Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sartori, Ana Paula de Andrade
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Coltro, Paulo Henrique, Boumer, Tatiane Caroline, Zanata, Isabel de Lima, Santos, Rosane Sampaio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24847
Resumo: Objective: To develop and content-validate a multidisciplinary instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration. Method: This is a cross-sectional, quantitative content validation study that followed the following steps: development of an instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration based on a literature review and validation of this instrument according to agreement and relevance among judges. For this phase, 6 specialists in the field were invited (1 physician, 1 physiotherapist, 1 speech therapist, and 3 nurses) to evaluate the instrument and report agreement based on a Likert-type questionnaire. For the analysis of agreement between the judges, the Content Validity Index was used for each item (CVI-I) and total (CVI-T). Results: The instrument consisted of 10 items: age (≥60 years); past illness; Glasgow scale <13; orotracheal intubation; orotracheal intubation time (≥24hours); tracheostomy; feeling dyspneia, inadequate oral hygiene; via alternative feeding and coughing/choking. There is agreement between judges regarding each item (CVI-I 1.0) and also in the entirety (CVI-T 1.0) of the instrument. Conclusion: The multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in the hospital environment was developed and has content validity, provided by a team of experienced professionals in the field.
id UNIFEI_c338c8b4b440621d932077c61f2c5a28
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24847
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environmentValidación de un instrumento multiprofesional para el cribado del riesgo de broncoaspiración en un entorno hospitalarioValidação de um instrumento multiprofissional para rastreio do risco de broncoaspiração em ambiente hospitalarEstudos de validaçãoTranstornos de deglutiçãoProgramas de rastreamentoBroncopneumonia.Estudio de validaciónTrastornos de degluciónTamizaje masivoBronconeumonía.Validation studyDeglutition disordersMass screeningBronchopneumonia.Objective: To develop and content-validate a multidisciplinary instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration. Method: This is a cross-sectional, quantitative content validation study that followed the following steps: development of an instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration based on a literature review and validation of this instrument according to agreement and relevance among judges. For this phase, 6 specialists in the field were invited (1 physician, 1 physiotherapist, 1 speech therapist, and 3 nurses) to evaluate the instrument and report agreement based on a Likert-type questionnaire. For the analysis of agreement between the judges, the Content Validity Index was used for each item (CVI-I) and total (CVI-T). Results: The instrument consisted of 10 items: age (≥60 years); past illness; Glasgow scale <13; orotracheal intubation; orotracheal intubation time (≥24hours); tracheostomy; feeling dyspneia, inadequate oral hygiene; via alternative feeding and coughing/choking. There is agreement between judges regarding each item (CVI-I 1.0) and also in the entirety (CVI-T 1.0) of the instrument. Conclusion: The multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in the hospital environment was developed and has content validity, provided by a team of experienced professionals in the field.Objetivo: Desarrollar y validar el contenido de un instrumento multidisciplinario para el cribado del riesgo de broncoaspiración. Método: Se trata de un estudio de validación de contenido cuantitativo, transversal, que siguió los siguientes pasos: desarrollo de un instrumento de cribado del riesgo de broncoaspiración a partir de la revisión de la literatura y la validación de este instrumento según concordancia y relevancia entre los jueces. Para esta fase se invitó a 6 especialistas en la materia (1 médico, 1 fisioterapeuta, 1 logopeda y 3 enfermeras) para evaluar el instrumento y reportar concordancia en base a un cuestionario tipo Likert. Para el análisis de concordancia entre los jueces se utilizó el Índice de Validez de Contenido para cada ítem (IVC-I) y total (IVC-T). Resultados: El instrumento constaba de 10 ítems: edad (≥ 60 años); enfermedad pasada; Escala de Glasgow <13; intubación orotraqueal; tiempo de intubación orotraqueal (≥24 h); traqueotomía; sensación de disnea, higiene bucal inadecuada; mediante alimentación alternativa y toser / atragantarse. Existe acuerdo entre los jueces en cada ítem (IVC-I 1.0) y también en la totalidad (IVC-T 1.0) del instrumento. Conclusión: El instrumento multiprofesional de cribado del riesgo de broncoaspiración en el ámbito hospitalario fue desarrollado y tiene validez de contenido, proporcionado por un equipo de profesionales con experiencia en la materia.Objetivo: Desenvolver e validar em conteúdo um instrumento multiprofissional para rastreio do risco de broncoaspiração. Método: Trata-se de um estudo transversal, quantitativo de validação de conteúdo que seguiu as seguintes etapas: elaboração de um instrumento de rastreio do risco de broncoaspiração com base em uma revisão bibliográfica e validação desse instrumento de acordo com concordância e relavância entre juízes. Para esta fase, 6 profissionais especialistas na area foram convidados (1 médico, 1 fisioterapeuta, 1 fonoaudiólogo, e 3 enfermeiros) a avaliar o instrumento e