD), has a good semantic fit and is suitable for use in Brazil. EMAD presents a broader assessment of depression, which measures different dimensions, including interpersonal symptoms. This contributes to a more complete assessment and as a guide for psychological interventions in clinical practice. |
id |
UNIFEI_918c6d5fe2751237cedc905ab17a40a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40198 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Adaptação da The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para o BrasilAdaptation of The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale for Brazil Adaptación de la The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para BrasilDepressionPsychological TestsPsychometrics.DepresiónPruebas PsicológicasPsicometría.DepressãoTestes PsicológicosPsicometria.Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) affects about 5.8% of the Brazilian population, being the South American country with the highest number of cases. The diagnosis of MDD is performed through clinical assessment with the help of psychological instruments, however, many instruments measure depression in a unifactorial or bifactorial way. The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale (MDAS) seeks to assess MDD in four main domains, namely emotional, cognitive, somatic and interpersonal. This last domain isn’t frequently assessed by instruments for this diagnosis. However, its importance for depressed symptoms. The objective of the present study was to adapt the MDAS instrument to the Brazilian context. This is an adaptation study that followed the steps of translation, synthesis, evaluation by expert judges, evaluation by the target audience, back-translation, and evaluation by the original author of the instrument. The 52 items of the instrument went through all the processes and some underwent semantic and linguistic changes to adapt to the Brazilian culture. The Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) was performed and the instrument obtained a total CVC of 0.93 for clarity and 0.94 for relevance. The instrument adaptation process showed that the MDAS, in Brazilian Portuguese called the Escala Multidimensional de Avaliação da Depressão (EMAD), has a good semantic fit and is suitable for use in Brazil. EMAD presents a broader assessment of depression, which measures different dimensions, including interpersonal symptoms. This contributes to a more complete assessment and as a guide for psychological interventions in clinical practice.El Trastorno Depresivo Mayor (TDM) afecta cerca del 5,8% de la población brasileña, siendo el país sudamericano con mayor número de casos. El diagnóstico de TDM se realiza a través de la evaluación clínica con la ayuda de instrumentos psicológicos, sin embargo, muchos instrumentos miden la depresión de forma unifactorial o bifactorial. La Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale (MDAS) busca evaluar el TDM en cuatro dominios principales: emocional, cognitivo, somático e interpersonal. Este último dominio no es frecuentemente evaluado por instrumentos para este diagnóstico, a pesar de su importancia para los síntomas depresivos. El objetivo del presente estudio fue adaptar el instrumento MDAS al contexto brasileño. Se trata de un estudio de adaptación que siguió las etapas de traducción, síntesis, evaluación por jueces expertos, evaluación por el público objetivo, retrotraducción y evaluación por el autor original del instrumento. Los 52 ítems del instrumento pasaron por todos los procesos y algunos sufrieron cambios semánticos y lingüísticos para adaptarse a Brasil. Se realizó el Coeficiente de Validez de Contenido (CVC) y el instrumento obtuvo un CVC total de 0,93 para claridad y 0,94 para relevancia. El proceso de adaptación del instrumento mostró que la MDAS, en brasileño denominada Escala Multidimensional de Avaliação da Depressão (EMAD), tiene un buen ajuste semántico y es adecuada para su uso en Brasil. EMAD presenta una evaluación más amplia de la depresión, que mide diferentes dimensiones, incluidos los síntomas interpersonales. Esto contribuye a una evaluación más completa y como guía para las intervenciones psicológicas en la práctica clínica.O transtorno Depressivo maior (TDM) acomete cerca de 5,8% da população brasileira, sendo o país da América do Sul com o maior número de casos. O diagnóstico do TDM é realizado através de avaliação clínica com o auxílio de instrumentos psicológicos, entretanto, muitos instrumentos mensuram a depressão de maneira unifatorial ou bifatorial. O The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale busca avaliar o TDM em quatro domínios principais, sendo eles emocional, cognitivo, somático e interpessoal. Este último domínio não é avaliado com frequência por instrumentos para esse diagnóstico, apesar da sua importância para os sintomas depressivos. Diante disso, o objetivo do presente estudo foi adaptar o instrumento MDAS para o contexto brasileiro. Trata-se de um estudo de adaptação que seguiu os passos de tradução, síntese, avaliação por juízes especialistas, avaliação pelo público-alvo, retrotradução e avaliação da autora original do instrumento. Os 52 itens do instrumento passaram por todos os processos e alguns sofreram modificações semânticas e linguísticas para adequação a cultura brasileira. O Coeficiente de Validade de Conteúdo (CVC) foi realizado e o instrumento obteve CVC total de 0,93 para clareza e 0,94 para pertinência. O processo de adaptação do instrumento demonstrou que a MDAS, no português