Speak or shut up: that is the question for nurses
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16427 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The way how inter-professional relationships in health are established can generate errors and harm to patients. Objective: examine the nurses' ability to manifest themselves in the face of failures in patient care with the potential for adverse events; and, identify facilitators capable of enhancing the voice of nurses, in the face of ongoing unsafe acts, practiced by health professionals in two hospitals in the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre / RS. Methodology: a multiple and embedded case study was carried out. Data collection between July and August 2020, through semi-structured, virtual, and recorded interviews; for data analysis, the method of analysis of Laurence Bardin was adopted. Results: the ability of nurses to express their concerns related to patient safety depended on some factors in addition to the severity of the damage, such as the personal aspect, the person to be challenged or questioned, the professional (where, approaching the medical team was more difficult than the nursing technician), and the situation or context. Speech enhancers also emerged, mainly: personnel, experience, knowledge, leadership, management, and processes. Conclusion: personal characteristics, such as maturity, and knowledge, helped in decision making, while interdisciplinarity appeared discreetly in the speeches, reinforcing the need for teamwork with this focus, in order to share knowledge and support in uncertainties. |
id |
UNIFEI_ae4d58309a112a10cbe8f6568b7f355f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16427 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Speak or shut up: that is the question for nursesHablar o callar: esa es la cuestión para los enfermerosFalar ou calar: eis a questão para enfermeirosComunicaciónBarreras de comunicaciónSeguridad del pacienteErrores médicos.CommunicationCommunication barriersPatient safetyMedical errors.ComunicaçãoBarreiras de comunicaçãoSegurança do pacienteErros médicos.Introduction: The way how inter-professional relationships in health are established can generate errors and harm to patients. Objective: examine the nurses' ability to manifest themselves in the face of failures in patient care with the potential for adverse events; and, identify facilitators capable of enhancing the voice of nurses, in the face of ongoing unsafe acts, practiced by health professionals in two hospitals in the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre / RS. Methodology: a multiple and embedded case study was carried out. Data collection between July and August 2020, through semi-structured, virtual, and recorded interviews; for data analysis, the method of analysis of Laurence Bardin was adopted. Results: the ability of nurses to express their concerns related to patient safety depended on some factors in addition to the severity of the damage, such as the personal aspect, the person to be challenged or questioned, the professional (where, approaching the medical team was more difficult than the nursing technician), and the situation or context. Speech enhancers also emerged, mainly: personnel, experience, knowledge, leadership, management, and processes. Conclusion: personal characteristics, such as maturity, and knowledge, helped in decision making, while interdisciplinarity appeared discreetly in the speeches, reinforcing the need for teamwork with this focus, in order to share knowledge and support in uncertainties.Introducción: La forma en que se establecen las relaciones interprofesionales en salud, pueden generar errores y resultar daños para los pacientes. Objetivo: examinar la capacidad de los enfermeros para manifestaren se ante fallas en la atención al paciente con potencial de eventos adversos; e, identificar facilitadores capaces de realzar la voz de los enfermeros, ante los actos inseguros en curso, practicados por profesionales de la salud en dos hospitales de la región metropolitana de Porto Alegre / RS. Metodología: se realizó un estudio de caso múltiple e integrado. Recolección de datos entre julio y agosto de 2020, a través de entrevistas semi-estructuradas, virtuales y grabadas; para el análisis de datos, se adoptó el método de análisis de Laurence Bardin. Resultados: la capacidad de los enfermeros para expresar sus inquietudes relacionadas con la seguridad del paciente dependió de algunos factores además de la gravedad del daño, como el aspecto personal, la persona a ser contestada o cuestionada, el profesional (donde, acercarse al equipo médico fue más difícil que el técnico de enfermería), y la situación o contexto. También surgieron potenciadores del habla, principalmente: personal, experiencia, conocimiento, liderazgo, gestión y procesos. Conclusión: las características personales, como la madurez y el conocimiento, ayudaron en la toma de decisiones, mientras que la interdisciplinariedad apareció discretamente en los discursos, reforzando la necesidad del trabajo en equipo con este enfoque, para compartir conocimientos y apoyos en las incertidumbres.Introdução: A forma como as relações interprofissionais em saúde se estabelece, podem gerar erros e resultar em danos aos pacientes. Objetivos: examinar a capacidade dos enfermeiros para manifestarem-se frente às falhas de assistência ao paciente com potencial para eventos adversos; e, identificar os facilitadores capazes de potencializar a voz dos enfermeiros, frente aos atos inseguros em curso, praticados por profissionais da saúde em dois hospitais da região metropolitana de Porto Alegre/RS. Metodologia: realizado um estudo de caso múltiplo e incorporado. A coleta de dados entre julho a