Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: CLEFT-Q assessment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21180 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The perspective for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) is important in assessing treatment outcomes and contributing to a better quality of life. Objectives: To evaluate the influence of treatment patients' quality of life with CLP using CLEFT-Q. Methods: Observational cross-sectional study, with 100 individuals attended in a CLP Service. Results: The mean age of the sample was 16±4.9 years. The most frequent cleft type was cleft lip/palate and the most prevalent, transforamen (85%). The treatments performed were: cheiloplasty, palatoplasty, bone grafting, rhinoplasty and orthodontic treatment. The lowest Cleft-q scores were in Appearance and related to appearance of nose and nostrils while the highest were observed in Quality of life Scales as psychological and school. There was a statistically significant correlation between treatments performed and at least one Scale of Appearance, Quality of Life and Facial Function, except for rhinoplasty. Orthodontic treatment showed a negative correlation with the three domains, and the association was statistically significant in Face, Nostrils, Teeth, Lips, Difficulty Speaking, School, Social and Speech Scales, except for Nostrils, Psychological and Eating/Drinking. The speech scale showed statistically significant correlation with palatoplasty, bone grafting and orthodontic treatment and eating/drinking scale showed statistically significant correlation only with bone grafting. Conclusions: The results suggests that the patients studied were dissatisfied with their facial appearance, especially regarding nose, nostrils and teeth. All treatments impacted the patients' perception of their appearance, health-related quality of life and facial function. Cheiloplasty and bone grafting had a positive impact on patients' quality of life. |
id |
UNIFEI_cad1bf766fbaf1b038e16978cdcc549b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21180 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: CLEFT-Q assessmentImpacto de los tratamientos para el labio leporino y el paladar hendido en la calidad de vida: Evaluación CLEFT-QImpacto dos tratamentos de fissuras labiopalatinas na qualidade de vida: avaliação pelo CLEFT-QCleft LipCleft PalateQuality of LifeQuality of life.Fenda LabialFissura PalatinaQualidade de VidaQualidade de vida.Labio leporinoPaladar hendidopaladar hendidoCalidad de vida.Calidad de vidaIntroduction: The perspective for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) is important in assessing treatment outcomes and contributing to a better quality of life. Objectives: To evaluate the influence of treatment patients' quality of life with CLP using CLEFT-Q. Methods: Observational cross-sectional study, with 100 individuals attended in a CLP Service. Results: The mean age of the sample was 16±4.9 years. The most frequent cleft type was cleft lip/palate and the most prevalent, transforamen (85%). The treatments performed were: cheiloplasty, palatoplasty, bone grafting, rhinoplasty and orthodontic treatment. The lowest Cleft-q scores were in Appearance and related to appearance of nose and nostrils while the highest were observed in Quality of life Scales as psychological and school. There was a statistically significant correlation between treatments performed and at least one Scale of Appearance, Quality of Life and Facial Function, except for rhinoplasty. Orthodontic treatment showed a negative correlation with the three domains, and the association was statistically significant in Face, Nostrils, Teeth, Lips, Difficulty Speaking, School, Social and Speech Scales, except for Nostrils, Psychological and Eating/Drinking. The speech scale showed statistically significant correlation with palatoplasty, bone grafting and orthodontic treatment and eating/drinking scale showed statistically significant correlation only with bone grafting. Conclusions: The results suggests that the patients studied were dissatisfied with their facial appearance, especially regarding nose, nostrils and teeth. All treatments impacted the patients' perception of their appearance, health-related quality of life and facial function. Cheiloplasty and bone grafting had a positive impact on patients' quality of life.Introducción: La perspectiva del paciente con fisura labiopalatina (FLP) es importante en la evaluación de los resultados del tratamiento y puede contribuir a una mejor calidad de vida. Objetivos: Utilizar el CLEFT-Q para evaluar la influencia del tratamiento en la calidad de vida de pacientes con FLP. Métodos: Estudio observacional transversal con 100 individuos atendidos en un Servicio de FLP y que responderan el CLEFT-Q. Resultados: La edad media de los participantes fue 16±4,9 años. El tipo de hendidura más frecuente fue la de labio/paladar hendido, siendo el transforamen el más prevalente (85%). Los tratamientos realizados fueron: queiloplastia, palatoplastia, injerto óseo, rinoplastia y tratamiento de ortodoncia. Las puntuaciones más bajas del CLEFT-Q estaban relacionadas con la Apariencia, principalmente de la nariz y las fosas nasales, y las más altas eran las psicológicas y escolares para la Calidad de vida. Hubo una correlación estadísticamente significativa entre los tratamientos realizados y al menos una escala de los dominios Apariencia, Calidad de vida y Función facial, excepto para la rinoplastia. El tratamiento de ortodoncia mostró una correlación negativa con los tres dominios, y la asociación fue estadísticamente significativa para la cara, las fosas nasales, los dientes, los labios, la dificultad para hablar, la escuela, lo social y el habla, excepto para la nariz, lo psicológico y comer/beber. El habla mostró una correlación estadísticamente significativa con la palatoplastia, el injerto óseo y el tratamiento de ortodoncia, y el comer/beber una correlación estadísticamente significativa con el injerto óseo. Conclusiones: Pacientes com FLP sentían insatisfacción por el aspecto facial, especialmente en lo que respecta a la nariz, las fosas nasales y los dientes. Los tratamientos repercutieron en la percepción de la apariencia del paciente, la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud y la función facial. La queiloplastia y el injerto óseo tuvieron un impacto positivo en la calidad de vida de pacientes con FPL.Introdução: A perspectiva do paciente com fissura labiopalatina (FLP) é importante para avaliar resultados obtidos nos tratamentos, podendo contribuir para melhor qualidade de vida. Objetivos: Através do CLEFT-Q, avaliar a influência do tratamento na qualidade de vida do paciente. Métodos: Estudo transversal observacional, com 100 indivíduos com FLP, os quais responderam o