brasileiro intitulada de Escala Multidimensional de Avaliação da Depressão (EMAD), apresenta bom ajuste semântico e está adequada para uso no Brasil. A EMAD apresenta uma avaliação da depressão mais ampla, que mensura diferentes dimensões, incluindo os sintomas interpessoais. Isso contribui para uma avaliação mais completa e como guia para as intervenções psicológicas na prática clínica.Research, Society and Development2023-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4019810.33448/rsd-v12i2.40198Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 No. 2; e23612240198Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 Núm. 2; e23612240198Research, Society and Development; v. 12 n. 2; e236122401982525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/40198/32912Copyright (c) 2023 Theodora Larsen Schneiders ; Franciele Cristiane Peloso; Michele Zanella; Amy Ho Nam Cheung; Murilo Ricardo Zibettihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchneiders , Theodora Larsen Peloso, Franciele Cristiane Zanella, MicheleCheung, Amy Ho Nam Zibetti, Murilo Ricardo2023-02-14T20:07:52Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40198Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2023-02-14T20:07:52Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Adaptação da The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para o Brasil Adaptation of The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale for Brazil Adaptación de la The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para Brasil |
title |
Adaptação da The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para o Brasil |
spellingShingle |
Adaptação da The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para o Brasil Schneiders , Theodora Larsen Depression Psychological Tests Psychometrics. Depresión Pruebas Psicológicas Psicometría. Depressão Testes Psicológicos Psicometria. |
title_short |
Adaptação da The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para o Brasil |
title_full |
Adaptação da The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para o Brasil |
title_fullStr |
Adaptação da The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para o Brasil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adaptação da The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para o Brasil |
title_sort |
Adaptação da The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale para o Brasil |
author |
Schneiders , Theodora Larsen |
author_facet |
Schneiders , Theodora Larsen Peloso, Franciele Cristiane Zanella, Michele Cheung, Amy Ho Nam Zibetti, Murilo Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Peloso, Franciele Cristiane Zanella, Michele Cheung, Amy Ho Nam Zibetti, Murilo Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schneiders , Theodora Larsen Peloso, Franciele Cristiane Zanella, Michele Cheung, Amy Ho Nam Zibetti, Murilo Ricardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Depression Psychological Tests Psychometrics. Depresión Pruebas Psicológicas Psicometría. Depressão Testes Psicológicos Psicometria. |
topic |
Depression Psychological Tests Psychometrics. Depresión Pruebas Psicológicas Psicometría. Depressão Testes Psicológicos Psicometria. |
description |
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) affects about 5.8% of the Brazilian population, being the South American country with the highest number of cases. The diagnosis of MDD is performed through clinical assessment with the help of psychological instruments, however, many instruments measure depression in a unifactorial or bifactorial way. The Multidimensional Depression Assessment Scale (MDAS) seeks to assess MDD in four main domains, namely emotional, cognitive, somatic and interpersonal. This last domain isn’t frequently assessed by instruments for this diagnosis. However, its importance for depressed symptoms. The objective of the present study was to adapt the MDAS instrument to the Brazilian context. This is an adaptation study that followed the steps of translation, synthesis, evaluation by expert judges, evaluation by the target audience, back-translation, and evaluation by the original author of the instrument. The 52 items of the instrument went through all the processes and some underwent semantic and linguistic changes to adapt to the Brazilian culture. The Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) was performed and the instrument obtained a total CVC of 0.93 for clarity and 0.94 for relevance. The instrument adaptation process showed that the MDAS, in Brazilian Portuguese called the Escala Multidimensional de Avaliação da Depressão (EMAD), has a good semantic fit and is suitable for use in Brazil. EMAD presents a broader assessment of depression, which measures different dimensions, including interpersonal symptoms. This contributes to a more complete assessment and as a guide for psychological interventions in clinical practice. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-02-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/40198 10.33448/rsd-v12i2.40198 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/40198 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v12i2.40198 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/40198/32912 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 No. 2; e23612240198 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 12 Núm. 2; e23612240198 Research, Society and Development; v. 12 n. 2; e23612240198 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052618205298688 |