Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24847 |
Resumo: | Objective: To develop and content-validate a multidisciplinary instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration. Method: This is a cross-sectional, quantitative content validation study that followed the following steps: development of an instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration based on a literature review and validation of this instrument according to agreement and relevance among judges. For this phase, 6 specialists in the field were invited (1 physician, 1 physiotherapist, 1 speech therapist, and 3 nurses) to evaluate the instrument and report agreement based on a Likert-type questionnaire. For the analysis of agreement between the judges, the Content Validity Index was used for each item (CVI-I) and total (CVI-T). Results: The instrument consisted of 10 items: age (≥60 years); past illness; Glasgow scale <13; orotracheal intubation; orotracheal intubation time (≥24hours); tracheostomy; feeling dyspneia, inadequate oral hygiene; via alternative feeding and coughing/choking. There is agreement between judges regarding each item (CVI-I 1.0) and also in the entirety (CVI-T 1.0) of the instrument. Conclusion: The multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in the hospital environment was developed and has content validity, provided by a team of experienced professionals in the field. |
id |
UNIFEI_c338c8b4b440621d932077c61f2c5a28 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24847 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environmentValidación de un instrumento multiprofesional para el cribado del riesgo de broncoaspiración en un entorno hospitalarioValidação de um instrumento multiprofissional para rastreio do risco de broncoaspiração em ambiente hospitalarEstudos de validaçãoTranstornos de deglutiçãoProgramas de rastreamentoBroncopneumonia.Estudio de validaciónTrastornos de degluciónTamizaje masivoBronconeumonía.Validation studyDeglutition disordersMass screeningBronchopneumonia.Objective: To develop and content-validate a multidisciplinary instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration. Method: This is a cross-sectional, quantitative content validation study that followed the following steps: development of an instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration based on a literature review and validation of this instrument according to agreement and relevance among judges. For this phase, 6 specialists in the field were invited (1 physician, 1 physiotherapist, 1 speech therapist, and 3 nurses) to evaluate the instrument and report agreement based on a Likert-type questionnaire. For the analysis of agreement between the judges, the Content Validity Index was used for each item (CVI-I) and total (CVI-T). Results: The instrument consisted of 10 items: age (≥60 years); past illness; Glasgow scale <13; orotracheal intubation; orotracheal intubation time (≥24hours); tracheostomy; feeling dyspneia, inadequate oral hygiene; via alternative feeding and coughing/choking. There is agreement between judges regarding each item (CVI-I 1.0) and also in the entirety (CVI-T 1.0) of the instrument. Conclusion: The multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in the hospital environment was developed and has content validity, provided by a team of experienced professionals in the field.Objetivo: Desarrollar y validar el contenido de un instrumento multidisciplinario para el cribado del riesgo de broncoaspiración. Método: Se trata de un estudio de validación de contenido cuantitativo, transversal, que siguió los siguientes pasos: desarrollo de un instrumento de cribado del riesgo de broncoaspiración a partir de la revisión de la literatura y la validación de este instrumento según concordancia y relevancia entre los jueces. Para esta fase se invitó a 6 especialistas en la materia (1 médico, 1 fisioterapeuta, 1 logopeda y 3 enfermeras) para evaluar el instrumento y reportar concordancia en base a un cuestionario tipo Likert. Para el análisis de concordancia entre los jueces se utilizó el Índice de Validez de Contenido para cada ítem (IVC-I) y total (IVC-T). Resultados: El instrumento constaba de 10 ítems: edad (≥ 60 años); enfermedad pasada; Escala de Glasgow <13; intubación orotraqueal; tiempo de intubación orotraqueal (≥24 h); traqueotomía; sensación de disnea, higiene bucal inadecuada; mediante alimentación alternativa y toser / atragantarse. Existe acuerdo entre los jueces en cada ítem (IVC-I 1.0) y también en la totalidad (IVC-T 1.0) del instrumento. Conclusión: El instrumento multiprofesional de cribado del riesgo de broncoaspiración en el ámbito hospitalario fue desarrollado y tiene validez de contenido, proporcionado por un equipo de profesionales con experiencia en la materia.Objetivo: Desenvolver e validar em conteúdo um instrumento multiprofissional para rastreio do risco de broncoaspiração. Método: Trata-se de um estudo transversal, quantitativo de validação de conteúdo que seguiu as seguintes etapas: elaboração de um instrumento de rastreio do risco de broncoaspiração com base em uma revisão bibliográfica e validação desse instrumento de acordo com concordância e relavância entre juízes. Para esta fase, 6 profissionais especialistas na area foram convidados (1 médico, 1 fisioterapeuta, 1 fonoaudiólogo, e 3 enfermeiros) a avaliar o instrumento e informar concordância baseadas em um questionário do tipo Likert. Para análise de concordância entre os juízes