informar concordância baseadas em um questionário do tipo Likert. Para análise de concordância entre os juízes foi utilizado o Indice de Validade de Conteúdo para cada item (IVC-I) e total (IVC-T). Resultados: O instrumento foi composto por 10 itens: idade (≥60 anos); doença pregressa; Escala de Glasgow <13; intubação orotraqueal; tempo de intubação orotraqueal (≥24h); traqueostomia; sensação de dispneia, higiêne oral inadequada; via alternativa de alimentação e tosse/engasgo. Há concordância entre juízes com relação a cada item (IVC-I 1,0) e também na totalidade (IVC-T 1,0) do instrumento. Conclusão: O instrumento multiprofissional para rastreio do risco de broncoaspiração em ambiente hospitalar foi desenvolvido e apresenta validade de conteúdo, assegurado por uma equipe de profissionais experientes na área.Research, Society and Development2022-01-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2484710.33448/rsd-v11i1.24847Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e27111124847Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e27111124847Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e271111248472525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24847/21871Copyright (c) 2022 Ana Paula de Andrade Sartori; Paulo Henrique Coltro; Tatiane Caroline Boumer; Isabel de Lima Zanata; Rosane Sampaio Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSartori, Ana Paula de Andrade Coltro, Paulo HenriqueBoumer, Tatiane CarolineZanata, Isabel de Lima Santos, Rosane Sampaio 2022-01-16T18:08:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24847Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:16.490468Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment
Validación de un instrumento multiprofesional para el cribado del riesgo de broncoaspiración en un entorno hospitalario
Validação de um instrumento multiprofissional para rastreio do risco de broncoaspiração em ambiente hospitalar
title Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment
spellingShingle Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment
Sartori, Ana Paula de Andrade
Estudos de validação
Transtornos de deglutição
Programas de rastreamento
Broncopneumonia.
Estudio de validación
Trastornos de deglución
Tamizaje masivo
Bronconeumonía.
Validation study
Deglutition disorders
Mass screening
Bronchopneumonia.
title_short Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment
title_full Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment
title_fullStr Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment
title_sort Validation of a multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in a hospital environment
author Sartori, Ana Paula de Andrade
author_facet Sartori, Ana Paula de Andrade
Coltro, Paulo Henrique
Boumer, Tatiane Caroline
Zanata, Isabel de Lima
Santos, Rosane Sampaio
author_role author
author2 Coltro, Paulo Henrique
Boumer, Tatiane Caroline
Zanata, Isabel de Lima
Santos, Rosane Sampaio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sartori, Ana Paula de Andrade
Coltro, Paulo Henrique
Boumer, Tatiane Caroline
Zanata, Isabel de Lima
Santos, Rosane Sampaio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Estudos de validação
Transtornos de deglutição
Programas de rastreamento
Broncopneumonia.
Estudio de validación
Trastornos de deglución
Tamizaje masivo
Bronconeumonía.
Validation study
Deglutition disorders
Mass screening
Bronchopneumonia.
topic Estudos de validação
Transtornos de deglutição
Programas de rastreamento
Broncopneumonia.
Estudio de validación
Trastornos de deglución
Tamizaje masivo
Bronconeumonía.
Validation study
Deglutition disorders
Mass screening
Bronchopneumonia.
description Objective: To develop and content-validate a multidisciplinary instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration. Method: This is a cross-sectional, quantitative content validation study that followed the following steps: development of an instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration based on a literature review and validation of this instrument according to agreement and relevance among judges. For this phase, 6 specialists in the field were invited (1 physician, 1 physiotherapist, 1 speech therapist, and 3 nurses) to evaluate the instrument and report agreement based on a Likert-type questionnaire. For the analysis of agreement between the judges, the Content Validity Index was used for each item (CVI-I) and total (CVI-T). Results: The instrument consisted of 10 items: age (≥60 years); past illness; Glasgow scale <13; orotracheal intubation; orotracheal intubation time (≥24hours); tracheostomy; feeling dyspneia, inadequate oral hygiene; via alternative feeding and coughing/choking. There is agreement between judges regarding each item (CVI-I 1.0) and also in the entirety (CVI-T 1.0) of the instrument. Conclusion: The multiprofessional instrument for screening the risk of bronchoaspiration in the hospital environment was developed and has content validity, provided by a team of experienced professionals in the field.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24847
10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24847
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24847
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i1.24847
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24847/21871
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 1; e27111124847
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 1; e27111124847
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 1; e27111124847
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052791862067200