CLEFT-Q. Resultados: A média de idade dos participantes foi 16±4,9 anos. O tipo de FLP mais frequente foi o transforame, com 85%. Os tratamentos realizados foram: queiloplastia, palatoplastia, enxerto ósseo, rinoplastia e tratamento ortodôntico. Os escores CLEFT-Q mais baixos foram nas Escalas de Aparência, relacionados à aparência do nariz e narinas e, os maiores foram nas Escalas de Qualidade de vida, relacionados a aspectos psicológico e escolar. Houve correlação estatisticamente significante entre os tratamentos e pelo menos uma Escala nos domínios Aparência, Qualidade de vida e Função facial, exceto para rinoplastia. O tratamento ortodôntico teve correlação negativa com todos os domínios, com associação estatisticamente significante nas Escalas face, narinas, dentes, lábios, dificuldade da fala, escolar, social e fala, exceto para nariz, psicológico e comer/beber. A escala fala teve correlação estatisticamente significante com palatoplastia, enxerto ósseo e tratamento ortodôntico e, a Escala comer/beber teve com enxerto ósseo. Conclusões: Pacientes com FLP sentem insatisfação com sua aparência facial, especialmente, quanto ao nariz, narinas e dentes. Os tratamentos impactaram na percepção do paciente quanto a aparência, qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde e função facial. A queiloplastia e o enxerto ósseo impactaram positivamente na qualidade de vida do paciente com FLP.Research, Society and Development2021-10-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2118010.33448/rsd-v10i13.21180Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e304101321180Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e304101321180Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e3041013211802525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21180/19079Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Sueli Marques Soares; Mariana Silva Barros; Rosa Helena Wanderley Lacerda; Ana Carolina Lyra de Albuquerque; Alexandre Rezende Vieirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Maria Sueli Marques Barros, Mariana Silva Albuquerque, Ana Carolina Lyra de Lacerda, Rosa Helena Wanderley Vieira, Alexandre Rezende 2021-11-21T18:26:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21180Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:39.638060Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: CLEFT-Q assessment Impacto de los tratamientos para el labio leporino y el paladar hendido en la calidad de vida: Evaluación CLEFT-Q Impacto dos tratamentos de fissuras labiopalatinas na qualidade de vida: avaliação pelo CLEFT-Q |
title |
Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: CLEFT-Q assessment |
spellingShingle |
Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: CLEFT-Q assessment Soares, Maria Sueli Marques Cleft Lip Cleft Palate Quality of Life Quality of life. Fenda Labial Fissura Palatina Qualidade de Vida Qualidade de vida. Labio leporino Paladar hendido paladar hendido Calidad de vida. Calidad de vida |
title_short |
Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: CLEFT-Q assessment |
title_full |
Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: CLEFT-Q assessment |
title_fullStr |
Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: CLEFT-Q assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: CLEFT-Q assessment |
title_sort |
Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: CLEFT-Q assessment |
author |
Soares, Maria Sueli Marques |
author_facet |
Soares, Maria Sueli Marques Barros, Mariana Silva Albuquerque, Ana Carolina Lyra de Lacerda, Rosa Helena Wanderley Vieira, Alexandre Rezende |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barros, Mariana Silva Albuquerque, Ana Carolina Lyra de Lacerda, Rosa Helena Wanderley Vieira, Alexandre Rezende |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Maria Sueli Marques Barros, Mariana Silva Albuquerque, Ana Carolina Lyra de Lacerda, Rosa Helena Wanderley Vieira, Alexandre Rezende |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cleft Lip Cleft Palate Quality of Life Quality of life. Fenda Labial Fissura Palatina Qualidade de Vida Qualidade de vida. Labio leporino Paladar hendido paladar hendido Calidad de vida. Calidad de vida |
topic |
Cleft Lip Cleft Palate Quality of Life Quality of life. Fenda Labial Fissura Palatina Qualidade de Vida Qualidade de vida. Labio leporino Paladar hendido paladar hendido Calidad de vida. Calidad de vida |
description |
Introduction: The perspective for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) is important in assessing treatment outcomes and contributing to a better quality of life. Objectives: To evaluate the influence of treatment patients' quality of life with CLP using CLEFT-Q. Methods: Observational cross-sectional study, with 100 individuals attended in a CLP Service. Results: The mean age of the sample was 16±4.9 years. The most frequent cleft type was cleft lip/palate and the most prevalent, transforamen (85%). The treatments performed were: cheiloplasty, palatoplasty, bone grafting, rhinoplasty and orthodontic treatment. The lowest Cleft-q scores were in Appearance and related to appearance of nose and nostrils while the highest were observed in Quality of life Scales as psychological and school. There was a statistically significant correlation between treatments performed and at least one Scale of Appearance, Quality of Life and Facial Function, except for rhinoplasty. Orthodontic treatment showed a negative correlation with the three domains, and the association was statistically significant in Face, Nostrils, Teeth, Lips, Difficulty Speaking, School, Social and Speech Scales, except for Nostrils, Psychological and Eating/Drinking. The speech scale showed statistically significant correlation with palatoplasty, bone grafting and orthodontic treatment and eating/drinking scale showed statistically significant correlation only with bone grafting. Conclusions: The results suggests that the patients studied were dissatisfied with their facial appearance, especially regarding nose, nostrils and teeth. All treatments impacted the patients' perception of their appearance, health-related quality of life and facial function. Cheiloplasty and bone grafting had a positive impact on patients' quality of life. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21180 10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21180 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21180 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21180 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21180/19079 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e304101321180 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e304101321180 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e304101321180 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052756690731008 |