foi utilizado o Indice de Validade de Conteúdo para cada item (IVC-I) e total (IVC-T). Resultados: O instrumento foi composto por 10 itens: idade (≥60 anos); doença pregressa; Escala de Glasgow <13; intubação orotraqueal; tempo de intubação orotraqueal (≥24h); traqueostomia; sensação de dispneia, higiêne oral inadequada; via alternativa de alimentação e tosse/engasgo. Há concordância entre juízes com relação a cada item (IVC-I 1,0) e também na totalidade (IVC-T 1,0) do instrumento. Conclusão: O instrumento multiprofissional para rastreio do risco de broncoaspiração em ambiente hospitalar foi desenvolvido e apresenta validade de conteúdo, assegurado por uma equipe de profissionais experientes na área.Research, Society and Development2022-01-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2484710.33448/rsd-v11i1.24847Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e27111124847Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e27111124847Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e271111248472525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24847/21871Copyright (c) 2022 Ana Paula de Andrade Sartori; Paulo Henrique Coltro; Tatiane Caroline Boumer; Isabel de Lima Zanata; Rosane Sampaio Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSartori, Ana Paula de Andrade Coltro, Paulo HenriqueBoumer, Tatiane CarolineZanata, Isabel de Lima Santos, Rosane Sampaio 2022-01-16T18:08:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24847Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:16.490468Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment Validación de un instrumento multiprofesional para el cribado del riesgo de broncoaspiración en un entorno hospitalario Validação de um instrumento multiprofissional para rastreio do risco de broncoaspiração em ambiente hospitalar |
title |
Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment |
spellingShingle |
Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment Sartori, Ana Paula de Andrade Estudos de validação Transtornos de deglutição Programas de rastreamento Broncopneumonia. Estudio de validación Trastornos de deglución Tamizaje masivo Bronconeumonía. Validation study Deglutition disorders Mass screening Bronchopneumonia. |
title_short |
Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment |
title_full |
Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment |
title_fullStr |
Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment |
title_sort |
Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment |
author |
Sartori, Ana Paula de Andrade |
author_facet |
Sartori, Ana Paula de Andrade Coltro, Paulo Henrique Boumer, Tatiane Caroline Zanata, Isabel de Lima Santos, Rosane Sampaio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Coltro, Paulo Henrique Boumer, Tatiane Caroline Zanata, Isabel de Lima Santos, Rosane Sampaio |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sartori, Ana Paula de Andrade Coltro, Paulo Henrique Boumer, Tatiane Caroline Zanata, Isabel de Lima Santos, Rosane Sampaio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Estudos de validação Transtornos de deglutição Programas de rastreamento Broncopneumonia. Estudio de validación Trastornos de deglución Tamizaje masivo Bronconeumonía. Validation study Deglutition disorders Mass screening Bronchopneumonia. |
topic |
Estudos de validação Transtornos de deglutição Programas de rastreamento Broncopneumonia. Estudio de validación Trastornos de deglución Tamizaje masivo Bronconeumonía. Validation study Deglutition disorders Mass screening Bronchopneumonia. |
description |
Objective: To develop and content-validate a multidisciplinary instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration. Method: This is a cross-sectional, quantitative content validation study that followed the following steps: development of an instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration based on a literature review and validation of this instrument according to agreement and relevance among judges. For this phase, 6 specialists in the field were invited (1 physician, 1 physiotherapist, 1 speech therapist, and 3 nurses) to evaluate the instrument and report agreement based on a Likert-type questionnaire. For the analysis of agreement between the judges, the Content Validity Index was used for each item (CVI-I) and total (CVI-T). Results: The instrument consisted of 10 items: age (≥60 years); past illness; Glasgow scale <13; orotracheal intubation; orotracheal intubation time (≥24hours); tracheostomy; feeling dyspneia, inadequate oral hygiene; via alternative feeding and coughing/choking. There is agreement between judges regarding each item (CVI-I 1.0) and also in the entirety (CVI-T 1.0) of the instrument. Conclusion: The multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in the hospital environment was developed and has content validity, provided by a team of experienced professionals in the field. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24847 10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24847 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24847 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24847 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24847/21871 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e27111124847 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e27111124847 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e27111124847 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052791862067200 |