agosto de 2020, por meio de entrevista semiestruturada, virtual e gravada; para análise dos dados adotou-se o método de análise de Laurence Bardin. Resultados: a capacidade de enfermeiros manifestarem suas preocupações relacionadas à segurança do paciente dependeu de alguns fatores além da gravidade do dano, tais quais, o aspecto pessoal, a pessoa a ser contestada ou questionada, o profissional (onde, abordar a equipe médica foi mais difícil que a técnica de enfermagem), e a situação ou contexto. Os potenciadores da fala também emergiram, principalmente: pessoal, experiência, conhecimento, liderança, gestão e processos. Conclusão: características pessoais, tal qual a maturidade, e conhecimento, auxiliaram na tomada de decisão, enquanto a interdisciplinaridade apareceu discretamente nos discursos, reforçando a necessidade do trabalho em equipe com este foco, a fim do compartilhamento de conhecimento e apoio nas incertezas.Research, Society and Development2021-06-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1642710.33448/rsd-v10i7.16427Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e2821076427Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e2821076427Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e28210764272525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16427/14786Copyright (c) 2021 Carolina Sityá Carús; André Guirland Vieira; Letícia Thomasi Jahnke Botton; Claudio Schubert; Maria Anobes Grespan Fagundeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Carús, Carolina SityáVieira, André Guirland Botton, Letícia Thomasi JahnkeSchubert, Claudio Fagundes, Maria Anobes Grespan2021-07-18T21:07:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16427Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:36:58.843322Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Speak or shut up: that is the question for nurses Hablar o callar: esa es la cuestión para los enfermeros Falar ou calar: eis a questão para enfermeiros |
title |
Speak or shut up: that is the question for nurses |
spellingShingle |
Speak or shut up: that is the question for nurses Carús, Carolina Sityá Comunicación Barreras de comunicación Seguridad del paciente Errores médicos. Communication Communication barriers Patient safety Medical errors. Comunicação Barreiras de comunicação Segurança do paciente Erros médicos. |
title_short |
Speak or shut up: that is the question for nurses |
title_full |
Speak or shut up: that is the question for nurses |
title_fullStr |
Speak or shut up: that is the question for nurses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Speak or shut up: that is the question for nurses |
title_sort |
Speak or shut up: that is the question for nurses |
author |
Carús, Carolina Sityá |
author_facet |
Carús, Carolina Sityá Vieira, André Guirland Botton, Letícia Thomasi Jahnke Schubert, Claudio Fagundes, Maria Anobes Grespan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vieira, André Guirland Botton, Letícia Thomasi Jahnke Schubert, Claudio Fagundes, Maria Anobes Grespan |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carús, Carolina Sityá Vieira, André Guirland Botton, Letícia Thomasi Jahnke Schubert, Claudio Fagundes, Maria Anobes Grespan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Comunicación Barreras de comunicación Seguridad del paciente Errores médicos. Communication Communication barriers Patient safety Medical errors. Comunicação Barreiras de comunicação Segurança do paciente Erros médicos. |
topic |
Comunicación Barreras de comunicación Seguridad del paciente Errores médicos. Communication Communication barriers Patient safety Medical errors. Comunicação Barreiras de comunicação Segurança do paciente Erros médicos. |
description |
Introduction: The way how inter-professional relationships in health are established can generate errors and harm to patients. Objective: examine the nurses' ability to manifest themselves in the face of failures in patient care with the potential for adverse events; and, identify facilitators capable of enhancing the voice of nurses, in the face of ongoing unsafe acts, practiced by health professionals in two hospitals in the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre / RS. Methodology: a multiple and embedded case study was carried out. Data collection between July and August 2020, through semi-structured, virtual, and recorded interviews; for data analysis, the method of analysis of Laurence Bardin was adopted. Results: the ability of nurses to express their concerns related to patient safety depended on some factors in addition to the severity of the damage, such as the personal aspect, the person to be challenged or questioned, the professional (where, approaching the medical team was more difficult than the nursing technician), and the situation or context. Speech enhancers also emerged, mainly: personnel, experience, knowledge, leadership, management, and processes. Conclusion: personal characteristics, such as maturity, and knowledge, helped in decision making, while interdisciplinarity appeared discreetly in the speeches, reinforcing the need for teamwork with this focus, in order to share knowledge and support in uncertainties. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16427 10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16427 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16427 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16427 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/16427/14786 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 7; e2821076427 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 7; e2821076427 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 7; e2821076427 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052818012504064 |